Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1
**Statistics for Business and Economics**

Chapter 9 Categorical Data Analysis

2
**Learning Objectives Explain 2 Test for Proportions**

Explain 2 Test of Independence Solve Hypothesis Testing Problems More Than Two Population Proportions Independence As a result of this class, you will be able to ...

3
Data Types Data Quantitative Qualitative Continuous Discrete 3

4
Qualitative Data Qualitative random variables yield responses that classify Example: gender (male, female) Measurement reflects number in category Nominal or ordinal scale Examples What make of car do you drive? Do you live on-campus or off-campus?

5
**Hypothesis Tests Qualitative Data**

Z Test c 2 Test Proportion Independence 1 pop. More than 2 pop. 5

6
**Chi-Square (2) Test for k Proportions**

7
**Hypothesis Tests Qualitative Data**

Z Test c 2 Test Proportion Independence 1 pop. More than 2 pop. 5

8
**Multinomial Experiment**

n identical trials k outcomes to each trial Constant outcome probability, pk Independent trials Random variable is count, nk Example: ask 100 people (n) which of 3 candidates (k) they will vote for

9
**Chi-Square (2) Test for k Proportions**

Tests equality (=) of proportions only Example: p1 = .2, p2=.3, p3 = .5 One variable with several levels Uses one-way contingency table

10
**One-Way Contingency Table**

Shows number of observations in k independent groups (outcomes or variable levels) Outcomes (k = 3) Candidate Tom Bill Mary Total 35 20 45 100 Number of responses 20

11
**Conditions Required for a Valid Test: One-way Table**

A multinomial experiment has been conducted The sample size n is large: E(ni) is greater than or equal to 5 for every cell

12
**2 Test for k Proportions Hypotheses & Statistic**

Hypothesized probability 1. Hypotheses H0: p1 = p1,0, p2 = p2,0, ..., pk = pk,0 Ha: At least one pi is different from above 2. Test Statistic Observed count Expected count: E(ni) = npi,0 3. Degrees of Freedom: k – 1 Number of outcomes 24

13
2 Test Basic Idea Compares observed count to expected count assuming null hypothesis is true Closer observed count is to expected count, the more likely the H0 is true Measured by squared difference relative to expected count Reject large values

14
**Finding Critical Value Example**

What is the critical 2 value if k = 3, and =.05? If ni = E(ni), 2 = 0. Do not reject H0 c 2 Upper Tail Area DF .995 … .95 .05 1 ... 0.004 3.841 0.010 0.103 5.991 2 Table (Portion) Reject H0 = .05 df = k - 1 = 2 5.991 26

15
**2 Test for k Proportions Example**

As personnel director, you want to test the perception of fairness of three methods of performance evaluation. Of 180 employees, 63 rated Method 1 as fair, 45 rated Method 2 as fair, 72 rated Method 3 as fair. At the .05 level of significance, is there a difference in perceptions? To check assumptions, use sample proportions as estimators of population proportion: n1·p = 78·63/78 = 63 n1·(1-p) = 78·(1-63/78) = 15 10

16
**2 Test for k Proportions Solution**

H0: Ha: = n1 = n2 = n3 = Critical Value(s): p1 = p2 = p3 = 1/3 At least 1 is different Test Statistic: Decision: Conclusion: .05 63 45 72 = .05 c 2 Reject H0 5.991 11

17
**2 Test for k Proportions Solution**

12

18
**2 Test for k Proportions Solution**

H0: Ha: = n1 = n2 = n3 = Critical Value(s): p1 = p2 = p3 = 1/3 At least 1 is different Test Statistic: Decision: Conclusion: 2 = 6.3 .05 63 45 72 c 2 Reject H0 Reject at = .05 5.991 = .05 There is evidence of a difference in proportions 11

19
**Contingency Tables Contingency Tables**

Useful in situations involving multiple population proportions Used to classify sample observations according to two or more characteristics Also called a cross-classification table.

