Presentation on theme: "Msgr Charles J. Scicluna Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith"— Presentation transcript:
1 Msgr Charles J. Scicluna Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith Delicta GravioraIus ProcessualeA Presentation byMsgr Charles J. SciclunaPromoter of JusticeCongregation for the Doctrine of the Faith
2 on the Motu Proprio Sacramentorum sanctitatis tutela (30 April 2001) A Short Commentaryon the Motu Proprio Sacramentorum sanctitatis tutela (30 April 2001)and the Praxis of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith
4 Guiding PrinciplesThe body of canonical norms that [the CDF] is called to apply with justice and equity strives to guarantee both the exercise of the right of defence of the accused and the demands of the common good.John Paul II, Address to the Plenary of the CDF, 6 February 2004
5 Address to the Plenary of the CDF, Guiding PrinciplesOnce the offence has been proven, it is necessary in each case to assess carefully both the just principle of proportionality between fault and punishment, as well as the predominant need to protect the entire People of God.John Paul II,Address to the Plenary of the CDF,6 February 2004
6 Address to the Plenary of the CDF, [The protection of the People of God] does not only depend on the application of canonical penal law. Its best guarantee is the correct and balanced formation of future priests who are explicitly called to embrace with joy and generosity that humble, modest and chaste lifestyle that is the practical basis of ecclesiastical celibacy.John Paul II,Address to the Plenary of the CDF,6 February 2004Guiding Principles
7 Ratio legumCanonical procedures are designed to protect the innocent and at the same time to mete out just punishment to the guilty.This end is pursued by:ascertaining the true facts of the case,guaranteeing the right of self-defence,presuming the innocence of the accused until he is proven guilty (or confesses to the crime).
8 and the ensuing Preliminary Investigation IIThe Notitia Criminisand the ensuing Preliminary Investigation
9 A. The Notitia Criminisdenunciation by the victim: credibility of the person; motivesdenunciation by third parties: reliability; motives for reportmedia reportsreferral by the statutory authoritiesadmission of the cleric: forum internum non-sacramentale; forum externum
10 B. The Preliminary Investigation The focused referral of the matter reported: alleged perpetrator; alleged victim; time; place; acts or actionsThe credibility of the allegations in themselvesThe credibility or reliability of the sourceNotoriety/Publicity of the accusations
11 The Preliminary Investigation: Ways and Means respectful of both canon and civil law;professional and not amateur;mindful of the demands of the common good;not forgetful of the rights and dignity of both the Alleged Perpetrator and the Alleged Victim;undertaken by any person delegated ad hoc by the Ordinary;put on record in writinginitiated and closed by decree of the Ordinary
12 C. Follow-up to the investigation The decision as to what should be done by way of follow-up is to be taken by the Bishop, after having prudently consulted the Promoter of Justice and the Local Review BoardAllegations which are clearly unfounded or unreliable should be dismissed as suchOther Allegations should be examined carefully
13 D. Referral to Local Review Boards Full compliance with diocesan policiesTransparency of proceedingsConfidentialityRole of Alleged VictimRole of Alleged PerpetratorRole of Lawyers
14 E. Referral to Statutory Authorities Local civil laws should be respectedCourt orders should be followedLocal Ecclesiastical Authorities should always bear in mind that concessions praeter legem to civil authorities concerning access to confidential or secret archives create a presumption of waiver of privilege and could harm the legitimate right to Church liberty
15 F. Referral for Psychological Evaluation Such referral should meet the demands of moral theology, human dignity, the common goodIt is not necessary in every GD case and should not be used for undue pressureThe accused may reject such referral but will also have to face the consequences of his decision to refuse it: stante dubio de idoneitate ministerium impediendum est
16 G. “Adminstrative Leave” The ministry of the Accused cleric should pro bono Ecclesiae be immediately limited if there is an indication that it may constitute a risk for minors or a scandal to the faithful.
17 H. Dealing with the Alleged Victim The dignity and right to privacy of the alleged victim should be safeguardedTherapy offered to the alleged victim should be reasonable and effectiveExtra-judicial settlement of allegations should not be construed as hush-money
19 The duty to refer: SST Art 13 Quoties Ordinarius vel Hierarcha notitiam saltem verisimilem habeat [cfr can CIC] de delicto reservato,investigatione prævia peracta,eam significet Congregationi pro Doctrina Fideiquæ [… *] Ordinarium vel Hierarcham ad ulteriora procedere iubet,[*] nisi ob peculiaria rerum adiuncta causam sibi advocet,firmo tamen iure appellandi contra sententiam primi gradus tantummodo ad Supremum Tribunal eiusdem Congregationis.
