Presentation on theme: "of the United States Constitution"— Presentation transcript:
1of the United States Constitution The Judicial BranchArticle IIIof the United States Constitution
2Purpose of CourtsA. Resolve legal disputes by applying the law to indv situations1. Criminal law: the people vs an indv2. Civil law: an indv vs an indv***Please note that a legal indv does NOT have to be a human being. A legal indv can be an indv, a business, a corp, a govt agency.***
3JUDICIAL BRANCH ARTICLE III The Judicial Branch interprets or explains the meaning of laws.Judicial Branch protects your rights!There are different levels of courts which handle different cases.Federal courts handle cases about the Constitution and laws made by Congress.
4How is the Judicial Branch Organized? The Supreme Court is the highest court in the Judicial Branch.The Supreme Court has 9 justices (judges)The head of the Supreme Court is called the Chief Justice.Justices are not elected! The President appoints Justices.The Senate must approve a Justice appointment.
6Term of Office Justices serve for a life term. They may resign or retire. They are in life until death otherwise.Just like the President, Justices may be impeached, tried, and removed from office if found guilty.
7JUDICIAL REVIEWJudicial review is one of the most important powers of the Judicial Branch. It is the power of the courts to say that the Constitution does not allow the gov’t to do something.The Supreme Court may rule that a law made by Congress is unconstitutional!Jurisdiction-area of power/control of the federal courts as described by the Constitution.
8FEDERAL COURTS 1. Supreme Court-U.S. Supreme Court 2. Appellate Courts-12 Regional Circuit Courts of Appeals and 1 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit3. Trial Courts-94 Judicial District Courts and 3 other specialized courts4. Other special courts for military, veterans, taxes, etc.
9THE APPEALS PROCESS 1. Begins at the district court 2. Then proceeds on to the Court of Appeals3. Case could proceed on from their to the Supreme Court—the highest court in our country!
10B. Major players1. Criminal law a. Prosecutor—represents the people b. Defendant—indv accused of breaking law2. Civil law a. Plaintiff—indv who was wronged b. Defendant—indv accused of wrongdoing3. Judge a. Applies the law b. Instructs the jury c. Keeps proceedings fair and neutral d. May decide case if no jury4. Jury a. Decides facts of case b. Determines innocence or guilt
11A ruling that sets guidelines for future similar cases PrecedentA ruling that sets guidelines for future similar casesJurisdiction1. Define: a court’s right to hear a case2. Original jurisdiction (aka: trial court) a. First time a case is heard b. Establishes facts of case/determines innocence or guilt3. Appellate jurisdiction a. Higher court that reviews trial court decisions b. Does NOT retry the case; only determines if 1. Original proceedings were fair Law was correctly applied
12State courts 1. Deal with state laws 2. Three levels a. Trial courts b. Appellate courts (aka courts of appeal) c. State supreme court (aka court of final appeal)3. Cases may be appealed to the USSC if a federal or constitutional issue is involved
13Federal Courts1. Original jurisdiction over federal issues a. Federal laws b. Constitutional issues c. Resident of one state v resident of another state d. Treaties e. Maritime issues f. Foreign govt is involved g. US govt is involved2. Three levels a. Trial court (aka District Court) b. Appellate court (aka Court of Appeals) c. Supreme Court (aka Court of Final Appeal)
14The Federal Court System A. The Judiciary Act of Established the federal court system by dividing the country into federal judicial districts, creating district courts and courts of appeals
15District Courtsacross the country and US territories a. 89 throughout the states according to population distribution b. 1 each in D.C Puerto Rico Guam US Virgin Islands Mariana Islands2. Original jurisdiction over federal cases3. Territory District Courts also have original jurisdiction over local cases
16Courts of Appeals (aka Circuit Courts) across countrya. 12 hear appeals from district courtsb. 1 hears appeals from1. Special courts like claims court, tax court, etc2. Federal agencies like Office of Patents and Trademarks, Civil Service Commission, etc
17Federal Judges1. Appointed by president a. Advisors recommend candidates b. Professional background c. Political/social views d. Collegiate career2. Confirmed by Senate a. Judiciary cmte holds hearings b. Professional background c. Political/social views d. Simple majority vote
18Life termsa. Death b. Resignation/retirement c. Impeachment4. Balance rights of indv vs common good
19United States Supreme Court A. Judicial Review 1. Define: Power to overturn any Act of Congress or executive action the Court deems unconstitutional2. Is it in the Constitution? Not specifically stated; however, the Constitution says the Court shall “interpret the law”
20Established by Marbury v Madison (1803) a. Facts of the case: Marbury appointed to federal judgeship by outgoing Pres John Adams.New Pres TJ tells Sec State Madison NOT to deliver letter of appointment (Marbury can’t take his new job)Marbury sued in USSC citing right to do so in Fed Jud Act of 1789b. Justices considered both facts of case and law in question
21USSC issued opinion:Marbury was legally appointed as fed judge and Sec State Madison should deliver letter BUT the part of the Fed Jud Act of 1789 that said the USSC would hear this type of case is unconstitutional.The Constitution lists specific type cases the USSC has original jurisdiction over. This was not one of them.SO, because that part of law was unconstitutional, Marbury shouldn’t have sued in USSC and USSC doesn’t have authority to make Madison deliver the letter.