20
**Contingency Table Example**

Left-Handed vs. Gender Dominant Hand: Left vs. Right Gender: Male vs. Female 2 categories for each variable, so called a 2 x 2 table Suppose we examine a sample of 300 children

21
**Contingency Table Example**

(continued) Sample results organized in a contingency table: Gender Hand Preference Left Right Female 12 108 120 Male 24 156 180 36 264 300 sample size = n = 300: 120 Females, 12 were left handed 180 Males, 24 were left handed

22
**2 Test for the Difference Between Two Proportions**

H0: π1 = π2 (Proportion of females who are left handed is equal to the proportion of males who are left handed) H1: π1 ≠ π2 (The two proportions are not the same hand preference is not independent of gender) If H0 is true, then the proportion of left-handed females should be the same as the proportion of left-handed males The two proportions above should be the same as the proportion of left-handed people overall

23
**The Chi-Square Test Statistic**

The Chi-square test statistic is: where: fo = observed frequency in a particular cell fe = expected frequency in a particular cell if H0 is true (Assumed: each cell in the contingency table has expected frequency of at least 5)

24
Decision Rule The test statistic approximately follows a chi-squared distribution with one degree of freedom Decision Rule: If , reject H0, otherwise, do not reject H0 2 Do not reject H0 Reject H0 2α

25
**Computing the Average Proportion**

The average proportion is: Here: 120 Females, 12 were left handed 180 Males, 24 were left handed i.e., of all the children the proportion of left handers is 0.12, that is, 12%

26
**Finding Expected Frequencies**

To obtain the expected frequency for left handed females, multiply the average proportion left handed (p) by the total number of females To obtain the expected frequency for left handed males, multiply the average proportion left handed (p) by the total number of males If the two proportions are equal, then P(Left Handed | Female) = P(Left Handed | Male) = .12 i.e., we would expect (.12)(120) = 14.4 females to be left handed (.12)(180) = 21.6 males to be left handed

27
**Observed vs. Expected Frequencies**

Gender Hand Preference Left Right Female Observed = 12 Expected = 14.4 Observed = 108 Expected = 105.6 120 Male Observed = 24 Expected = 21.6 Observed = 156 Expected = 158.4 180 36 264 300

28
**The Chi-Square Test Statistic**

Gender Hand Preference Left Right Female Observed = 12 Expected = 14.4 Observed = 108 Expected = 105.6 120 Male Observed = 24 Expected = 21.6 Observed = 156 Expected = 158.4 180 36 264 300 The test statistic is:

29
**Decision Rule 2 Decision Rule:**

If > 3.841, reject H0, otherwise, do not reject H0 Here, = < = 3.841, so we do not reject H0 and conclude that there is not sufficient evidence that the two proportions are different at = 0.05 0.05 2 Do not reject H0 Reject H0 20.05 = 3.841

30
**2 Test for Differences Among More Than Two Proportions**

Extend the 2 test to the case with more than two independent populations: H0: π1 = π2 = … = πc H1: Not all of the πj are equal (j = 1, 2, …, c)

31
**The Chi-Square Test Statistic**

The Chi-square test statistic is: Where: fo = observed frequency in a particular cell of the 2 x c table fe = expected frequency in a particular cell if H0 is true (Assumed: each cell in the contingency table has expected frequency of at least 1)

32
**Computing the Overall Proportion**

The overall proportion is: Expected cell frequencies for the c categories are calculated as in the 2 x 2 case, and the decision rule is the same: Where is from the chi-squared distribution with c – 1 degrees of freedom Decision Rule: If , reject H0, otherwise, do not reject H0

33
**The Marascuilo Procedure**

Used when the null hypothesis of equal proportions is rejected Enables you to make comparisons between all pairs Start with the observed differences, pj – pj’, for all pairs (for j ≠ j’) . . . . . .then compare the absolute difference to a calculated critical range

34
2 Test of Independence

35
**Hypothesis Tests Qualitative Data**

Z Test c 2 Test Proportion Independence 1 pop. More than 2 pop. 5

36
2 Test of Independence Shows if a relationship exists between two qualitative variables One sample is drawn Does not show causality Uses two-way contingency table

37
**2 Test of Independence Contingency Table**

Shows number of observations from 1 sample jointly in 2 qualitative variables Levels of variable 2 Levels of variable 1 40

38
**Conditions Required for a Valid 2 Test: Independence**

Multinomial experiment has been conducted The sample size, n, is large: Eij is greater than or equal to 5 for every cell

39
**2 Test of Independence Hypotheses & Statistic**

H0: Variables are independent Ha: Variables are related (dependent) Test Statistic Observed count Expected count Degrees of Freedom: (r – 1)(c – 1) Rows Columns 41

40
**2 Test of Independence Expected Counts**

Statistical independence means joint probability equals product of marginal probabilities Compute marginal probabilities and multiply for joint probability Expected count is sample size times joint probability e = Column Tot al Sample Siz Row Total a f f a f

41
**Expected Count Example**

Marginal probability = Location Urban Rural House Style Obs. Obs. Total Split–Level Ranch Total 43

