A Concise Historical Overview Cicero ( BCE ) Aristotle ( BCE ) St. Paul ( CE) Aquinas ( CE ) Hugo Grotius ( CE ) John Locke ( CE ) Pope Paul VI ( CE ) Pope John Paul II ( CE )
LAWS OF NATURE Universal laws of science understood by analysing the physical world. e.g. Copernicuss heliocentric universe or Einsteins Theory of Relativity. NATURAL LAW Descriptive Laws Simply stating what IS scientifically, factually the case Concerned with the moral law of how human beings should behave. It is understood by reflecting on human nature and rationally working out what leads to happiness. Prescriptive Laws Recommending a particular way of behaving; what one OUGHT to do. Clarifying the difference between Laws of Nature and Natural Law
Teleological Approach Teleological Good is something which fulfils its end purpose Aristotle Natural, distinctive end purpose of humanity is to be rational Reason discovers what is right by interpreting nature
Fulfilling Ones Natural, Distinctive, End Purpose Aristotle analysed nature carefully and was keen to categorise different species according to their nature. Ones nature determines the type of creature one becomes: A tadpole becomes a frog A foal becomes a horse. Aristotle was aware that human beings share qualities with other animals, such as desires and inclinations. Yet, the distinctive feature of human nature, which no other creature has, according to Aristotle, is the ability to be rational. So by following reason, as opposed to desires, humanity will be able to fulfil their natural, intended end purpose.
Thomas Aquinas Developed Aristotle's ideas As God created the world, ex nihilo, God is the author of the natural world Inherent divine design in nature may be discovered through human reason. (13 th Century)
Essentialist Foundation Natural law is objective, foundational & absolute Good: fulfil ones essence Evil: privation of goodness Falling short / missing the mark Imago dei (ideal plan for human beings) exists within the divine mind before creation Essence prior to existence
Essence Precedes Existence Christians believe that before the world and human beings were created, ex nihilo, by God, there existed within the divine mind an idea, or essence, of what it is to be fully human. Humans realise the `image and likeness of God when they fulfil this essence by living a life according to Gods plan which may be understood by: (1) Reason reflecting on nature (2) Being guided by the Bible (revealed word of God) Sin is understood as a `falling short of this idea, or essence, through the misuse of free will.
Thomas Aquinas Five Primary Principles To live To learn To reproduce To live in an ordered society To worship God Thomas Aquinas
Aquinas believed that for human beings: Life is the Supreme good – as it is the basis for all other goods. Education makes it possible for people to become independent and fully adult. Reproduction would ensure the continuation of the human race. Law and order would ensure that justice is upheld and that individuals are able to interact without fear of oppression. Worshipping God, the creator and sustainer of the world and humanity, offers fulfilment and love.
Order of Nature Order of Reason Order of Nature Order of Reason Aquinas 1. God is the author of nature 2. Reason comes from humanity THEREFORE 3. Natural law should take priority
Nature Is Superior To Reason Aquinas maintained that as nature is created by God, ex nihilo, it has an inherent design which reflects the will, purpose and goodness of the divine creator. Therefore in the medieval period the natural order of the world had greater status than human reason – as Gods design is superior to human reason. Furthermore, it was thought that a consequence of the Fall was the corruption of human reason.
Deontological DEONTOLOGYDEONTOLOGY Intrinsic goods Objective Absolute Nature of the Act itself Universal Application e.g. Pope Paul VI, Humanae Vitae, condemnation of artificial contraception. The nature of the act is wrong – absolutely.
A Frequent Point of Confusion Quite often examination boards use the terms deontological and teleological as though they are opposites. However, it is correct to assert that natural law is both deontological and teleological. As the example of the condemnation of artificial contraception shows, deontologically it is wrong as one has an obligation or duty to follow acts that are intrinsically good and this is defined by the Magisterium as anything which prevents the end purpose (teleology) from being fulfilled.
In matters of action it is most shameful to act against things as determined by nature (Aquinas) Explain why according to Aquinas Natural Law: 1. Homosexuality, 2. Masturbation and 3. Marital contraceptive sexual intercourse may be more sinful acts than: 4. Rape 5. Incest and 6. Adultery.
