Presentation on theme: "Footwear Identification"— Presentation transcript:
1Footwear Identification Class CharacteristicsIrregularities
2Footwear Examination To conduct a footwear examination: The examiner must be able to detect class and random or unique characteristics of the questioned footwear impression.Equipment: Accurate ruler, magnifier, bright torch, high resolution photographs
3Characteristics created from the manufacturing process Footwear ExaminationClass characteristics are characteristics that are common to a group such as shape, style, size and model.Characteristics created from the manufacturing process
4Footwear ExaminationRandom or unique or identifying characteristics are characteristics that happen by chance such as cuts in the sole or rocks imbedded in the tread of the shoe.
10Intelligence Brand Model(s) Season of introduction Anything else, e.g. from USlarge sizes onlyspecial rangeAll coded to assist search procedure in SICAR
11Link together crimes in specific areas A common shoe in one area may not be as common in another
12Value of footwear - Evidence Class Characteristics – Mould features Footwear manufacturer, model and size: Examination of footwear impression for "Class Characteristics" such as general outsole patterns and shapes, footwear design features and feature markings can help examiners identify the manufacturer , model and size of the footwear. This Information can be used to help profile the suspect and provide leads on who may have bought or worn the footwear which created the impression.1. Patterns – Do the patterns match?2. Moulds – Different moulds can be used for the same pattern – Are these the same are they any specific differences or points of identification?3. Size – Is the size the same – are there any differences which can be explained?
17Value of footwear Evidence – Wearer information Approximate height and wearer: Measurements of footwear impression dimensions can be used to provide the approximate height of a suspect. With shoeprint size information, investigators can refer to statistical data to approximate the height of the person since shoeprint vs. height relationship follows a normal distribution. Height can also be approximate by stride length which could be measured from a set of footwear impressions.Sometimes a footwear size can be unusual which reduces the number of people wearing that specific shoe.
19Unique Irregularities Size 7mm + with + 6 components – High evidential valueSize 3mm + with 2+ components – Average evidential valueHigh Value – 2 Dimensions on a castLow value on a gelatine lift
20Value of the Irregularity 12345678HighValue H1: -+7mm - 6 partsValue H2: + 5mm - 4 partsMiddleValue M1: +3mm/line 8mm – 2 partsValue M2: +3mm line under 7mm – 1 partLowValue L1: line or ellipse 1.5 – 3mm – 1 partValue L2: Round imperfection, less than 1.5mm round imperfectionSimilarity between Damage and IrregularityCorrespondsCorresponds – roughly or partially
21Result of Shoe examination depending on the similarity of the irregularity in the shoe and the crime scene printH1 = value of 6 – 9H2 = value of 3 – 6M1 = value ofM2 = value of 0.8 to1.6L1 = Value of 0.6 – 1.2L2 = Value of 0.4 to 0.8Add in wear similarity and walking patternIdentification = 8 or aboveVery Probable = 5.5 or aboveProbable = 3.0 or abovePossible = 1.0 or above
24Schallamach - Macro lens In 1971, Schallamach discovered that friction of soft, elastomeric interfaces is often dominated by the onset and propagation of elastic instabilities in the form of surface waves.The arrows in the lower right-hand corners depict the ridge spacing of the Schallamach pattern in the questioned footwear impression and the corresponding ridge spacing on the outsole of the known shoe.
25SchallamachThe Schallamach pattern is a ridge-like design, similar to a fingerprint, that appears on the flat part of the shoe outsole. This pattern changes within 48 to 50 hours of continuous wear (Tart et al. 1996). Davis and Keeley (1997) conducted additional research and concluded the following regarding the Schallamach pattern:Of the 258 footwear identifications made by the Metropolitan Police Forensic Science Laboratory from 1991 to 1994, 28 involved the Schallamach pattern.The Schallamach pattern was observed mainly in the toe and heel area of the outsole, ran horizontally across the outsole of the shoe, and was not affected by the design of the outsole.The ridge spacing of the Schallamach pattern varied from 0.05 to 0.5 mm.Schallamach patterns were observed on two of the outsoles after less than 9 hours of wear.The Schallamach patterns started to change completely after 6 hours of wear on one outsole and 16 hours on another outsole.The Schallamach patterns observed from shoe to shoe were distinct. (Davis and Keeley 1997)
27Test printsTest print must replicate exactly how the crime scene mark was recovered2 dimensional – place a foot (of around the same size) into the shoe. Lightly spray the shoe with WD40 and walk across a piece of paper. Powder as required3 dimensional – take a cast of the shoe using Bio-Foam – or compare directly against the shoe with a crime scene cast.
28Photograph a footwear cast Do not over clean the cast – this can remove evidential characteristicsLight evenly on each side – side lightingIf required photograph the irregularities individually
29Black Gelatine lift – Gel lifters All black gel lifts produce a mirror image – reverse before you do the comparisonInvert the image to provide a white background with clearly visible footwear irregularities.Detail this information in the footwear case report and the court statement.
30Footwear examination report 1:1 photograph of the shoe Footwear case reportCourt StatementFootwear examination report1:1 photograph of the shoe1:1 photograph of the crime scene mark1:1 copy of the test print from the suspect shoeOverlay on the crime scene shoe high lighting the ‘Irregularities’Overlay of the crime scene mark high lighting the irregularities
31Information about the examination required The Crime Scene Mark Court StatementInformation about the examination requiredThe Crime Scene MarkThe suspect shoesThe interpretationAppendix