42
**Expected Count Example**

Marginal probability = Location Urban Rural House Style Obs. Obs. Total Split–Level Ranch Total Marginal probability = 43

43
**Expected Count Example**

Joint probability = Marginal probability = Location Urban Rural House Style Obs. Obs. Total Split–Level Ranch Total Expected count = 160· = 54.6 Marginal probability = 43

44
**Expected Count Calculation**

112· 54.6 House Location 112· 57.4 Urban Rural House Style Obs. Exp. Obs. Exp. Total Split - Level 63 49 112 Ranch 48· 23.4 15 33 48· 24.6 48 Total 78 78 82 82 160 43

45
**2 Test of Independence Example**

As a realtor you want to determine if house style and house location are related. At the .05 level of significance, is there evidence of a relationship? 44

46
**2 Test of Independence Solution**

H0: Ha: = df = Critical Value(s): No Relationship Relationship Test Statistic: Decision: Conclusion: .05 (2 - 1)(2 - 1) = 1 c 2 Reject H0 3.841 = .05 47

47
**2 Test of Independence Solution**

Eij 5 in all cells 112· 112· 48· 48· 45

48
**2 Test of Independence Solution**

12

49
**2 Test of Independence Solution**

H0: Ha: = df = Critical Value(s): No Relationship Relationship Test Statistic: Decision: Conclusion: 2 = 8.41 .05 (2 - 1)(2 - 1) = 1 c 2 Reject H0 Reject at = .05 3.841 = .05 There is evidence of a relationship 47

50
**2 Test of Independence Thinking Challenge**

You’re a marketing research analyst. You ask a random sample of 286 consumers if they purchase Diet Pepsi or Diet Coke. At the .05 level of significance, is there evidence of a relationship? Diet Pepsi Diet Coke No Yes Total No 84 32 116 Yes 48 122 170 Total 132 154 286 44

51
**2 Test of Independence Solution***

H0: Ha: = df = Critical Value(s): No Relationship Relationship Test Statistic: Decision: Conclusion: .05 (2 - 1)(2 - 1) = 1 c 2 Reject H0 3.841 = .05 47

52
**2 Test of Independence Solution***

Eij 5 in all cells 116· 154· 170· 170· 45

53
**2 Test of Independence Solution***

12

54
**2 Test of Independence Solution***

H0: Ha: = df = Critical Value(s): No Relationship Relationship Test Statistic: Decision: Conclusion: 2 = 54.29 .05 (2 - 1)(2 - 1) = 1 c 2 Reject H0 Reject at = .05 3.841 = .05 There is evidence of a relationship 47

55
**2 Test of Independence Thinking Challenge 2**

There is a statistically significant relationship between purchasing Diet Coke and Diet Pepsi. So what do you think the relationship is? Aren’t they competitors? Diet Pepsi Diet Coke No Yes Total No 84 32 116 Yes 48 122 170 Total 132 154 286 48

56
**You Re-Analyze the Data**

High Income Diet Pepsi Diet Coke No Yes Total No 4 30 34 Yes 40 2 42 There is a spurious relationship between purchasing Diet Coke & Diet Pepsi. Income is an intervening or control variable & is the true cause. The analysis here uses only descriptive statistics. For low income, consumers are price conscious. Either they can’t afford to buy either or they buy whatever is on sale. For high income, consumers buy depending on preference regardless of price. Total 44 32 76 Low Income Diet Pepsi Diet Coke No Yes Total No 80 2 82 Yes 8 120 128 Total 88 122 210 49

57
**Control or intervening variable (true cause)**

True Relationships* Diet Coke There is a spurious relationship between purchasing Diet Coke & Diet Pepsi. Income is an intervening or control variable & is the true cause. The analysis here uses only descriptive statistics. For low income, consumers are price conscious. Either they can’t afford to buy either or they buy whatever is on sale. For high income, consumers buy depending on preference regardless of price. Underlying causal relation Apparent relation Control or intervening variable (true cause) Diet Pepsi 50

58
**Numbers don’t think - People do!**

Moral of the Story* Numbers don’t think - People do! © T/Maker Co. 51

59
**Conclusion Explained 2 Test for Proportions**

Explained 2 Test of Independence Solved Hypothesis Testing Problems More Than Two Population Proportions Independence As a result of this class, you will be able to ...

Similar presentations

OK

Copyright © 2013, 2010 and 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter Inference on Categorical Data 12.

Copyright © 2013, 2010 and 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter Inference on Categorical Data 12.

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

To make this website work, we log user data and share it with processors. To use this website, you must agree to our Privacy Policy, including cookie policy.

Ads by Google