22Precedent set: THE CONSTITUTION IS WHAT THE SUPREME COURT SAYS IT IS First time Court interpreted the Constitution to the extent of declaring part of a law unconstitutional.This put the Jud Branch on equal footing with Leg and Exec branches because the Court has the power to declare acts of the others unconstitutional.***The US STILL has arguments over this issue!! Many people recognize this as constitutional, but many others say the Constitution is black and white and NOT subject to anyone’s interpretation—including the USSC
23Justices1. Appointed by president a. Advisors recommend candidates b. Professional background c. Political/social views d. Collegiate career2. Confirmed by Senate a. Judiciary com. holds hearings b. Professional background c. Political/social views d. Simple majority vote
24Life termsa. Death b. Resignation/retirement c. ImpeachmentWhy it matters!!Conservative presidents = conservative justicesLiberal presidents = liberal justicesJustices serve for yearsJustices interpret the Constitution; set precedentThose precedents affect all Americans
25A day in the life . . .1. Calendar a. Term: first Monday in October – end of June b. Sittings: 2-wk sessions when Justices hear cases then retire to decide opinions2. Selecting cases a. Original jurisdiction cases—must hear these 1. State govt v state govt Foreign rep a party in a caseb. Appellate jurisdiction cases—choose to hear1. Must deal with federal or constitutional issue Must impact a majority of citizens
26“Rule of Four”—four of the nine justices must agree to hear the indv case out of the 1000s of cases appealed to them.Case is on the docket (aka a court’s schedule or calendar)Briefs are submitted—written summary of each lawyer’s side of the caseJustices study lower court proceedings and briefsOral arguments Each side gets 30 mins to argue Justices get to ask questions
27Deliberationsa. CJ summarizes case and main points b. Group discussion, each presents views c. Justices vote—simple majority “wins”5. Opinions issued a. Define: written statement explaining ruling and reasons for reaching that decision b. Majority opinion: “winning” decision, sets precedent c. Concurring opinion: agree with majority opinion but for different reasons d. Dissenting opinion (aka minority opinion): disagree with majority opinion
28Factors influencing the Court 1. Constitution—fundamental law of US Precedent—are there past similar cases 3. Intent—of the Constitution and law(s) in question Social values—what is the current view of most Americans (will of the people) Personal judicial philosophy—to what extent should justices become involved in setting policy
29JUDICIAL PHILOSOPHY: An ongoing “discussion” in American politics about the extent to which justices/judges should involve themselves with setting policy. Judges don’t make laws so how does a judge set policy?JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: the Jud branch is an equal partner with the Leg and Exec and should be actively involved in interpreting and applying laws. Strong belief in judicial review.JUDICIAL RESTRAINT: the Jud branch should let the Leg and Exec branches set policy and only get involved if that policy is a flagrant violation of Constitution. Not a strong belief in judicial review.*NEITHER VIEW IS LIBERAL OR CONSERVATIVE*
30Checks on the Court1. Executive: pres appoints conservative or liberal justices/judges depending on his beliefs2. Legislative: Senate confirms appointees based on its majority’s beliefs3. Amendment process: a. How is this a check? USSC makes decision people REALLY don’t like. People persuade Congress to propose a constitutional amendment. If ratified by the states, it nullifies the USSC decision.
31b. Examples1. Dred Scott (1857) decision: Slave was property and not free just because he had lived in a free state. As property, and not a US citizen, he had no right to sue in federal court.14th Amendment (1868) : Declared former slaves to be US citizens with all rights of citizenship.This amendment nullified the Dred Scott decision.
32*****PLEASE NOTE***** Abortion????Flag burning????Gay marriage????Stem cell research????*****PLEASE NOTE*****The president CANNOT propose a constitutional amendment. WHY??