Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1
**Data Mining and Machine Learning with EM**

2
**Data Mining and Machine Learning are Ubiquitous!**

Netflix Amazon Wal-Mart Algorithmic Trading/High Frequency Trading Banks (Segmint) Google/Yahoo/Microsoft/IBM CRM/Consumer Behavior Profiling Consumer Review Mobile Ads Social Network (Facebook/Twitter/Google+) Voting Behaviors …

3
Data Mining Non-trivial extraction of implicit, previously unknown and potentially useful information from data Exploration & analysis, by automatic or semi-automatic means, of large quantities of data in order to discover meaningful patterns

4
**Data Mining Tasks Prediction Methods Description Methods**

Use some variables to predict unknown or future values of other variables. Description Methods Find human-interpretable patterns that describe the data. From [Fayyad, et.al.] Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1996

5
**Data Mining Tasks... Classification [Predictive]**

Clustering [Descriptive] Association Rule Discovery [Descriptive] Sequential Pattern Discovery [Descriptive] Regression [Predictive] Deviation Detection [Predictive]

7
**Association Rule Discovery: Definition**

Given a set of records each of which contain some number of items from a given collection; Produce dependency rules which will predict occurrence of an item based on occurrences of other items. Rules Discovered: {Milk} --> {Coke} {Diaper, Milk} --> {Beer}

8
**Association Rule Discovery: Application 1**

Marketing and Sales Promotion: Let the rule discovered be {Bagels, … } --> {Potato Chips} Potato Chips as consequent => Can be used to determine what should be done to boost its sales. Bagels in the antecedent => Can be used to see which products would be affected if the store discontinues selling bagels. Bagels in antecedent and Potato chips in consequent => Can be used to see what products should be sold with Bagels to promote sale of Potato chips!

9
**Definition: Frequent Itemset**

A collection of one or more items Example: {Milk, Bread, Diaper} k-itemset An itemset that contains k items Support count () Frequency of occurrence of an itemset E.g. ({Milk, Bread,Diaper}) = 2 Support Fraction of transactions that contain an itemset E.g. s({Milk, Bread, Diaper}) = 2/5 Frequent Itemset An itemset whose support is greater than or equal to a minsup threshold

10
**Frequent Itemsets Mining**

TID Transactions 100 { A, B, E } 200 { B, D } 300 400 { A, C } 500 { B, C } 600 700 { A, B } 800 { A, B, C, E } 900 { A, B, C } 1000 { A, C, E } Minimum support level 50% {A},{B},{C},{A,B}, {A,C}

11
**Frequent Itemset Generation**

Given d items, there are 2d possible candidate itemsets

12
**Frequent Itemset Generation**

Brute-force approach: Each itemset in the lattice is a candidate frequent itemset Count the support of each candidate by scanning the database Match each transaction against every candidate Complexity ~ O(NMw) => Expensive since M = 2d !!!

13
**Reducing Number of Candidates**

Apriori principle: If an itemset is frequent, then all of its subsets must also be frequent Apriori principle holds due to the following property of the support measure: Support of an itemset never exceeds the support of its subsets This is known as the anti-monotone property of support

14
**Illustrating Apriori Principle**

Found to be Infrequent Pruned supersets

16
Apriori R. Agrawal and R. Srikant. Fast algorithms for mining association rules. VLDB, , 1994

19
**What is Cluster Analysis?**

Finding groups of objects such that the objects in a group will be similar (or related) to one another and different from (or unrelated to) the objects in other groups Inter-cluster distances are maximized Intra-cluster distances are minimized

20
**Applications of Cluster Analysis**

Understanding Group related documents for browsing, group genes and proteins that have similar functionality, or group stocks with similar price fluctuations Summarization Reduce the size of large data sets Clustering precipitation in Australia