Papal Encyclicals based on Natural Law
Teleological Reason Natural order Aquinas Essentialist Foundational 5 Primary Principles Objective Evil: privation of good Intrinsic Natural Law Place the following in a coherent order Be sure to justify your sequence
Benefits of Natural Law
Natural Law offers a foundational, universal and absolute approach to ethics There will be one law eternal and unchangeable, binding at all times upon all peoples. (Cicero De Republica, 3.22) God had created the world Reason comprehends the five primary principles of Natural law Objective basis / foundation for ethics. Absolute and universally binding. Thomas Aquinas
Natural Law offers a foundational, universal and absolute approach to ethics The 21 st century is a post-modern world Nihilistic: rejects all traditional institutions and authority. Jean Baudrillard: No such thing as universal truth All theistic, meta-narratives are abandoned The individual is crowned king. Moral truth is relative. Jean Baudrillard Opposition to nihilism and relativism Roman Catholic Church: natural law Objective, deontological framework. Metaphysical, essentialist, foundation for truth and morality
Appeals to Theist and Atheist Importance of Human Life Intrinsic Values Aquinas Oscar Romero Grotius Jefferson Human beings United Nations Declaration Imago dei of Human Rights 1948 Upholds intrinsic Goods Law and Order Since Hugo Grotius natural law forms the basis for international law and order Roman Catholic Church and United Nations Working for Global Peace and Human Dignity
Natural Law is the Moral Foundation for The United Nations Declaration on Human Rights 1948 The inherent dignity and the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world. The 30 Articles include: 1. All humans are born free and equal in dignity and right. 2. Freedom and rights…. without distinction… such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political opinion, property status 5. No one shall be subject to torture…cruel degrading treatment 18. Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; …includes freedom to change religion or belief. 19. Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly.
However Eichmann was found guilty on the grounds that there is a more basic law than civil law, that is natural law, and he should not have acted contrary to natural law. i.e. people have intrinsic rights which should not be violated. The defence counsel for the trial of the Nazi SS officer Adolf Eichmann, (Jerusalem, 1961), for crimes against humanity i.e. genocide, was based upon the argument that Eichmann was simply following the civil law of Hitlers democratically elected National Socialist Party. He was simply doing his duty.
Natural Law does offer room for Human Creativity Natural Law Emphasis on physical nature gives a view of natural law which is objective, God given, and should not be interfered with by human beings. Naturally humanity has freedom of will and rationality and so may interact with nature for the benefit of humanity. Thomas Aquinas sought to bring these two strands together when he defined human rights as the rational ordering of a natural inclination. Paradox of natural law: laws of nature versus human reason
Natural Law The rational ordering of a natural inclination. (Thomas Aquinas) Natural inclinations are such things as food, shelter, law and order, reproduction which people innately desire for living. Unlike animals though, human beings have reason and so are capable of directing their inclinations to establish a moral code. Writing within an Aristotelian tradition the distinctive feature of human nature is reason and so morally good actions are those which are guided by reason to fulfil their natural end purpose.
A THIRD WAY A THIRD WAY Herbert Spencer Pope John Paul II Karl Marx Capitalism Western World Individual Money Communism Russia / China `From each according to his ability, to each according to need. (Marx) Rejected I N S T E A D NATURAL LAW In 1999 Pope John Paul II visited Cuba He condemned Capitalism for its financial oppression of developing countries e.g. supporting the campaign of `Breaking the chain of debt And Communist oppression of civil liberties e.g. Tiananmen Square Natural law is a way forward – upholding intrinsic values / liberties
Pope John Paul II ( ) Pope John Paul II ( ) Veritatis Splendor (Splendid Truth)1993 Evangelium Vitae (Gospel of Life) 1995 John Paul II rejected a culture of death Emphasis on the sanctity of human life not quality of life. Magisterium of the church as opposed to individual autonomy e.g. abortion and euthanasia.