20 The duty to refer: SST Art. 13 Whenever the Ordinary or Hierarch receives a report of a reserved delict which has at least a semblance of truth [notitiam saltem verisimilem],once the preliminary investigation has been completed,he is to communicate the matter to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the FaithWhich […*] will direct the Ordinary or Hierarch [how] to proceed further,[*] unless it calls the case to itself due to particular circumstances,with due regard, however, for the right to appeal against a sentence of the first instance only to the Supreme Tribunal of the same Congregation.
21 WHICH CASES MUST be referred to the CDF? All cases involving graviora delictaReported or committed after 30 April 2001Where the allegation is not manifestly falseWhere the accused is still aliveIrrespective of statute of limitations
22 “HISTORICAL CASES” GD cases reported before 30.04.2001 WHAT ABOUT REFERRAL TO CDF?Where case has already been tackled: NO NEEDWhere no action was taken: MAYWhere action is now contemplated: MUST[CAVEAT: Appeals and Recourses concerning GD historical cases MUST be referred to the CDF]
23 Standard Information: WHAT TO SEND TO THE CDFStandard Information:- Personal Data and CV of the Accused- Details of Allegations- Details of Civil Proceedings (Criminal; Civil Liability)
24 Ancillary Information: WHAT TO SEND TO THE CDFAncillary Information:- Expert Advice (Risk Assessment; Psychological Evaluations)- Notoreity of Accusations and impact on the faithful- Details of present canonical status of accused including sustenance
25 Elements Necessary for Evaluation WHAT TO SEND TO THE CDFElements Necessary for Evaluationof the Case:- Response of the Accused (if available)-Votum of the Ordinary concerning procedure & expediency of any future ministry.
26 Summary of Case following standard tabulate provided by the CDF WHAT TO SEND TO THE CDFThe Tabella:Summary of Case following standard tabulate provided by the CDF[ … ]
27 The Tabella Available from the CDF Should be filled in all cases Indicates essential informationShould be corroborated by documentsShould be sent to the CDF with all the material available
28 Notanda re: Referral of Cases to the CDF The CDF will appreciate as much information as possible on the preliminary investigation and the findings of the diocesan review boards or equivalent consultative organs.Thevotum of the Ordinary concerning the merits of the case and the procedures and measures to be adopted is of the utmost importanceThe Accused and his Canonical Advocate are encouraged to make representations to the CDF at an early stage
29 The discretion exercised by the CDF [Described in CIC 1718 §1;previously pertained to the Ordinary]Whether one can proceed with a penal processWhether it is expedient can. 1341Whether the case should be resolved through process (judicial or extra-judicial) or through some other meansWhether the CDF will mandate the local instances or take on the case directly
30 Who takes the decision? Is it subject to review? The decision is taken in Congressu Particulari [CP] which is composed of the Cardinal Prefect, the Archbishop Secretary, the Under-Secretary, the Promoter of Justice. The decision is ultimately the responsibility of the chair (the Prefect or the Secretary)The CDF considers requests for revocation or amendment of such decisionsAlthough rarely used, the CDF also has the authority preemptively to consider the question of damages ( cfr can. 1718, § 4)
31 Options of the CDF Request for direct intervention of the Holy Father Authorisation of a Penal ProcessDeclaration, Authorisation or Confirmation of Disciplinary Non-Penal Measures
32 Direct intervention of the Supreme Pontiff IVDirect intervention of the Supreme Pontiff
34 Dimissio ex officioVery grave cases, especially where custodial sentences have been inflicted by the civil authorities, will be considered by the CDF for direct referral to the Holy Father.The priest concerned should first be asked whether he wants to ask for laicization and he should be accorded an opportunity to express himself on the matter.The CDF asks for a dispensation from clerical celibacy in each case.
35 Once the Holy Father decrees dismissal from the clerical state and the Diocese is notified of the decree, the local Ordinary should ensure that the dismissed cleric is not left without some sort of financial support (can. 1350, §2).
36 There is no recourse or appeal against the decision of the Holy Father. In cases of sexual abuse of minors, the Ordinary is authorised to publish and explain the reasons of the dismissal if the common good (including the safety of minors) requires such action.