21
**Notion of a Cluster can be Ambiguous**

How many clusters? Six Clusters Two Clusters Four Clusters

22
**Types of Clusterings A clustering is a set of clusters**

Important distinction between hierarchical and partitional sets of clusters Partitional Clustering A division data objects into non-overlapping subsets (clusters) such that each data object is in exactly one subset Hierarchical clustering A set of nested clusters organized as a hierarchical tree

23
**Partitional Clustering**

A Partitional Clustering Original Points

24
**Hierarchical Clustering**

Traditional Hierarchical Clustering Traditional Dendrogram Non-traditional Hierarchical Clustering Non-traditional Dendrogram

25
**K-means Clustering Partitional clustering approach**

Each cluster is associated with a centroid (center point) Each point is assigned to the cluster with the closest centroid Number of clusters, K, must be specified The basic algorithm is very simple

26
**K-means Clustering – Details**

Initial centroids are often chosen randomly. Clusters produced vary from one run to another. The centroid is (typically) the mean of the points in the cluster. ‘Closeness’ is measured by Euclidean distance, cosine similarity, correlation, etc.

29
**K-means Clustering – Details**

K-means will converge for common similarity measures mentioned above. Most of the convergence happens in the first few iterations. Often the stopping condition is changed to ‘Until relatively few points change clusters’ Complexity is O( n * K * I * d ) n = number of points, K = number of clusters, I = number of iterations, d = number of attributes

31
K-Means Clustering

32
**How to MapReduce K-Means?**

Given K, assign the first K random points to be the initial cluster centers Assign subsequent points to the closest cluster using the supplied distance measure Compute the centroid of each cluster and iterate the previous step until the cluster centers converge within delta Run a final pass over the points to cluster them for output

33
**K-Means Map/Reduce Design**

Driver Runs multiple iteration jobs using mapper+combiner+reducer Runs final clustering job using only mapper Mapper Configure: Single file containing encoded Clusters Input: File split containing encoded Vectors Output: Vectors keyed by nearest cluster Combiner Input: Vectors keyed by nearest cluster Output: Cluster centroid vectors keyed by “cluster” Reducer (singleton) Input: Cluster centroid vectors Output: Single file containing Vectors keyed by cluster

34
**Mapper - mapper has k centers in memory.**

Input Key-value pair (each input data point x). Find the index of the closest of the k centers (call it iClosest). Emit: (key,value) = (iClosest, x) Reducer(s) – Input (key,value) Key = index of center Value = iterator over input data points closest to ith center At each key value, run through the iterator and average all the Corresponding input data points. Emit: (index of center, new center)

35
**Improved Version: Calculate partial sums in mappers**

Mapper - mapper has k centers in memory. Running through one input data point at a time (call it x). Find the index of the closest of the k centers (call it iClosest). Accumulate sum of inputs segregated into K groups depending on which center is closest. Emit: ( , partial sum) Or Emit(index, partial sum) Reducer – accumulate partial sums and Emit with index or without

36
**Issues and Limitations for K-means**

How to choose initial centers? How to choose K? How to handle Outliers? Clusters different in Shape Density Size

37
**Two different K-means Clusterings**

Original Points Optimal Clustering Sub-optimal Clustering

38
**Importance of Choosing Initial Centroids**

39
**Importance of Choosing Initial Centroids**

40
**Importance of Choosing Initial Centroids …**

41
**Importance of Choosing Initial Centroids …**

42
**Solutions to Initial Centroids Problem**

Multiple runs Helps, but probability is not on your side Sample and use hierarchical clustering to determine initial centroids Select more than k initial centroids and then select among these initial centroids Select most widely separated Postprocessing Bisecting K-means Not as susceptible to initialization issues

43
EM-Algorithm

44
**What is MLE? Given X, find Given A sample X={X1, …, Xn}**

A vector of parameters θ We define Likelihood of the data: P(X | θ) Log-likelihood of the data: L(θ)=log P(X|θ) Given X, find

45
MLE (cont) Often we assume that Xis are independently identically distributed (i.i.d.) Depending on the form of p(x|θ), solving optimization problem can be easy or hard.