Problems of Natural Law
Natural Law Too Biological and Dualistic Charles Curran argues that Natural law places too much emphasis on biological or physical processes in order to arrive at a moral theology. Such an approach is dualistic and sharply distinguishes body and soul. Confusion arises when it is assumed that it is possible to discover the moral, natural law by observing human biological structure. Rather a holistic approach is required which truly respects a persons rationality and ability to interact with the natural world order. Charles Curran
Natural Law Too Biological and Dualistic Charles Curran considers that there has been a vast change in outlook between the medieval period and the present day. He argues that before modern times people knew they could not control nature, and therefore they thought principally of conforming to it. Reason then became identified with the order of nature. By contrast we live in a scientific and technological society. We know of the endless process of change in the natural world. And we know that human beings can in many ways intervene in natural processes and shape the world for greater human happiness. Charles Curran
1.The Cairo Conference, 1994, highlighted problems of overpopulation, particularly in developing counties. 2.Spread of S.T.D.s. In Africa HIV abounds. 3.Denies women autonomy to control their fertility. Ironically the availability of cheap artificial contraception e.g. the pill, has revolutionised womens rights, 1960s. 4.Consequences of restrictive laws – a number of Roman Catholic laity rejected the encyclical. Humanae Vitae 1968 Artificial Contraception Pope Paul VI Analysis/ Evaluation/ Implications/ Analysis/Evaluation/Implications Possible benefits of practising artificial contraception In 1968 Pope Paul VI issued Humanae Vitae which condemned the use of artificial contraception as an intrinsic evil as it is contrary to the teachings of natural law.
Darwinian Revolution Challenges Darwinian Revolution Challenges Natural Laws Essentialist Foundation Natural law is objective, foundational & absolute Good: fulfil ones essence Evil: privation of goodness Falling short / missing the mark Essence prior to existence Imago dei (ideal plan for human beings) exists within the divine mind before creation Darwin and Dawkins Natural Selection has explained away the need for a designer God, and so undermines any sense of an ideal human nature within the divine mind.
The very premise of Roman Catholic teaching about natural law – i.e. one ideal view of human nature existing before creation within the divine mind is challenged by …..Charles Darwin and Richard Dawkins. Darwinian Natural Selection offers a comprehensive account as to why there is design in the world: design occurs through a process of step by step evolution guided by non random survival. (Dawkins) Design does not lie in the past, but is continually evolving; so if anything design is seen to lie in the future. Talk of artificial contraception as being unnatural, a falling short of Gods intended purpose, makes no sense at all – there is nothing to fall short of.
Hetero? Homo? Auto? Bi? Bestial? In vitro? AIH AID Surgical Sperm Recovery? A serious criticism of Natural Law is that it is questionable as to whether there is just one universally accepted view of human nature. e.g. within the arena of sexual ethics it is argued that 5-10% of people are naturally gay or lesbian. This criticism undermines the absolute understanding of natural law – as a person who is naturally (genetically) gay is being good when having homosexual intercourse as this fulfils their natural end purpose, as designed by God. Only ONE human nature? e.g. sexuality
Natural Law: Only One End Purpose? According to Roman Catholic teaching the natural end purpose of sexual intercourse is reproduction. A man should never make love to his wife for pleasure. When it was necessary to make love to produce children the man should descend with a certain sense of sadness to his regrettable task. (St. Augustine, Confessions) However the Church of England considers sexual intercourse may be unitive or procreative. Sex being a beautiful gift from God to be shared in marriage. Indeed, the Vatican II Council agreed that sexual intercourse could be procreative and unitive, though note, the key word here, due to natural law, is AND. Rowan Williams Paul VI
Only ONE sexual position? Only ONE sexual position? (St Albert the Great – Aquinas esteemed teacher) Nature teaches that the proper position for intercourse is that the woman should be on her back and that the man lie on her belly…and women conceive more easily in this position than in others…Intercourse sideways is a minor deviation from this, sitting is greater, standing is greater still, and greatest of all is from behind, like beasts of burden. Some people have said that this last is a mortal sin, but I disagree with this. ( Sentences ). Analysis/ Evaluation/ Implications/ Analysis/Evaluation/Implications
Only One Human Nature? Only One Human Nature? The View of Thomas Hobbes Hobbes recommended the need for a Leviathan – a ruler who would have the right to force people to comply. Such a view of human nature runs counter to that of Aquinas and has serious implications for the morality of human beings. Analysis/ Evaluation/ Implications/ Analysis/Evaluation/Implications Thomas Hobbes took a rather pessimistic view of human nature, thinking Life is isolated, nasty, brutish and short.
