We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRuben Paradise
Modified over 2 years ago
© Marilyn Bush & Associates 6 April Making Process Improvement Harder: CMMI* Traps to Avoid Marilyn Bush Telephone and Fax In UK: (0) In US: ieee.org *SM CMMI is a service mark of Carnegie Mellon University C *
© Marilyn Bush & Associates 6 April Time-Honored Mistakes Mistake 1: Assuming assessments are externally imposed tests that can be gamed. (Assessments are in fact paths to radical self-examination that depends on complete openness.) Mistake 2: Not encouraging Senior Managers to play a central role in process improvement. Mistake 3: Not encouraging Project Managers to take real responsibility for process improvement on their project. Mistake 4: Appointing a process improvement manager without real authority to implement post-assessment improvement activities. Mistake 5: Appointing a few people or hiring a consultant or buying a tool to create procedures and make everything better.
© Marilyn Bush & Associates 6 April Mistake 1: Assessments Seen As Tests Organizations are afraid that they will not make the grade or be certified and therefore they try to game an assessment by Preparing people in the organization for interviews Writing procedures or buying procedures to be used in the assessment that no one has ever used
© Marilyn Bush & Associates 6 April Assessments Work Because They Are Self-Examinations Assessments mirror the organization by getting people to explain what they do in public. Assessments assemble evidence that people are unaware of. Assessments present a way for the whole organization (from senior managers to new hires) to see itself free of a culture of blame. None of this works if organizations approach assessments as efforts to obtain (by fair means or foul) a good grade.
© Marilyn Bush & Associates 6 April Mistake 2: Failing to Assign Senior Management a Key Role in Process Improvement Senior Managers are the only people in the organization that have the real authority to ensure that the organization emphasizes the changes it desires to see on projects. Assessments put senior management at the centre of the improvement effort. They are made to function as the sponsors of the assessment and only they can drive the post-assessment effort.
© Marilyn Bush & Associates 6 April Senior Managers Must Lead If all your senior management does is sponsor the effort, its probably doomed anyway! I believe that senior management must lead the charge by exhibiting the same process disciplined behavior that they expect the troops to adopt.. Unless management is willing to align their own behavior with the direction they are trying to establish, it is simply another case of do what I say, not what I do. The commitment of senior management to establish a process-disciplined organization is reflected much more clearly by their own behavior than it is in a policy statement lifted from the pages of the CMMI. source: OToole 2003
© Marilyn Bush & Associates 6 April Senior Managers Have to Learn to Ask the Right Questions An organization will not change if senior management continues to ask only about profit and schedule. The message this sends to middle managers is Do what ever you have to do to meet the schedules. Quality isnt important.
© Marilyn Bush & Associates 6 April How to Extend the Authority of Senior Management Without Diluting It: A Viable Management Structure An Executive Board Role is to review and approve potential improvements in any area of the organization Overall Process Steering Group Role is to manage, coordinate and review activities across the organization Individual Department Process Groups Such as Engineering Process Group, Software Engineering Process Groups, Human Resources Process Groups Role is to coordinate the individual departments improvement activities. The managers of the appropriate department should be included
© Marilyn Bush & Associates 6 April Asking the Wrong Questions at Executive Project Reviews Whose fault is it that the projects behind schedule? Who do I chew out/demote/fire to fix these problems? Given the state of the project, why didnt I see many cars here on Saturday?
© Marilyn Bush & Associates 6 April The Kinds of Questions That Senior Management Should Ask Are Things Like: How many defects are we finding? Before Test? During Test? In operations? How could the process be changed to avoid these problems in the future? How can issues like this be identified when theyre still just risks, and subsequently mitigated? How do we communicate the painful lessons identified on this project to benefit others? Bottom line: senior management change behaviours when they insist on getting the answers. -- Pat OToole
© Marilyn Bush & Associates 6 April Mistake 3: Not Encouraging Project Managers to Take Real Responsibility for Process Improvement on Their Project For the CMMI to work Project Managers must make themselves personally responsible for consolidating and monitoring the improvement of project-level processes. Project managers, according to the CMMI, are alone responsible for satisfying the customer (p.625). They are therefore personally responsible for quality and improvement. At CMMI Level 2, Project Managers have primary authority for ensuring that processes are understood and followed. Although the CMMI sometimes seems to treat the process monitoring and correction as engineering responsibilities, the global logic of the CMMI depends on the Project Managers hands- on supervision.
© Marilyn Bush & Associates 6 April Mistake 4: Appointing a Process Improvement Manager Without Real Authority to Implement Post-assessment Improvement Activities Process Improvement Managers have access neither to the information nor the authority to structure discipline into planning and management. They function merely as advisers to Project and Senior Managers, who alone see the big picture and have the power to change it.
© Marilyn Bush & Associates 6 April Mistake 5: Appointing a Few People or Hiring a Consultant or Buying a Tool to Create Procedures and Make Everything Better. Companies assume that a few consultants or a few members of the Quality Assurance group can write procedures for the whole organization. But having pretty unused procedures doesnt work. In a Level-1 Organization, Process Groups are useful but only up to a point Help project managers and staff articulate their current procedures Help organize working groups across projects when requested by the project personnel Process Groups cannot be expected to develop organization -wide processes. The organization as a whole must first agree on which individual best practices all the projects should use. This happens as an organization approaches Level 3. At Levels One and Two, Projects barely understand which processes work for them and which need improving.