46
An easy case Assuming A coin has a probability p of being heads, 1-p of being tails. Observation: We toss a coin N times, and the result is a set of Hs and Ts, and there are m Hs. What is the value of p based on MLE, given the observation?

47
An easy case (cont) p= m/N

48
EM: basic concepts

49
**Basic setting in EM X is a set of data points: observed data**

Θ is a parameter vector. EM is a method to find θML where Calculating P(X | θ) directly is hard. Calculating P(X,Y|θ) is much simpler, where Y is “hidden” data (or “missing” data).

50
**The basic EM strategy Z = (X, Y) Z: complete data (“augmented data”)**

X: observed data (“incomplete” data) Y: hidden data (“missing” data)

51
**The log-likelihood function**

L is a function of θ, while holding X constant:

52
**The iterative approach for MLE**

In many cases, we cannot find the solution directly. An alternative is to find a sequence: s.t.

53
Jensen’s inequality

54
Jensen’s inequality log is a concave function

55
**Maximizing the lower bound**

The Q function

56
**The Q-function Define the Q-function (a function of θ):**

Y is a random vector. X=(x1, x2, …, xn) is a constant (vector). Θt is the current parameter estimate and is a constant (vector). Θ is the normal variable (vector) that we wish to adjust. The Q-function is the expected value of the complete data log-likelihood P(X,Y|θ) with respect to Y given X and θt.

57
**The inner loop of the EM algorithm**

E-step: calculate M-step: find

58
**L(θ) is non-decreasing at each iteration**

The EM algorithm will produce a sequence It can be proved that

59
**The inner loop of the Generalized EM algorithm (GEM)**

E-step: calculate M-step: find

60
**Recap of the EM algorithm**

61
**Idea #1: find θ that maximizes the likelihood of training data**

62
**Idea #2: find the θt sequence**

No analytical solution iterative approach, find s.t.

63
**Idea #3: find θt+1 that maximizes a tight lower bound of**

64
**Idea #4: find θt+1 that maximizes the Q function**

Lower bound of The Q function

65
**The EM algorithm Start with initial estimate, θ0**

Repeat until convergence E-step: calculate M-step: find

66
**Important classes of EM problem**

Products of multinomial (PM) models Exponential families Gaussian mixture …

67
**Probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis (PLSA)**

PLSA is a generative model for generating the co-occurrence of documents d∈D={d1,…,dD} and terms w∈W={w1,…,wW}, which associates latent variable z∈Z={z1,…,zZ}. The generative processing is: P(w|z) P(z|d) d1 w1 z1 P(d) w2 z2 d2 … … zZ dD wW

68
**Model The generative process can be expressed by:**

Two independence assumptions: Each pair (d,w) are assumed to be generated independently, corresponding to ‘bag-of-words’ Conditioned on z, words w are generated independently of the specific document d.

69
**co-occurrence times of d and w.**

Model Following the likelihood principle, we detemines P(z), P(d|z), and P(w|z) by maximization of the log-likelihood function co-occurrence times of d and w. P(d), P(z|d), and P(w|d) Unobserved data Observed data

70
**Maximum-likelihood Definition**

We have a density function P(x|Θ) that is govened by the set of parameters Θ, e.g., P might be a set of Gaussians and Θ could be the means and covariances We also have a data set X={x1,…,xN}, supposedly drawn from this distribution P, and assume these data vectors are i.i.d. with P. Then the likehihood function is: The likelihood is thought of as a function of the parameters Θwhere the data X is fixed. Our goal is to find the Θthat maximizes L. That is

71
Jensen’s inequality

72
**Estimation-using EM difficult!!!**

Idea: start with a guess t, compute an easily computed lower-bound B(; t) to the function log P(|U) and maximize the bound instead By Jensen’s inequality:

73
(1)Solve P(w|z) We introduce Lagrange multiplier λwith the constraint that ∑wP(w|z)=1, and solve the following equation:

74
(2)Solve P(d|z) We introduce Lagrange multiplier λwith the constraint that ∑dP(d|z)=1, and get the following result:

75
(3)Solve P(z) We introduce Lagrange multiplier λwith the constraint that ∑zP(z)=1, and solve the following equation:

76
(1)Solve P(z|d,w) We introduce Lagrange multiplier λwith the constraint that ∑zP(z|d,w)=1, and solve the following equation:

77
(4)Solve P(z|d,w) -2

78
**The final update Equations**

E-step: M-step:

79
**Coding Design Variables: Running Processing:**

double[][] p_dz_n // p(d|z), |D|*|Z| double[][] p_wz_n // p(w|z), |W|*|Z| double[] p_z_n // p(z), |Z| Running Processing: Read dataset from file ArrayList<DocWordPair> doc; // all the docs DocWordPair – (word_id, word_frequency_in_doc) Parameter Initialization Assign each elements of p_dz_n, p_wz_n and p_z_n with a random double value, satisfying ∑d p_dz_n=1, ∑d p_wz_n =1, and ∑d p_z_n =1 Estimation (Iterative processing) Update p_dz_n, p_wz_n and p_z_n Calculate Log-likelihood function to see where ( |Log-likelihood – old_Log-likelihood| < threshold) Output p_dz_n, p_wz_n and p_z_n

80
**Coding Design Update p_dz_n For each doc d{**

For each word w included in d { denominator = 0; nominator = new double[Z]; For each topic z { nominator[z] = p_dz_n[d][z]* p_wz_n[w][z]* p_z_n[z] denominator +=nominator[z]; } // end for each topic z For each topic z { P_z_condition_d_w = nominator[j]/denominator; nominator_p_dz_n[d][z] += tfwd*P_z_condition_d_w; denominator_p_dz_n[z] += tfwd*P_z_condition_d_w; }// end for each word w included in d }// end for each doc d For each doc d { For each topic z { p_dz_n_new[d][z] = nominator_p_dz_n[d][z]/ denominator_p_dz_n[z];

81
**Coding Design Update p_wz_n For each doc d{**

For each word w included in d { denominator = 0; nominator = new double[Z]; For each topic z { nominator[z] = p_dz_n[d][z]* p_wz_n[w][z]* p_z_n[z] denominator +=nominator[z]; } // end for each topic z For each topic z { P_z_condition_d_w = nominator[j]/denominator; nominator_p_wz_n[w][z] += tfwd*P_z_condition_d_w; denominator_p_wz_n[z] += tfwd*P_z_condition_d_w; }// end for each word w included in d }// end for each doc d For each w { For each topic z { p_wz_n_new[w][z] = nominator_p_wz_n[w][z]/ denominator_p_wz_n[z];

82
**Coding Design Update p_z_n For each doc d{**

For each word w included in d { denominator = 0; nominator = new double[Z]; For each topic z { nominator[z] = p_dz_n[d][z]* p_wz_n[w][z]* p_z_n[z] denominator +=nominator[z]; } // end for each topic z For each topic z { P_z_condition_d_w = nominator[j]/denominator; nominator_p_z_n[z] += tfwd*P_z_condition_d_w; denominator_p_z_n[z] += tfwd; }// end for each word w included in d }// end for each doc d For each topic z{ p_dz_n_new[d][j] = nominator_p_z_n[z]/ denominator_p_z_n;

83
**Industrial Strength Machine Learning May 2008**

Apache Mahout Industrial Strength Machine Learning May 2008

84
**Current Situation Large volumes of data are now available**

Platforms now exist to run computations over large datasets (Hadoop, HBase) Sophisticated analytics are needed to turn data into information people can use Active research community and proprietary implementations of “machine learning” algorithms The world needs scalable implementations of ML under open license - ASF

85
**History of Mahout Summer 2007 Community formed**

Developers needed scalable ML Mailing list formed Community formed Apache contributors Academia & industry Lots of initial interest Project formed under Apache Lucene January 25, 2008