Copernican Revolution Copernican Revolution In The Field of Ethics So too there should be a rejection of Aristotles natural law which holds an outdated biological, dualistic approach to ethics Personhood as a Way Forward Quality of Human Life Is Greater Than Sanctity of Human Life (Copernicus) Natural Law Personhood SINGERSINGER Copernicus challenged Aristotles geocentric (earth centred) universe
The Sanctity of Human Life, from the moment of conception, has been challenged by: Charles Darwin, Origin of the Species, challenged the Biblical view that human beings were created in the imago dei with his theory of natural selection. Human beings are part of the evolutionary ladder. Advances in medical technology means that it is able to prolong human life. e.g. life support machines, even though the quality of life may be minimal. An increasingly secular society: rationalism, empiricism and biological reductionism have challenged metaphysical ideas of the human soul.
Is Natural Law Applicable For Today? Co-education? Condemned in 1931, by Pope Pius XI, in Divini Illius Magistri, as being unnatural. Accepted as perfectly natural by Lord Sutherland, Chief Inspector of Schools, 1992 Lord Sutherland Pope Pius XI Lord WinstonPope Paul VI Pope Pius XIISigmund Freud Masturbation? In Vitro Fertilization? Unnatural self abuse, sinful, every sperm is sacred? Interfering with God given nature? Healthy adolescent sexual development? Using reason to meet infertile couples natural desire to become parents?
The Magisterium is Too Authoritative and a Challenge to Personal Autonomy Hans Kung regards the Catholic Church as being too authoritarian. He thinks the Roman Catholic church is operating with a Medieval world view ethic where Nature is held to be superior to reason. In Humani Generis (1950) Pope Pius XII declared that when a pope makes a judgement then theologians may no longer freely debate the subject. Hans Kung Pius XI Pius XII Paul VI John Paul II
Case Studies Application of Natural Law To Moral Issues
Reproductive Cloning of Human Embryos? Dr Seed and Dr Zavos have undertaken considerable research with the aim of cloning human embryos. Dr Seed and Dr Zavos consider naturally infertile women have the right to have a baby. Currently reproductive cloning is banned by HFEA - the Human and Fertilization Embryology Authority. What might a supporter of natural law think? Dr Seed
Reproductive Cloning of Human Embryos? Dr Seed Scientific Researcher Pope John Paul II Roman Catholic Church Some further points to consider… Human life, a gift from God, created imago dei, is sacred from the moment of conception. Embryo cloning involves researching on, and killing, innocent human embryos. Human beings are stewards of the world – should not play God. Is there a difference between reproductive (illegal)and therapeutic (legal) cloning? Future implications: designer babies? Genetic apartheid? Life begins at birth, not conception. Relief to the suffering of infertile women / couples. Benefit of scientific technology. Consequences of restrictive laws? If banned in the UK might scientists go to the Ukraine with no regulatory bodies, such as HFEA, to monitor research. Ability to predict long term consequences with accuracy? Dolly the sheep died prematurely
Detaining Terrorist Suspects At Guantanamo Bay? Detaining Terrorist Suspects At Guantanamo Bay? The USA Bush administration have imprisoned 660 illegal non-combatants at Guantanamo Bay. The USA forces detained the 660 suspects during their `War Against Terror campaign against the Taliban in Afghanistan, The USA government have termed the suspected terrorists as illegal non-combatants and consequently they are not entitled to the protection of the Geneva convention, a lawyer or the Red Cross. The 660 illegal non-combatants have been detained for over 2 years, without charge. It is proposed that they may be tried by a USA Military Tribunal as opposed to in an independent court of international law. What might an ethicist of natural law think? George Bush
Detaining Terrorist Suspects At Guantanamo Bay? An infringement of human rights detaining suspects without trial. Questionable to deny people the rights of the Geneva Convention just because one has deemed to call them illegal combatants as opposed to `prisoners of war. This seems strange as they were detained during the USA campaign: War Against Terror. Detainees should be entitled to a fair trial – by an international court of justice; not an American Military Tribunal, with the possibility of capital punishment `War Against Terror is upholding international law and order. It is legitimate to detain suspect terrorists for the protection of innocent people throughout the world. Guantanamo Bay acts as a deterrent to other would-be illegal combatants and so upholds law and order. Capital Punishment is the `ultimate justice to those who have killed innocent people. George Bush President of USA Rowan Williams Archbishop of Canterbury Some further points to consider…
QALYS QALYS Quality Adjusted Life Years Cost of operation Numbers of Years Benefit COST – BENEFIT ANALYSIS
QALYS: Quality Adjusted Life Years QALYS: Quality Adjusted Life Years A Doctors dilemma… Patient A 20 years old Requires hip replacement. Cost: £5, 000 Years benefit: 50 years 1 unit QALY = £100 Patient B 65 years old Requires hip replacement Cost: £5, 000 Years Benefit: 5 years 1 unit QALY = £1, 000 You are the doctor, accountable for your hospitals annual budget, whom do you treat and why?
