1. May 2015
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Submission Title: KMP TG9 Opening Report Vancouver 2015
Date Submitted: May 13, 2015
Source: Robert Moskowitz, HTT Consulting
Address: Oak Park, MI, USA
Voice:+1 (248) ,
Re: KMP TG9 Opening Report for May 2015 Session
Abstract: Opening report for the KMP TG9 Session.
Purpose: To focus activities during the meeting
Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.
Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P
Robert Moskowitz, HTT Consulting

2. KMP TG9 Agenda / Opening Report
May 2015
KMP TG9 Agenda / Opening Report
Vancouver, Canada
May 13, 2015
Robert Moskowitz, HTT Consulting

3. May 2015
Abstract
To provide for transport of Key Management Protocols for
Be KMP agnostic
Provide guidelines for specific KMPs like HIP, 802.1X, and IKEv2
To present use scenarios and how a KMP facilitates security in those scenarios.
Robert Moskowitz, HTT Consulting

4. May 2015
Meeting Protocol
Please announce your affiliation when you first address the group during a meeting slot
Robert Moskowitz, HTT Consulting

5. Attendance https://newton.meeting.verilan.com Register
May 2015
Attendance
Register
Indicate attendance
Robert Moskowitz, HTT Consulting

6. Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform
May 2015
All participants in this meeting have certain obligations under the IEEE-SA Patent Policy. Participants:
“Shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of each “holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware” if the claims are owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents
“Personal awareness” means that the participant “is personally aware that the holder may have a potential Essential Patent Claim,” even if the participant is not personally aware of the specific patents or patent claims
“Should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of “any other holders of such potential Essential Patent Claims” (that is, third parties that are not affiliated with the participant, with the participant’s employer, or with anyone else that the participant is from or otherwise represents)
The above does not apply if the patent claim is already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance that applies to the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group
Quoted text excerpted from IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws subclause 6.2
Early identification of holders of potential Essential Patent Claims is strongly encouraged
No duty to perform a patent search
Robert Moskowitz, HTT Consulting

7. Patent Related Links May 2015
All participants should be familiar with their obligations under the IEEE-SA Policies & Procedures for standards development.
Patent Policy is stated in these sources:
IEEE-SA Standards Boards Bylaws
IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual
Material about the patent policy is available at
If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at or visit
This slide set is available at
Robert Moskowitz, HTT Consulting

8. Call for Potentially Essential Patents
May 2015
Call for Potentially Essential Patents
If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance:
Either speak up now or
Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible or
Cause an LOA to be submitted
Robert Moskowitz, HTT Consulting

9. Minutes Review and vote on March 2015 minutes
May 2015
Minutes
Review and vote on March 2015 minutes
tg9-kmp-minutes-for-the- march-2015-interim-meeting-berlin-de.docx
Robert Moskowitz, HTT Consulting

10. Session Items PAR and 5C revision Current Document
May 2015
Session Items
PAR and 5C revision
par-changes.doc
C-changes.doc
Current Document
D3.0_P _Draft_Standard.pdf
Ballot Comment Resolution
p d3-0- comment-resolution.xls
Robert Moskowitz, HTT Consulting

11. Session Items Ballot Recirculation BRC confirmation BRC calls
May 2015
Session Items
Ballot Recirculation
BRC confirmation
BRC calls
Sponsor Ballot
Pool formation ends Jun 11
Robert Moskowitz, HTT Consulting

12. Motion for PAR and 5C Modification
Mar 2015
Motion for PAR and 5C Modification
Motion: request that the modified IEEE TG9 PAR contained in document par-changes.doc and 5C contained in document C-changes.doc be approved for submission to the EC to forward the PAR and 5C to NesCom.
Moved by: Tero Kivinen
Seconded by: Don Sturek
4-0-0
Slide 12
Peter E. Yee, NSA/IAD
Page 12

13. Motion for reaffirmation of BRC for 802.15.9
Mar 2015
Motion for reaffirmation of BRC for
Move that WG reaffirm the constitution of a Ballot Resolution Committee (BRC) for the WG balloting of the draft recommended practice with the following membership: Robert Moskowitz, Tero Kivinen, Don Sturek, Peter Yee, Subir Das, Brian Weis, Gary Stuebing. The BRC is authorized to approve comment resolutions and to approve the start of recirculation ballots of the draft on behalf of the WG. Comment resolution between sessions will be conducted via reflector and via teleconferences announced to the reflector at least 30 days in advance.
Moved by: Phil Beecher
Seconded by: Peter Yee
4-0-0
Slide 13
Peter E. Yee, NSA/IAD
Page 13