86
**Current Code Base Matrix & Vector library Clustering**

Memory resident sparse & dense implementations Clustering Canopy K-Means Mean Shift Collaborative Filtering Taste Utilities Distance Measures Parameters

87
**Under Development Naïve Bayes Perceptron PLSI/EM Genetic Programming**

Dirichlet Process Clustering Clustering Examples Hama (Incubator) for very large arrays

88
Appendix From Mahout Hands on, by Ted Dunning and Robin Anil, OSCON 2011, Portland

89
**Step 1 – Convert dataset into a Hadoop Sequence File**

Download (8.2 MB) and extract the SGML files. $ mkdir -p mahout-work/reuters-sgm $ cd mahout-work/reuters-sgm && tar xzf ../reuters21578.tar.gz && cd .. && cd .. Extract content from SGML to text file $ bin/mahout org.apache.lucene.benchmark.utils.ExtractReuters mahout-work/reuters-sgm mahout-work/reuters-out

90
**Step 1 – Convert dataset into a Hadoop Sequence File**

Use seqdirectory tool to convert text file into a Hadoop Sequence File $ bin/mahout seqdirectory \ -i mahout-work/reuters-out \ -o mahout-work/reuters-out-seqdir \ -c UTF-8 -chunk 5

91
Hadoop Sequence File Sequence of Records, where each record is a <Key, Value> pair <Key1, Value1> <Key2, Value2> … <Keyn, Valuen> Key and Value needs to be of class org.apache.hadoop.io.Text Key = Record name or File name or unique identifier Value = Content as UTF-8 encoded string TIP: Dump data from your database directly into Hadoop Sequence Files (see next slide)

92
**Writing to Sequence Files**

Configuration conf = new Configuration(); FileSystem fs = FileSystem.get(conf); Path path = new Path("testdata/part-00000"); SequenceFile.Writer writer = new SequenceFile.Writer( fs, conf, path, Text.class, Text.class); for (int i = 0; i < MAX_DOCS; i++) writer.append(new Text(documents(i).Id()), new Text(documents(i).Content())); } writer.close();

93
**Generate Vectors from Sequence Files**

Steps Compute Dictionary Assign integers for words Compute feature weights Create vector for each document using word-integer mapping and feature-weight Or Simply run $ bin/mahout seq2sparse

94
**Generate Vectors from Sequence Files**

$ bin/mahout seq2sparse \ i mahout-work/reuters-out-seqdir/ \ o mahout-work/reuters-out-seqdir-sparse-kmeans Important options Ngrams Lucene Analyzer for tokenizing Feature Pruning Min support Max Document Frequency Min LLR (for ngrams) Weighting Method TF v/s TFIDF lp-Norm Log normalize length

95
**Start K-Means clustering**

$ bin/mahout kmeans \ i mahout-work/reuters-out-seqdir-sparse-kmeans/tfidf-vectors/ \ c mahout-work/reuters-kmeans-clusters \ o mahout-work/reuters-kmeans \ dm org.apache.mahout.distance.CosineDistanceMeasure –cd 0.1 \ x 10 -k 20 –ow Things to watch out for Number of iterations Convergence delta Distance Measure Creating assignments

96
Inspect clusters $ bin/mahout clusterdump \ s mahout-work/reuters-kmeans/clusters-9 \ d mahout-work/reuters-out-seqdir-sparse-kmeans/dictionary.file-0 \ dt sequencefile -b 100 -n 20 Typical output :VL-21438{n=518 c=[0.56:0.019, 00:0.154, 00.03:0.018, 00.18:0.018, … Top Terms: iran => strike => iranian => union => said => workers => gulf => had => he =>

Similar presentations

OK

Definition Finding groups of objects such that the objects in a group will be similar (or related) to one another and different from (or unrelated to)

Definition Finding groups of objects such that the objects in a group will be similar (or related) to one another and different from (or unrelated to)

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

To make this website work, we log user data and share it with processors. To use this website, you must agree to our Privacy Policy, including cookie policy.

Ads by Google