2Law of Property Real Property: immovable (i.e. land, trees, houses) Oldest part of common lawConcepts from common law developed in England from 12th to 16th centuriesRight guaranteed and protected by governmentReal Property: immovable (i.e. land, trees, houses)Personal Property (chattel): moveable (i.e. furniture and clothing)Contract law is used to make arrangements about the property use
3Real Property Land under - oil, minerals attached - buildings, trees Property - “legally protected expectation of being able to use a thing for one’s advantage.’’Owner has a “bundle of legal rights”.Governmental regulations may restrict property owner’s common-law land use rights(i.e. Endangered Species Act re: rare plants and animal protection)
4Ownership of Land Deeds Most common way to transfer ownership—warranty deeds most popularID original owner, describe land, ID new owner & state that ownership is transferred, possibly subject to certain conditionsTitlesComes from receipt of valid deed; is means by which owner has legal possession of the property“Formal right of ownership”–sell, use, give–control itTitles are recorded by state officials (usually county)When property is transferred, usual to obtain title insurance (depends on state)
5Forms of OwnershipFee Simple - indefinite time and right to dispose of itup in the air “to the skies”down to the core “to the center of the earth”these rights can be sold separatelysubsurface mineral rights (profits) often legally separatedin all other countries, mineral rights belong to governmentCan be inherited, transferred, sold in part or in whole
6Forms of Ownership Joint tenancy Each tenant has same interest in undivided possession of propertyRight of survivorship – if one tenant dies, ownership passes to other ownerJoint tenants can force an end to joint tenancy by transferring an interest into a tenancy in commonTenancy in CommonEach tenant (owner) has undivided interest in propertyIf one tenant dies, that interest passes to estate/heirsTenancy by the EntiretyAvailable only to married couples; available in ½ of the statesOne tenant cannot force an end to it except by divorcing the otherLife EstatesHave use of land for life of “tenant for life”- but can’t ruin it.
7Trusts Form of ownership through common law Separates legal and beneficial ownership of propertySettlor (grantor) places property into a trust (often through what is call a deed of trust).Trustee owns legal title.Beneficiary holds an equitable title to the property.Trustee has a duty to manage the property for benefit of the beneficiaryBusiness Trusts often used in place of partnerships or corporationsBeneficiaries receive certificates of beneficial ownershipCan be traded like stocks & bonds
8Evolving Property Law: Condominiums Not seen much before 1960sFee simple estate appliesLiving space in building is owned in fee simple (numerous conditions attached)BUT land building sits on, as well as elevators & lobbies, are held in common (for condo owners) by another person (business)Most states have statutes to simplify the legal process of modern living arrangements consistent with traditional property law.
9Servitudes Servitudes property requirements imposed by an owner positive and negative requirementseasements and covenants most important servitudesEasementsright to enter land of another and make use of it or take somethingexample: sidewalks, utilitiesbecoming common in connection with solar and wind energyNeighbors cannot block sunlight or solar collectors.Can’t block wind from turbines.
10Adverse Possession Must be: Actual - does in fact possess property Open - visible so owner is on noticeHostile - without consent of ownerExclusive - not shared with others who have no rightContinuous - goes on without major interruptionState laws vary on time required – from 5-20 years
11Moran v. SimsSims owned property for decades surrounded by Moran property.Sims built a home in Had access to property by driveway across the property bought by Moran in 1996.Sims asked the court to grant him an easement.Trial court held that Sims has a prescriptive easement; allowed use of driveway on Moran’s property. Moran appealed.HELD: Affirmed. Elements of adverse possession proven.Use of the property wasOpen and visible: Sims used the driveway since 1985Hostile: No proof Moran consented for Sims to use driveClaim of Ownership: Sims bought gravel for drive & hired it spreadExclusive: Driveway used by Sims family & those they permitted to use itPeaceful: No evidence of dispute of use of drivewayContinuous/Uninterrupted for 10 years+
12Covenants Covenants or Covenant Running With the Land Not actual legal interest in an estateMore like a contract with an estateMost residential subdivisions have covenantsMay burden or benefit the landTool for developing real estateGoes with the estate from owner to owner“Covenant runs with the land”
13Powell v. Washburn1988, Washburn, real estate developer, recorded Declarations of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R) for Indian Hills Airpark, an aviation-related community.Referenced incorporation of the La Paz County zoning ordinancesZoning permitted 3 residential uses: mobile or manufactured homes, constructed homes, and hanger-houses (homes incorporating an airplane hanger).In 1996, County amended ordinances to permit use of recreational vehicles (RVs) as residences.In 2002 Powell sued Washburn requesting injunction against use of RVs as residences within the Airpark.Trial Court held CC&R did not permit RVs as residents.Appeals court reversed. Decision appealed to state supreme court.HELD: Vacated and affirmed the trial courtNo RV’s permitted as residencesLook at the intention of the parties that created a restrictive covenantThe plain intent of the CC&R’s was to limit residents to mobile or manufactured homes, constructed homes or hanger-homes.
