Presentation on theme: "Law & Legal Institutions Civil Law Legislatively enacted Inquisitorial process Common Law Based on social norms and precedent Adversarial process Use of."— Presentation transcript:
Law & Legal Institutions Civil Law Legislatively enacted Inquisitorial process Common Law Based on social norms and precedent Adversarial process Use of juries
State Courts Trial courts: entry level courts Appellate courts Supreme courts Federal Courts 94 districts 13 appellate districts US Supreme Court Law & Legal Institutions Federal Jurisdiction: Federal questions Cases to which US is a party Diversity cases
Parties Plaintiff Defendant Burden of Proof Civil cases: preponderance of evidence Criminal cases: beyond a reasonable doubt Verdict/Judgment Appellate decisions Affirm Reverse Remand Nature of a Legal Dispute
Evolution of Common Law Butterfield v. Forrester, 11 East 60 (1809) Contributory negligence Davies v. Mann, 10 M&W 545 (1842) Last clear chance doctrine Riggs v. Palmer, 22 N.E. 188 (1889) Can a murderer inherit from the person whom he murdered?
Four Areas of Law Property Contract Tort Criminal
Property Law Legal framework for allocating resources and distributing wealth Economic Goal: efficient resource allocation Economic Theory of Property Bargaining theory (game theory) Public goods theory Externalities theory
4 Questions 1.What things may be privately owned? 2.How are ownership rights established? 3.What can owners do with their property? 4.How are property rights protected?
Orbitcom, Inc., spent $125 million designing, launching, and maintaining a satellite for the transmission of business data between Europe and the US. The satellite is positioned in a geosynchronous orbit 25 miles above the Atlantic Ocean. Recently a natural resource-monitoring satellite belonging to the Windsong Corp. has strayed so close to Orbitcoms satellite that the companys transmissions have become unreliable. As a result, Orbitcom has lost customers and has sued Windsong for trespassing on Orbitcoms right to its geosynchronous orbit. Example 2 (p75)
Smoke from BBQ
Economics of Bargaining Peter owns a horse which he claims is worth $9,000 to keep, and Mary covets the horse and decides she is willing to pay $11,000 for it. Mary has $15,000 inheritance income. Non-cooperative outcome: no trade Cooperative outcome: trade at mutually agreed price Value of Cooperative Outcome = [10,000] + [11, ,000] = $26,000 Value of Non-cooperative Outcome = $ $15,000 = $24,000 (threat values) Reasonable sale price = $10,000 Cooperative Surplus = $2,000
Coase Theorem Ronald A. Coase, The Problem of Social Cost, 3 J. L. & Econ. 1 (1960)
Aunt Linda and the Nudist Rifle River Aunt Linda Nudist Judge rules in favor of Aunt Linda Judge rules in favor of Nudist Fence comes down (Linda pays Nudist) 2 rulings $1500 $1000 $1250
A Theorem and a Corollary Coase Theorem If transactions costs are low enough, then private bargaining will result in an efficient use of resources, regardless of the legal assignment of property rights. Corollary When transactions costs are high enough to prevent bargaining, the efficient use of resources will depend on how property rights are assigned. Search costs Negotiation costs Enforcement costs
Lubricate or Allocate? Normative Coase Theorem Structure the law so as to remove impediments to private agreements Normative Hobbes Theorem Structure the law so as to minimize the harm caused by failures in private agreements Prior appropriation: first in time, first in right Water rights in western US Homesteading Act
Lawmaker tradeoff: IC = information cost of the court in determining who values a right the most TC = transaction costs of private bargaining Efficient courts would follow this rule: If IC < TC allocate legal right to the party who values it the most If TC < IC strictly follow precedent Lubricate or Allocate?
How are property rights protected? Remedies for violations: Damages (legal) compensatory money payment backward-looking Injunctions (equitable) an order to perform or refrain from an action forward-looking Torts or contracts Property
FlexMag v. Neighbors FlexMag No Wall Wall No Insulation Neighbors 2000, , , , 800 FlexMag has D.S.: No Insulation Neighbors dont have D.S.
FlexMag v. Neighbors Non-Cooperative Outcome Cooperative Outcome FlexMagNeighborsSurplusFlexMagNeighbors 1. Polluters Rights Neighbors right to damages Neighbors right to injunction Normative Hobbes: only rule 1 is efficient Coase Theorem: choice of rule doesnt matter
Calabresi and Melamed (1972) If TC are low, then injunctions are efficient For private bads If TC are high, then damages are efficient For public bads
What can be privately owned? Private goods: rival and excludable Public goods: non-rival and non-excludable Conclusion: Private goods should be privately owned Public goods should be publicly owned Free rider problem
What may owners do with their property? Externality exception to maximum liberty doctrine
What Can Be Privately Owned? Information Economics How is information different from other goods? Its (usually) a public good Under-provision remedies Government supply or subsidy Charitable contribution Trade secrets protection (contract law) Intellectual property law Patents Copyrights Trademarks Weather Forecasting?
Patent Law Legal monopoly rights for 20 years Non-obvious Practical utility Not commercialized 1 year prior to application Number of Patents Issued per year in US
Suppose that an investment of $100,000 in research yields a pioneering invention that has no commercial value. A subsequent investment of $50,000 in development yields an improvement to the pioneering invention that has commercial value of $1 million. An efficient patent law would grant the patent to: a)The pioneer b)The developer c)Equal rights to both d)Neither of them
Broad: encourages fast, duplicative fundamental research Narrow: encourages slower, complementary developmental research R&D is a joint product Unified R&D efforts? What would Coase say? Patent Law: Breadth Little stand-alone value Large stand-alone value
Tradeoff: innovation v. dissemination Patent Law: Duration duration $ MB MC D* One size fits all? Germany: petty patents Orphan drugsPrizes? Business methods?
Copyright Prevents unauthorized copying of the products of expressive activity Breadth Fair use Sony Betamax case: time-shifting vs archiving Duration Life of artist + 70 years Why limit duration?Tracing costs exist Why has duration increased?Copying costs have fallen
Is resale of art the same as reproduction of art? France requires a resale royalty be paid to original artist (or heirs) California requires resale royalty by paid to artist (while living) Droit de suite P t = $ 1,000 P t+n = $10,000
Trademarks Signal of product quality Duration of TM left to owner Tradenames that have become generic?
Anti-commons? Common property is subject to the tragedy of the commons Corrective: assign private property rights Excessive ownership rights Leads to under-use DNA patents and the public domain? Open source computing
Privatize when cost of administering boundaries is less than cost of congestion When should unowned resources become owned?
How are Property Rights Established? Oil Hammonds v. Central Kentucky Natural Gas Co (1934)
How are Property Rights Established? Fugitive Property First possession: property doesnt belong to anyone until someone extracts it Tied ownership: fugitive property is tied to something else that is easier to establish
How are Property Rights Established? Oil
How are Property Rights Established? Fugitive Property First possession: property doesnt belong to anyone until someone extracts it Simple to administer Encourages inefficient pre-emptive investments Tied ownership: fugitive property is tied to something else that is easier to establish Costly to administer Encourages efficient use of resource
Stack Island Louisiana Mississippi thalweg
What can be done to prove ownership? Paper titles for cars Deeds for property Branding Livery of seisin Stolen goods? US: thief can not give good title Buyers bear risk of verification Europe: thief can give good title Original owners bear risk of verification Liability should fall on those who can bear the risk at lowest cost