Legalise Voluntary Euthanasia? Public Opinion Polls in the UK show that the majority of people would like to see voluntary euthanasia legalised. e.g. 82% The UK is an increasingly secular society where the Quality of Life is considered to be more important than the sanctity of human life. 20% of patients in Intensive Care Units are being treated with no likelihood of survival. Would a supporter of natural law agree with the legalisation of voluntary euthanasia?
Legalise Voluntary Euthanasia? Legalise Voluntary Euthanasia? Some further points to consider… Pius XII John Paul II Hippocrates Williams Kevorkian Would voluntary euthanasia undermine the role of the doctor? (cf. the Hippocratic oath, the medical duty to preserve innocent human life.) Is the current law of `the principle of double effect satisfactory in a secular society? Consequences of restrictive laws? Will people pursue a policy of illegal euthanasia? Would legalising voluntary euthanasia pressurise vulnerable members of society? (The Church of England concern, On Dying Well 1993) Just because public opinion favours voluntary euthanasia does such relativism make it right?
Socrates Says Links
Teleological Approach Teleological Good is something which fulfils its end purpose Aristotle The natural, distinctive end purpose of humanity is to be rational Reason discovers what is right by interpreting nature
Cicero Cicero ( BC) Works: On Laws, On Duty, De Republica `The law will not lay down one rule in Rome and another in Athens… There will be one law eternal and unchangeable, binding at all times upon all peoples. (De Republica 3:22) Cicero asserted that as all human beings are rational, societies should be formed on the basis of individuals exercising their freedom and rights. Equally people should recognise their b…natural responsibilities and duties to their B……fellow human beings – as all share in the ……. spark of reason.
St Paul St Paul (2-65 CE) St Paul did NOT explicitly advocate Natural law as a theory of ethics, preferring to follow Jesus teachings. However, in Romans 2:15 Paul does argue that there is an innate sense of justice which God has given to ALL human beings, irrespective of their religion,..when gentiles, who do not have the law (religious) do by nature things required by the law.. they show that the requirements of the law are written on their hearts.. (2:15) Such a law is the unwritten law, the natural moral law, the law of God.
Thomas Aquinas Thomas Aquinas ( CE) Following the crusades many of Aristotles. works were translated into Latin. Aristotle deeply influenced Aquinas.views and Aquinas sought to bring together Aristotles ideas within Christian teaching. Aquinas argued that whilst all people ….. have access to natural law, due to …… their rational abilities, nevertheless …. it was God who was the author of B…… natural law as God created the ….…. world and human beings, imago dei.
Hugo Grotius Hugo Grotius ( CE ) Works: On the Law of War and Peace Grotius was a humanist who pioneered the ideas of `natural morality and the social contract theory of the State. Natural law is independent of religion and defines things as good or bad by their own nature, through reason. Grotius was responsible for natural law.. being applied internationally to states … as a universal basis for a `just war b….tradition of ethics.
John Locke John Locke (( CE ) Two Treatises of Government According to Locke human beings have inalienable rights as they are created by God and have reason and conscience to guide them in knowing right from wrong. The duty of the state is to protect the natural rights of individual liberty and private property. Locke challenged the idea that a monarchy could dictate laws to citizens. Citizens have the natural right to form social contracts for themselves and should not have laws imposed upon them.
Pope Paul VI Pope Paul VI ( CE) Humanae Vitae (Human Life) 1968 Pope Paul VI condemned acts such as abortion and the use of artificial contraception as being intrinsically evil as they are opposed to the teaching of natural law. …the direct interruption of the generative process already begun, even if used for therapeutic reasons, are to be absolutely excluded as licit means of procreation. (Humanae Vitae)
Pope John Paul II Pope John Paul II ( ) Veritatis Splendor (Splendid Truth)1993 Evangelium Vitae (Gospel of Life) 1995 John Paul II has repeatedly rejected a culture of death that has permeated the Western world with its emphasis on the quality of life, individual autonomy and campaigns to legalise abortion and euthanasia. Pope John Paul II has maintained an approach of intrinsic goods and evils based on the objective, universal and unchanging principles of natural law.
