Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byKarly Seader Modified over 2 years ago

1

2
Importing Model to Ecotect Anaysis.

3
.3ds geometry--Ecotect

4

5
Conclusion: Analysis will retard or take long time.

6
Revit and Ecotect Tag the object carefully in Revit for gbxml filetype!

7
Revit model tagged as shaded part and untagged as un-shaded part. To import gbxml format from revit for analysis, whole part should be completely tagged

8
Conclusion: Analysis will work but cylindrical geometry will be a mess as ecotect converts it into triangular components.

9
Cylinder computed by Ecotect becomes more complex triangular geometry Avoid Complex Geometry as far as possible.

10
Carefully deleted the outer cylindrical from imported xml file and created cylinder surface on ecotect so that analysis is done smoothly. More Simplified geometry for Ecotect Model

11
Acoustical Analysis

12
Set Sound Source and Reflectors (ceilings)

13
Generate Rays

14
Reflector position and orientation calculation Acoustical Analysis

15
Trial 1 Default

16
Trial 1 12m dia=30m

17
Trial 1 Default 12m dia=30m

18
Trial 1 Default 12m dia=30m

19
Trial 1 Default dia=30m 12m

20
Conclusion of Trial 1 More REVEB sound was detected. Hence need to modify -Geometry -Orientation (incident angle etc.) Material quality is kept as default. Hence parameters to control in the analysis are Reflectors (ceilings) property.

21
Trial 2 Lowering ceiling Decreased by 3m 9m dia=30m

22
Trial 2 Lowering ceiling Decreased by 3m 9m dia=30m

23
Decreased by 3m Trial 2 Lowering ceiling 9m dia=30m

24
Trial 3 Increased by 3m 15m dia=30m

25
Trial 3 15m dia=30m

26
Conclusion of Trials 2 and 3 As we change the heights of the ceiling, just above the stage, quality changes drastically As we lower more noise is observed As we higher the ceiling good quality is observed for same directed ray generated.

27
Material assignment to the Reflectors at height of 12m Acoustical Analysis

28
Assigning all reflectors as Acoustical Tile.

29
Table to feed different NRC Values

30
Feeding different Absorptive value for different frequency.

31
Adding Material-NRC.03 dia=30m 12m

32
Adding Material-NRC.03 12m dia=30m

33
Adding Material-NRC.61 dia=30m 12m

34
Adding Material-NRC.85 dia=30m 12m

35
Conclusion of different NRC Values For Higher Noise Reduction Coefficients (NRC 0.6 and above) most of the sound waves are observed that leads to Dryness of Sound which seems to be bad of an amphitheatre. For lower NRC(0.3) we have variety of sound variation which is not desired Hence selected NRC 0.56 which is 12 mm Mineral Fiber Material which is also fire resistant.

36
Adding Material-NRC.56 12m dia=30m

37
Adding Material-NRC.56 12m dia=30m

38
Results or Output from Ecotect Analysis. Acoustical Analysis

39
Acoustical Response

40
Sound Decay for different frequency

41
Reverberation Graph TOTAL SABINE NOR-ER MIL-SE FREQ. ABSPT. RT(60) RT(60) RT(60) Hz: Hz: Hz: Hz: kHz: kHz: kHz: kHz: kHz:

42
STATISTICAL ACOUSTICS - 18 Room Volume: m3 Surface Area: m2 Occupancy: 680 (850 x 80%) Optimum RT (500Hz - Speech): 0.99 s Optimum RT (500Hz - Music): 1.65 s Volume per Seat: m3 Minimum (Speech): m3 Minimum (Music): m3 Most Suitable: Norris-Eyring (Highly absorbant) Selected: Sabine (Uniformly distributed)

Similar presentations

© 2016 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google