14Landlords & Tenants Landlords and tenants rented property is called a leaseholdlandlord has interest of some lengthtenant possesses estate for a fixed period or at will as determined by landlordLeased property is assumed at law to have an implied warranty of habitability.
15Lease Can be commercial or residential ID parties describe premises being leasedstate how long in effectstate how much rent is to be paiddoes not have to state a specific endcan go month to monthusually also:who pays utilities, taxes, insurancewhere/when rent is paidterms of damage depositwho is responsible for repairs/maintenancesubleasingtermination provision
16Rights/Duties of a Tenant Right of possession during leaseCan exclude other partiesLandlord must make essential repairs or may have constructive evictionCan’t:abuse propertycommit wasteremove valuable propertybe nuisance to neighborsengage in illegal activities on property
17Commercial LeasesCommercial leases often drafted by the lessor’s legal departmentBased on state law requirements and experiences with previous tenantsTend to be longCover many issues in detailDescription of leased space is often defined by terms used by the Building Owners and Mangers Association (BOMA)Recognized authority in setting standards for commercial leases
18Nielson v. Gold’s GymPeterson signed lease with Nielsen to lease “premises” in a strip mall for a gym for 3 years at $0.85 annual per square foot.Nielsen still building at the time of the lease.Contractor told Peterson it would cost $168,000 to improve the building shell for the gym.Peterson discussed with Nielsen who would pay for the interior improvements.Couldn’t reach agreement. Peterson walked away. Nielsen leased to another party.Nielsen sued for $112,000 for breach of contract & loss for renting space for less than Peterson had agreed to.Court held lease was unenforceable: no agreement of the nature and extent of property to be leased. Appeal.
19Nielson v. Gold’s GymHELD: Affirmed. Lease unenforceable for lack of mutual assent to terms of who will pay for the improvement.Building was a shell when lease was signed.Not clear from the lease who would pay for modifications.No evidence of industry standards of who would be responsible for payment in this situation.Costs of improvements would have consumed more than half the rent over the 3-year lease term.Payment for improvements is not essential to every commercial lease agreement.HOWEVER, here it was an essential part of the bargain to be reached.Missing term creates an ambiguous lease and no mutual assent by the parties.
20Public Control of Real Property Eminent DomainGovernment can force sale of property or granting of easement without consent of ownerMust prove need for a public purpose5th Amendment requires “just compensation”Police powersControl land use with regulations (i.e. zoning)Is there compensation? Maybe, but when property loses value, compensation may not appear to be “just” to an owner.Sometimes negotiated & sometimes statutes help court or jury decides amount to be paid
21Saadala v. East Brunswick Zoning Board of Adjustment 7-Eleven has a store with 6 parking spaces on ½ acre lot in NJPart of lot is zoned residential, but store existed before zoningStore was “grandfathered in” as a preexisting nonconforming useNext to 7-Eleven is vacant Shell gas station also “grandfathered in”7-Eleven wanted to take over the gas station property and build retail gas operationRequested preexisting nonconforming use be extendedSaadala, area resident, opposed classificationZoning Board approved it anywayDecision affirmed by County Trial CourtSaadala appealed
22Saadala v. East Brunswick Zoning Board of Adjustment HELD: Judgment reversed. 7-Eleven loses.Court looked at N.J. statute re: repair and restoration of structure existing at time of passage of new ordinancePurpose of limited nonconforming uses is to prevent any increase or change in nonconformityUnder 7-Eleven’s redevelopment plan, new business operation would involve construction of 3 new islands to dispense gas and a kiosk, as well as 11 new parking spacesThis is not simply an expansion of the convenience store or former Shell gas station; it is a substantial change in use of the properties7-Eleven failed to show the property “peculiarly fitted” for a mini-martFailed to show “special reasons” for approval of a use variance for its redevelopment plan; proposal rejected