37 Dispensatio ab oneribus The CDF considers and processes requests by clerics (who admit having committed one of the delicta graviora) to be dispensed from the obligations of the clerical state including celibacy.
39 Types Judicial penal process Administrative / Extra-judicial penal process
40 Decision for a Judicial Process (SST art. 13) in the diocesecoram Congregatione: advocatioCondicio: appellatio semper ad CDF: SST art. 14
41 Judicial Penal Procedures These judicial procedures have to be authorised by the CDF.First Instance Tribunals: Diocesan bishops are invited to constitute their own first instance tribunals for graviora delicta cases.Any requests for dispensations concerning personnel should be referred to the CDF.
42 Second Instance CDF Tribunals: Second Instance has been reserved exclusively to the CDF.The CDF is however open to the possibility of nominating local canon lawyers as ad hoc judges of its Supreme Tribunal. The CDF will invite the local bishops to suggest names of canon lawyers of good repute who would be CDF judges and promoters of justice nominated by the CDF.
43 Administrative Penal Procedures On 7 February 2003 the Holy Father John Paul II authorised a derogation of the MP SST art.7, permitting Administrative Penal Procedures for cases involving graviora delicta.The use of this administrative procedure has to be authorised by the CDF.It involves the application of can that should be followed closely.
44 Canon 1720If the Ordinary believes that the matter should proceed by way of an extra-judicial decree:He is to notify the accused of the allegation and the proofs, and give an opportunity for defence, unless the accused, having been lawfully summoned, has failed to appear;Together with two assessors he is accurately to weigh all the proofs and arguments;If the offence is certainly proven and a time for criminal proceedings has not elapsed, he is to issue a decree in accordance with cann , stating at least in summary form the reasons in law and in fact.
45 CDF Praxis concerning can. 1720 It should be clear that the Ordinary may freely decree a penalty short of dismissal from the clerical state.If he deems it expedient and appropriate that dismissal be decreed, he should refer the matter to the CDF and transmit all the acts of the case.The Prefect on behalf of the CDF will then decide whether or not to decree dismissal.Recourse to the Ordinary Session of the CDF (Feria IV) is possible against the decision of the Prefect.
46 Administrative penal procedure (can. 1720) If the Ordinary believes that the matter should proceed by way of an extra-judicial decree:He is to notify the accused of the allegation and the proofs, and give an opportunity for defence, unless the accused, having been lawfully summoned, has failed to appear;Together with two assessors he is accurately to weigh all the proofs and arguments;If the offence is certainly proven and a time for criminal proceedings has not elapsed, he is to issue a decree in accordance with cann , stating at least in summary form the reasons in law and in fact.
48 Disciplinary Measures Usually involve a limitation of ministryMay involve removal from direct pastoral ministry (which is not dismissal from the clerical state)Mainly decreed intuitu boni communiThe sustenance of the cleric has to be guaranteed
49 Examples of Administrative Measures Removal from Parish (cann – 1747)Removal from any other ecclesiastical office (cann. 192 – 195)Withdrawal of faculty to preach (can. 764); to hear confessions (can. 974); administer the sacraments and sacramentals (can. 835)Declaration of impediment from exercising Holy Orders (can. 1044, § 2, 2°)Any decision which affects the exercise of a person’s rights and duties (can. 223 § 2)
50 Remedies against Disciplinary Measures A person subject to administrative measures has the right to hierarchical recourse to the CDF to contest the measures taken against him by the local Ordinary.There is a right to further recourse to the Feria Quarta to contest the measures taken by the Prefect of the CDF in congressu particulari.
51 Recourses before the CDF Request for Revocation or Amendment;Hierarchical Recourse to the CDFRecourse to the Feria IV of the CDF
52 A Brief Check-list for appraising a particular administrative act canonical jurisdiction and executive power of the authorvalidity of the act according to the general normsvalidity of the act according to any special normsis the act lawful or licit according to both the general and the specific norms applicable to it;has the law been followed as to the merit of the decision (in decernendo);has the law been followed as to the procedure applicable to the case (in procedendo)?is the act prudent and expedient?;does it promote the common good?;does the act respect the principles of natural justice?does the act respect Church doctrine concerning liturgy, dogmatic and moral theology?