Homosexuality, masturbation and marital contraceptive sexual intercourse do not allow for the possibility of natural procreation and so according to Aquinas understanding of natural law such acts may be considered to be more sinful than rape, incest and adultery. Equally, one may argue that the acts of rape, incest and adultery are more sinful as they undermine an ordered society and do not respect the intrinsic rights of innocent people unlike consenting acts of homosexuality, masturbation and marital contraceptive sexual intercourse.
In an examination it is useful to be able to make reference to Papal Encyclicals (documents) as they offer a source of external authority to help justify assertions. Papal Encyclicals form part of the Magisterium of the Roman Catholic church and therefore show an appreciation of tradition within Catholic theology. The Encyclicals, best referred to by their Latin name, show how natural law is applied to particular moral issues. Identifying the correct Pope with the relevant Encyclical, with a short quotation, is often helpful.
Natural Law Teleological Reason Natural order Aquinas Essentialist Foundational 5 Primary Principles Objective Evil: privation of good Intrinsic Explain the following suggested order
Explain Natural Law Natural law adopts a deontological approach to morality as it is concerned with intrinsic goods, the nature of the act itself. Natural law became prominent through the writing of Aristotle who argued that because reason is the distinctive feature of humanity people are able to use their reason to discover the teleological goal of human nature. For Aristotle something is good if it fulfils its natural end purpose. Thomas Aquinas, 13 th century, developed Aristotles teaching on natural law, incorporating it into Christian theology, arguing that as God created the world ex nihilo there is an inherent design in the world of nature which humanity, using reason, can discover and so follow the divine end purpose of the creation.
Due to the essentialist theological foundation, (e.g the idea of human beings created in the image of God, existing within the divine mind prior to creation), natural law considers evil to be a privation of goodness, a falling short of our intended purpose Aquinas argued that there are five primary principles, which when followed will lead to human happiness. These principles, which human reason discerns are: to live, to learn, to reproduce, to live in an ordered society and to worship God. As natural law has an essentialist foundation it is applicable to all people (as there is one human nature) and so it is universal and absolute in its approach; concerned with intrinsic goods. The Magisterium of the Roman Catholic church upholds natural law e.g. In 1968 Pope Paul VI condemned artificial contraception in the papal encyclical Humanae Vitae (Human Life) as the Aristotelian efficient cause of sexual intercourse is prevented from fulfilling its final cause, human life.
Natural Law is too rigid to be of any use as an ethical theory in todays society. Todays secular society encourages individual autonomy, where peoples freedom is respected, and they are free to make decisions that will make them happy. Natural law, as presented by Magisterium of the Catholic church, can be oppressive, allowing no exceptions (as natural law is deontological) particularly in the area of sexual ethics. For example, Paul VI, Humanae Vitae, denies couples the right to use artificial contraception. This can lead to overpopulation and unsustainable growth, a concern raised during the Cairo Conference in 1994, as well as the spread of STDs and possible abortions of unwanted pregnancies.
Natural Law is too rigid to be of any use as an ethical theory in todays society. It is significant that both Aristotle and Aquinas considered that the final telos of natural law is human happiness, which Aquinass 5 primary principles promote. For example, New Labour adopts NL in its social policy for law and order, offering an ordered society e.g. trying to reduce crimes which are committed to feed hedonistic drug habits. But within the arena of medical ethics a Copernican revolution has happened. The sanctity of human life has been challenged by quality of life (e.g. Bob Crowe and voluntary euthanasia / Advanced Directives) and the criteria of personhood, by Peter Singer. I think a persons autonomy, rationality and sentience are more important than following natural law, a Medieval ethic for a world prior to the Enlightenment / Age of Reason
Pope Paul VIs Humanae Vitae is a helpful encyclical to quote in the examination room as it raises so many issues which may be analysed and evaluated. However, it is worth remembering that the churchs condemnation of the use of artificial contraception does not represent the full picture of Roman Catholic teaching on natural law. Sometimes students are derogatory about natural law when applied to artificial contraception and miss the benefits of natural law when applied to social ethics e.g. upholding intrinsic human rights.