Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byTravon Burlison Modified over 3 years ago

1
Econometric Analysis of Panel Data Panel Data Analysis – Random Effects Assumptions GLS Estimator Panel-Robust Variance-Covariance Matrix ML Estimator – Hypothesis Testing Test for Random Effects Fixed Effects vs. Random Effects

2
Panel Data Analysis Random Effects Model – u i is random, independent of e it and x it. – Define it = u i + e it the error components.

3
Random Effects Model Assumptions – Strict Exogeneity X includes a constant term, otherwise E(u i |X)=u. – Homoschedasticity – Constant Auto-covariance (within panels)

4
Random Effects Model Assumptions – Cross Section Independence

5
Random Effects Model Extensions – Weak Exogeneity – Heteroscedasticity and Autocorrelation – Cross Section Correlation

6
Model Estimation: GLS Model Representation

7
Model Estimation: GLS GLS

8
Model Estimation: RE-OLS Partial Group Mean Deviations

9
Model Estimation: RE-OLS Model Assumptions OLS

10
Model Estimation: RE-OLS Need a consistent estimator of : – Estimate the fixed effects model to obtain – Estimate the pooled model to obtain – Based on the estimated large sample variances, it is safe to obtain

11
Model Estimation: RE-OLS Panel-Robust Variance-Covariance Matrix – Consistent statistical inference for general heteroscedasticity, time series and cross section correlation.

12
Model Estimation: ML Log-Likelihood Function

13
Model Estimation: ML ML Estimator

14
Hypothesis Testing Test for Var(u i ) = 0, that is – If T i =T for all i, the Lagrange-multiplier test statistic (Breusch-Pagan, 1980) is:

15
Hypothesis Testing – For unbalanced panels, the modified Breusch- Pagan LM test for random effects (Baltagi-Li, 1990) is: – Alternative one-side test:

16
Hypothesis Testing Fixed Effects vs. Random Effects EstimatorRandom Effects E(u i |X i ) = 0 Fixed Effects E(u i |X i ) =/= 0 GLS or RE-OLS (Random Effects) Consistent and Efficient Inconsistent LSDV or FE-OLS (Fixed Effects) Consistent Inefficient Consistent Possibly Efficient

17
Hypothesis Testing Fixed effects estimator is consistent under H 0 and H 1 ; Random effects estimator is efficient under H 0, but it is inconsistent under H 1. Hausman Test Statistic

18
Hypothesis Testing Alternative Hausman Test – Estimate the random effects model – F Test that = 0

19
Example: Investment Demand Grunfeld and Griliches [1960] – i = 10 firms: GM, CH, GE, WE, US, AF, DM, GY, UN, IBM; t = 20 years: 1935-1954 – I it = Gross investment – F it = Market value – C it = Value of the stock of plant and equipment

Similar presentations

OK

Lecture 29 Summary of previous lecture LPM LOGIT PROBIT ORDINAL LOGIT AND PROBIT TOBIT MULTINOMIAL LOGIT AN PROBIT DURATION.

Lecture 29 Summary of previous lecture LPM LOGIT PROBIT ORDINAL LOGIT AND PROBIT TOBIT MULTINOMIAL LOGIT AN PROBIT DURATION.

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on law against child marriages Download ppt on turbo generator power Ppt on community health and environment Ppt on content development tools Ppt on unity in diversity and organic farming Ppt on job rotation disadvantages Ppt on web server Ppt on endangered species tiger A ppt on refraction of light Ppt on steve jobs biography book