© Marilyn Bush & Associates 6 April When Process Improvement Works: A Company-Wide Team Effort Senior Managers authorize process improvement and hold Project Managers to their responsibilities. They must know enough to ask Project Managers for regular measured and analytic reviews of quality and improvement, not just about cost and schedule. Developers (Systems engineering, software engineering, hardware engineering) are responsible for developing and monitoring specific processes related to their work. Project Managers, as part of being responsible for getting a quality product out on budget and on schedule, have personal responsibility for the the processes that ensure that the organization has the capability to do this. Process Improvement Managers have insufficient authority to make real changes and are not positioned to see the project as a whole.
SE 450 Software Processes & Product Metrics 1 Quality Systems Frameworks.
Managing CMMI ® as a Project Intelligence and Information Systems (IIS), Garland, Texas Richard Marks November 20, 2003 CMMI is registered in the U.S.
Effort Reporting: A Departmental Approach to Meeting Audit Requirements Dianne Valdez, MBA, CIA, CISA, CCSA Enrique Valdez Jr., MBA.
Agenda for Discussion Agenda for Discussion Risk Management Stakeholder Analysis project solutions for your world Gina Davidovic, PMP
Swami NatarajanJune 13, 2015 RIT Software Engineering Quality Systems Frameworks.
Conservation Districts Supervisor Accreditation Module 9: Employer/Employee Relations.
1. Risk The chance of something happening that will have an impact on objectives. A risk is often specified in terms of an event or circumstance and the.
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 27 Slide 1 Quality Management.
Change Management Chris Colomb Trish Fullmer Jordan Bloodworth Veronica Beichner.
Learning and Development CHAPTER 17 Developing leaders and managers.
1 Lecture 18 Quality Assurance CS 4310: Software Engineering.
Training Guide Gaining Senior Leadership Support for Continuity of Operations.
Business Ethics: Ethics can be defined as standards or principles of conduct that govern the behavior of an individual or a group of individuals. Ethics.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Statistical Project Monitoring Section B 1.
ICE Evaluations Some Suggestions for Improvement.
Project Management Project Roles. The number of people involved in a project and the roles they play will vary greatly between different types and size.
Should You Establish a Project Management Office (PMO)?
Internal Control Integrated Framework An Overview.. Prepared by Wael F. Bibi,JCPA,CPA,CIA Bibi Consulting,Inc. COSOs Source: COSOs.
UKSMA 2005 Lessons Learnt from introducing IT Measurement Peter Thomas –
Chapter 24 - Quality Management Chapter 24 Quality management1.
1 Dr. Ashraf El-Farghly SECC. 2 Level 3 focus on the organization - Best practices are gathered across the organization. - Processes are tailored depending.
Corvelle Drives Concepts to Completion It's 10 a.m.! Do you know where your IT projects are? Project World Vancouver, B. C. 26 October
Overall Quality Assurance, Selecting and managing external consultants and outsourcing Baku Training Module.
Applied Software Project Management Andrew Stellman & Jennifer Greene Applied Software Project Management Applied Software.
0 April 24, 2006 DELIVERABLE APPENDIX Program Management Office (PMO) This document is confidential and is intended solely for the use and information.
Effective Questioning in the classroom. The purpose of Questioning to interest, engage and challenge pupils; to check on prior knowledge and understanding;
Encouraging Lasting Change With Your Successfully Completed Complex Project “A Division of TOTAL QUALITY CONTROL”
Managing a functional exercise for the first time Graham Leonard, Business Continuity Manager Insights and lessons 17 June 2014.
Nature of Management Goal Oriented : It coordinates the efforts of workers to achieve the goals of the organisation. The success of management is measured.
Degree and Grad uation Seminar Integration Management.
Business and Marketing 2 nd Semester Unit 4: Skills for Business and Marketing.
Introduction Managing time in organizations is difficult because time flows at the same rate for everyone and cannot be 'managed' like other resources.
Towards More Effective Board Functioning Fall Lausanne Confidential to CEO-CF and CEO-CF members.
Using qualitative data Look for patterns Example 1. How do new teachers feel about their preparation for entering the classroom? I felt prepared as far.
Pittsburgh, PA CMMI Acquisition Module - Page M5-1 CMMI ® Sponsored by the U.S. Department of Defense © 2005 by Carnegie Mellon University This.
Software Project Management Team Assignment #3 K15T2_Team 5.
©Ian Sommerville 2000 Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 24Slide 1 Chapter 24 Quality Management.
Schermerhorn - Chapter 71 Chapter 7 Controlling - To Ensure Results 4 Planning Ahead –How do controls work in organizations? Plan metrics and measurements.
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
1 THE CERTIFYING AUTHORITY How the Certifying Authority can deliver assurance? How the Certifying Authority can deliver assurance? Adérito Pinto European.
By Saurabh Sardesai October 2014.
Develop an Information Strategy Plan. Aim This presentation is prepared to support and give a general overview of the ‘How to Develop an Information Strategy.
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING.
0 May 2013 Internal Control–Integrated Framework.
Copyright Princeton University This work is the intellectual property of Princeton University. Permission is granted for this material to be shared.
Leadership in Management Chapter 8 Introduction to Business.
This material is approved for public release. Distribution is limited by the Software Engineering Institute to attendees. Sponsored by the U.S. Department.
FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENCES IN MANAGERIAL JOB BEHAVIOUR: There are different types of manager according to their functions. They are 1)Functional Managers:
1 Controlling as a Management Function l Controlling A process of monitoring performance and taking action to ensure desired results. It sees to it.
© 2016 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.