Presentation on theme: "School District of Fort Atkinson A Look At The Future."— Presentation transcript:
School District of Fort Atkinson A Look At The Future
The Board of Education is looking at three major challenges facing our school system. NEEDED BUILDING UPGRADES – To the heating, ventilating and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems at Barrie, Rockwell, Purdy and the Middle School. A STRUCTURAL FINANCIAL DEFICIT – There is an annual revenue shortfall for day-to-day operations. TECHNOLOGY NEEDS – The State TEACH Grant used for technology ended in 2003.
CHALLENGE #1 Needed Building Upgrades (HVAC Systems)
School District of Fort Atkinson Because our buildings have been well cared for, we believe that with some updating Barrie, Rockwell, Purdy, and the Middle School can continue to serve us well into the future.
History of Barrie School 1939 Original Building has steam heat which originally used coal for fuel. The mechanical systems are 65 years old and are obsolete. 1976 Addition has hot water heat. All mechanical systems are 29 years old in this addition. 1997 Remodeling included classroom upgrades, and technology improvements, but no mechanical upgrades.
History of Purdy School 1956 Original Building has steam heat. The mechanical systems are 49 years old and are obsolete. 1976 Addition has hot water heat. All mechanical systems are 29 years old in this addition. 1997 Remodeling included classroom upgrades, and technology improvements, but no mechanical upgrades.
History of Rockwell School 1956 Original Building has steam heat. The mechanical systems are 49 years old and are now obsolete. 1959 Addition is heated by steam from the 49-year-old original building. All mechanical systems are 46 years old in this addition. 1976 Addition has hot water heat. All mechanical systems are 29 years old in this addition. 1997 Remodeling included classroom upgrades, and technology improvements, but no mechanical upgrades.
History of the Middle School Original 1911 building has been replaced except for the steam boilers which originally used coal for fuel. These boilers were produced in 1929. They are 76 years old and are obsolete. Additions and mechanical systems age: 1953 (52 years old); 1960 (45 years old), and 1965 (40 years old). 1983 Remodeling which replaced the 1911 section, added a gymnasium, and air conditioned the offices, music rooms and the library. Other mechanical upgrades were minimal. 1998 Remodeling from a high school to a middle school, with technology improvements and minimal mechanical systems upgrades.
Why We Need to Upgrade In addition to being 49 to 76 years old, and obsolete, the steam boilers and heating systems in these four buildings are very energy inefficient, expensive to operate and maintain, and cause large temperature swings in classrooms, especially in Spring and Fall.
Fort Atkinson High School & Luther School Both the High School (1998) and Luther Elementary with the Administration wing (1966, 1967, 1997, 2001) are air-conditioned and have efficient hot water heat. These buildings are not recommended for renovation or upgrades at this time.
Keeping our house up-to-date is something we just need to do! We may not look forward to updating our house we know its something we must do to protect our investment!
Technology Needs Reduced revenue The State TEACH block grant, which provided about $90,000/year for technology purchases, ended in 2003. A 7% reduction in the non-employee portion of school building budgets, beginning in 2003-2004, impacted technology spending. Maintaining technology Replace computers on a 5 year cycle. Maintain the districts network Infrastructure Total additional needed per year to maintain current technology services = $179,000
What is the Structural Financial Deficit? The Revenue Cap – State Law limits the growth of schools revenues to about 3% annually. The QEO (Qualified Economic Offer) – State Law requires schools to offer a wage and fringe benefit increase of 3.8% annually to avoid arbitration. Inflation on utilities, equipment, supplies, etc. The Structural Financial Deficit = Approximately 1% of the total budget each year. All things being equal, the district must cut about $230,000 each year to balance the operating budget.
Reality of Recurring Structural Deficit To meet the annual structural deficit, our District would need to reduce operational costs by $230,000 every year There is NO END to the cuts needed to balance the budget. No legislative relief is in sight.
What does $230,000 look like? EACH OF THESE EQUALS APPROXIMATELY THE $230,000 NEEDED TO BALANCE THE BUDGET FOR ONE YEAR: 4-5 Classroom Teachers Entire K-12 Sports Program Half of the K-12 Art Program More than a third of the K-12 Music Program Half of Technology Instruction Half of the Foreign Language Program
Actions taken to stay within the State Imposed Revenue Cap Restrictions Prepared 5-Year financial projections. Reduced school building budgets for supplies and equipment so they are now 7% less than they were in 1993-1994. Reduced staff (attritions when possible). Employed energy savings strategies. Settled labor contracts within the amount budgeted.
2000-01 MS Custodian$45,000 MS Phy Ed Teacher$50,000 2002-03 Assistant Dir. of Instruction*$80,000 Barrie 3rd Grade Teacher$50,000 MS Science Teacher$50,000 HS Business Teacher$50,000 HS Science$50,000 MS Aide$30,000 Purdy Aide$4,500 2003-04 Elem IMC Director**$50,000 Luther ED Teacher$40,000 Elem Art partial$24,000 7% Building & supply cut$143,000 2004-05 Elem Guidance$80,000 MS Math Teacher$72,000 HS Assistant Principal*$80,000 *Half of each position reinstated ** Position reinstated, 2004-05 Dealing with the Structural Deficit 2000-05 Dollar amounts below include wages and fringe benefits
A Brief Review of the Past The State-imposed Revenue Cap began in 1993-94. Staff reductions and a one-time 7% supply and equipment budget cut were made during the past 11 years. Student enrollments were declining until 2003-2004, but have increased in each of the last two years. There is a direct relationship between student enrollment and the amount of revenue available for day-to-day operations under the Revenue Cap. The unexpected increase of 40 students last September resulted in the equivalent of a $110,000 increase in the Revenue Cap.