23Torts Against Property Trespass to Land: Unauthorized intrusion that interferes with another’s peaceful enjoyment of their propertyBelief by trespasser that property belongs to him/her is not relevant -- still a trespassProperty owner may not intentionally harm trespasser or set a trap – but usually no duty to warn of dangerous conditions on the propertyPrivate Nuisance: interference with use & enjoyment of landDestruction of crops, causing health risks from pollution, throwing objects on the land, using the neighboring house for drug dealsPublic Nuisance: Interference with a right held in common by general publicIllegal gambling, bad odors, obstruction of a highwayTrespass to Personal Property: Interference with the right of an owner to the exclusive use and enjoyment of propertyConversion: Unlawful control of another’s personal propertyMisappropriation: Invasion of property rights such as trademarks or trade secrets
24Smith v. Kulig Kulig owns building with apartments on second floor. Back of building is a fire escape.Tenants are not to use fire escape unless an emergency.Smith visited Wolf at his apartment in the building.Smith went on fire escape; collapsed; Smith fell to his death.Estate sued Kulig.Trial court dismissed, holding Smith was a trespasser. Appealed.Held: Affirmed. Wrongful death action dismissed with prejudice.Trespasser is person who enters premises without privilege/consent.Building contained no trespass signs, as did door leading to and from fire escape.Ladder to the fire escape had no trespassing sign.Smith did not have the right to use fire escape–no emergency.Landowner owes no duty to trespasser other than not harming him in wanton or willful manner.
25Atkinson v. City of Pierre Tour Ice produced ice at its plant in business district of Pierre for years. Trucks come and go..Atkinson moved into apartment across street from ice plant. Complained to Tour Ice and City about noise– got nowhere.Sued for nuisance.Trial Court held for defendants. Atkinson appealed.HELD: Affirmed. Business is not a nuisance.There were no other complaints from any other residents near the plant.City has authority to declare what constitutes a nuisance.City’s decision was reasonable.
26Torts Against Property Owners Is a person harmed on the property a trespasser or an invitee?Customers are invitees, not trespassers.What duty of care must property owners take to insure safety on their property?In business, a major tort is “premises liability.”
27Premises LiabilityAccidents that result from negligence of the businessCommon are “slip-and-fall” casesDuty to keep premises reasonably safe under the circumstancesDuty to inspect premises for dangers and correct problem or warn inviteesIf a danger is obvious, people have duty to protect themselves by acting reasonably.See Campisi v. Acme Markets, Inc.
28Campisi v. Acme Markets, Inc. Blind employee worked at Acme grocery store. Was walking, using his white aluminum cane.Campisi walking down another aisle; rounded the corner; tripped over cane; suffered injuries.She sued Acme for premises liability based on negligence: store should post a sign that it had a blind employee using cane, then customers would be more cautious.Jury awarded a verdict for Campisi. Trial Court granted Acme judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Campisi appealed.HELD: Affirmed. Verdict in favor of Acme.Businesses owe invitees high duty of care for known or reasonably foreseeable risks or dangers.Customers must be aware of sudden occurrences in shopping markets – shopping carts, other customer’s foot, someone’s cane, or obstacles when exiting an aisle.Duty of ordinary care includes looking what is in the aisles. No award to Campisi.
29Premises LiabilityAccidents that result from negligence of the businessCommon are “slip-and-fall” casesNot providing sufficient security to prevent crimes from occurring on the propertyProblems are especially in high crime areasIssue: Owner “knew or should of known” of problem in the areaIssue: Did owner act “reasonably” to protect patrons?Ways owners may protect themselves: lighting, safety patrols, posters, warnings
30Erichsen v. No-Frills Supermarkets of Omaha Erichsen went grocery shopping at No-Frills.Returned to her car, assaulted, beaten, robbed, dragged a mile hanging from the car of assailant. Suffered serious injuries.Sued No-Frills and owner of shopping center for negligently failing to warn of criminal activity.Said defendants failed to protect her from foreseeable criminal activities (10 criminal events within 16-month period).Trial court held defendants did not violate duty of care to Erichsen.She appealed.HELD: Remanded back to trial court for further proceedings.Property owner is not an insurer of safety until he knows that acts of 3rd persons are occurring or could occur.If owner has “reason to know, from past experience” that there is danger, he has a duty to take precautions: warnings or guards.One incident not enough to create danger.However, here there were many prior criminal events in the area.Erichsen can go to trial with facts of the case against defendants.