53 Request for Revocation or Amendment Can :§ 1 Quid sit§ 2 peremptory time-limit (10 canonical days)This stage is not optional. Exception: can. 1734, § 3, n. 3NHas to be made in writing and include reasons for requestRequest for suspension of the act implied ex can. 1734, § 1
54 What are the options available to the Bishop in the case of a request for revocation or amendment of his decision?Can. 1735: (answer within 30 days of the receipt of the request for revocation).The Bishop may:revoke his decision (cf. cann. 47 and 58).substitute his decision with a new onedecide to confirm his decision and therefore reject the request for revocation or amendmentdecide not to respond to the request for revocation, (hierarchical recourse possible ex silentio)The question of suspension:to be settled within ten days of the receipt of the request for revocation (can. 1736, § 2).
55 Hierarchical Recourse to the Holy See Having received an answer which still aggrieves himorhaving received no answer within thirty days of the Bishop’s receipt of the request for revocation,the petitioner or recurrent has the right to make hierarchical recourse (can. 1737, § 1).The competent hierarchical superior in cases of graviora delicta: the Congregation of the Doctrine of the FaithTime-limit: peremptory; fifteen canonical days of the notification of the new decree or response of the Bishop (can. 1737, § 2).Presentation of arguments;a copy of all the necessary documentation;the question of damages
56 The Dicastery subjects the recourse to a preliminary check-list: Does the subject-matter fall under the competence of the Dicastery?;Does the recurrent or petitioner have legal-standing?;Has the request for revocation or amendment been previously made to the Bishop?;Have the time-limits for the request for revocation and for hierarchical recourse been respected?Failure on one of these preliminary tests = rejection in limine by the Dicastery.
57 The Procedure at the CDF (Regolamento Generale della Curia Romana, art The Procedure at the CDF (Regolamento Generale della Curia Romana, art. 136, § 1; cann ; )CDF asks for the comments of the Bishop on the merits of the recourse (can. 50).CDF may also ask the petitioner for further details or documents.Can (the right for legal representation)CDF may suspend the administrative act of the Bishop (can. 1737, § 3)The Dicastery considers an equitable resolution of the contention (can. 1733, § 3)Possible extension of the three-month period for answering ex can. 57, § 1 (RGCR, art. 136, § 2)
58 The Procedure at the CDF (Regolamento Generale della Curia Romana, art The Procedure at the CDF (Regolamento Generale della Curia Romana, art. 136, § 1; cann ; )Decisions are taken by the Superiors of the CDF: the Cardinal Prefect or the Archbishop Secretary during the Congresso Particolare or Feria VI [Feria Sexta].The CDF as hierarchical Superior therefore has the authority* to substitute the discretion of the Bishop with its own;* to declare the administrative act null and void;* to annul or rescind the act;* to change or modify the act of the Bishop.
59 Recourse to the Feria IV of the CDF Regolamento Generale della Curia Romana, art. 135two types of recourse against administrative acts issued by a Roman Dicastry:- Art. 135, § 1: request for revocation- Art. 135, § 2: recourse to the Apostolic Signatura re: alleged violations of the law in decernendo or in procedendo according to art. 123 of Pastor bonus.Decision of the Pope ex audientia diei 14 Februarii a. 2003: in the case of decisions of the CDF concerning graviora delicta these two recourses should be only directed to and exclusively decided by the Feria IV of the CDF
60 Elements of the Procedure before the Feria IV / 1 Preliminary questions are addressed in limineThe Secretary asks the recurrent party to present documents and arguments for the recourse.The parties are free to nominate advocates and procurators and they are both given the chance to present their respective arguments
61 Elements of the Procedure before the Feria IV / 2 The Disciplinary Office prepares a Relazione d’Ufficio which ends with a Dubium to be presented to the Feria IV for decision.All the acts of the case are handed over to the Promoter of Justice for his votum.Copies of the main documents, recourses, briefs, Relazione, and votum Promotoris Iustitiae are distributed to the members of the Congregation in preparation for their meeting or Feria IV.
62 Elements of the Procedure before the Feria IV / 3 The Feria IV will consider the recourse as to its merits as well as to the alleged violations of the law.The Feria IV enjoys the same wide spectrum of possibilities concerning its decision which can gives to the hierarchical Superior with respect to hierarchical recourseThe decision of the Ordinary Congregation (Feria IV) is not subject to any recourse and is therefore definitive.It is communicated to the parties concerned.The CDF itself oversees the execution of the decisions taken by the Feria IV.