What Is Happening Now Increasing numbers of students from surrounding school districts are attending our schools under Wisconsins Open Enrollment law. Each open enrollment student brings about $5,600 of additional revenue to our school district. The structural deficit is not expected to begin to create a financial problem until 2007-2008 due to a combination of cost reductions in prior years and recent unexpected increases in student enrollment. The heating, ventilating and air conditioning replacements and upgrades will not be recurring costs, but under current law the structural financial deficit and technology needs will be recurring.
Concerns for the Future The Board of Education is concerned about: Maintaining and extending the useful life of our school buildings and reducing energy costs with more efficient heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems. Being able to continue to provide the excellent educational programs that equip our students for a productive and fulfilling life. Being able to continue to provide students and staff with adequate computers and technology to enhance efficiency and increase student achievement.
A Solution Being Considered The Board of Education is considering: Having a referendum election next October (2005) to ask electors for their approval to exceed the Revenue Cap to address each of these three major challenges.
A RARE Opportunity Having two plus years without an anticipated shortage of operating funds creates a rare opportunityan opportunity to address the large non-recurring and recurring issues one at a time rather than simultaneously. If electors approve a referendum permitting the School District to exceed the Revenue Cap by a fixed amount on a recurring basis, those additional funds can be used in the next several years to complete the necessary heating, ventilating and air conditioning work before the additional funds are needed on an ongoing basis for operations (due to the structural deficit). This opportunity is likely to be rare because this is the first time it has occurred since the Revenue Cap was enacted 12 years ago, and there is no indication the Revenue Cap is likely to be repealed anytime soon.
Conceptual Illustration of the Use of Referendum Funds Referendum Amount $2.1M 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
…And If We Dont Take Advantage of the Opportunity... Based on current projections we have about a 3 year window of opportunity. If we delay one year, about 1/3 of that opportunity will be lost. If we delay two years, about 2/3 of that opportunity will be lost. If we delay three years, there will no longer be any significant opportunitybut the 3 challenges will remain. At that point, based on the best information available at this time, it would be necessary to piggyback the heating, ventilating and air conditioning work on top of the structural financial deficit which, at least for a time, would significantly increase the additional burden for taxpayers.
What will this cost the taxpayer? The Board of Education is in the process of determining what is reasonable to bring to the taxpayer. One thing for certain, it is cheaper now than it will be later. There is a fine line between what a community can afford and how we keep our schools excellent.
How Does a Geothermal System Work? 1.It essentially uses the earth as a reservoir of energy. A. In winter, heat is taken from the earth to heat the building. B. In summer, heat is taken from the building and deposited in the earth. 2.A geothermal system uses about 20% more electricity, but no natural gas or other fuel to create heat.
Advantages of a Geothermal System No gas, oil, or coal is needed to heat the buildings. Each room has its own heat pump, so the temperature in each room is independent of the temperature in the rest of the building. Only the individual rooms that are being used need to be heated or coolednot the entire section or zone of the building in which the room(s) are located.
Additional Advantages of Geothermal The system can literally take heat from a room that is too warm and transfer it to a different room that is too cool. The equipment used for heating is the same as that used for air conditioning, so the additional cost for air conditioning is essentially the cost of operation. The engineers tell us that we can heat and air condition the 4 buildings with geothermal for $89,325 less per year than it now costs to just heat those 4 buildings at todays energy prices.
Disadvantages of Geothermal This initial cost is about 12-15% more than a multi-zone or rooftop system. The area outside where the holes are drilled is messed up temporarily.
Property Tax Levy History 1993-1994$ 9,150,045 2004-2005$11,298,534 The 11 changes ranged from a reduction of 9.22% to an Increase of 16.18%. The average change was 1.94%
History of Property Tax Levy Adjustments in October Over the past 25 years: 8 tax increases 15 tax reductions 2 years of no change Net change =
History of Property Tax Levy Adjustments in October Over 14 years prior to Revenue Cap: 4 tax increases 8 tax reductions 2 years of no change Net change =
We Will Continue to Share Our Ideas With You--Share Yours With Us We will be providing additional information as it becomes available, and as decisions are made by the Board of Education. Your interest in your schools is appreciated, and your thoughts and suggestions are welcomed.
Timeline for Referendum Wednesday, June 8, 2005 at 6 p.m. in the Luther Board Room - The Board of Education will hold a special meeting in open session to discuss the structure, amount, and date of the October referendum. Mr. Thomas Griggs, an attorney from Godfrey and Kahn Law Offices, will be on hand to advise the Board on the structuring of a referendum question(s). Monday, June 13, 2005 at 7 p.m. in the Luther Board Room - This will be the regular meeting of the Board of Education for the month of June. At this meeting, it is anticipated that the Board of Education will formerly approve the structure, amount, and date of the referendum to be held in October. Pending Board approval on June 13, presentations will continue throughout the summer and fall to groups of individuals and organizations in our efforts to educate and inform the citizens of Fort Atkinson about the referendum. A steering committee headed by Mr. Paul Hable will meet throughout the summer in organizing a citizens committee effort to successfully pass the referendum in October.
In Summary Our three challenges are interdependent. We have a rare opportunity now to upgrade our buildings. A successful referendum allows us to meet our building needs and maintain our excellent programs for several years into the future. Strong school systems contribute to the vitality of a community. We have an opportunity to plan now and remain a great school system.
Conceptual Illustration of the Use of Referendum Funds Referendum Amount $2.1M 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Conceptual Illustration of the Use of Referendum Funds
Thank You! Maintaining the public trust of stakeholders and citizens is foremost to the Board of Education, the entire governance team and the School District of Fort Atkinson