Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

English 306A; Harris 1 Linguistic relativity A.K.A. Whorfian hypothesis That different languages shape different perceptions of the world.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "English 306A; Harris 1 Linguistic relativity A.K.A. Whorfian hypothesis That different languages shape different perceptions of the world."— Presentation transcript:

1 English 306A; Harris 1 Linguistic relativity A.K.A. Whorfian hypothesis That different languages shape different perceptions of the world.

2 English 306A; Harris 2 Linguistic relativity A.K.A. Whorfian hypothesis After Benjamin Lee Whorf, author of Language, thought, and reality

3 English 306A; Harris 3 Linguistic relativity A.K.A. Whorfian hypothesis That different languages shape different perceptions of the world.

4 English 306A; Harris 4 Linguistic relativity the principle of linguistic relativity holds that all observers are not led by the same physical evidence to the same picture of the universe, unless their linguistic backgrounds are similar, or can in some way be calibrated (Language, thought, and reality, 214)

5 English 306A; Harris 5 Whorf on Hopi (as a metonym) I find it gratuitous to assume that a Hopi who knows only the Hopi language and the cultural ideas of his own society has the same notions, often supposed to be intuitions, of time and space that we have, and that are generally assumed to be universal. In particular, he has no general notion or intuition of time as a smooth flowing continuum in which everything in the universe proceeds at an equal rate, out of a future, through a present, into a past … In [the] Hopi view, time disappears and space is altered, so that it is no longer the homogeneous and instantaneous timeless space of our supposed intuition or of classical Newtonian mechanics. Language, thought, and reality (56, 58).

6 English 306A; Harris 6 Linguistic relativity hypothesis Strong form Language determines thought; speakers of different languages inhabit different, mutually inaccessible realities Weak form Language influ- ences thought

7 English 306A; Harris 7 Navajo kinship lexicalization (partial) ?akso˘t hakso˘t noyeh hanih hakhnoshe akeÚ˘hak grandmother and her sisters grandfather and his brothers mother and mothers sister father and fathers brother mothers brother fathers sister

8 English 306A; Harris 8 Navajo kinship lexicalization (partial) ?akso˘t hakso˘t noyeh hanih hakhnoshe akeÚ˘hak grandmother and maternal great aunts grandfather and paternal great uncles mother and maternal aunt father and paternal uncle maternal uncle paternal aunt

9 English 306A; Harris 9 Navajo and obligation English I must go there. Navajo It is only good that I go there.

10 English 306A; Harris 10 Navajo and motion one moves into clothing one moves about here and there one moves about newly to move words out of an enclosed space e˘h÷ha˘h na÷ha˘h ani˘÷na÷h a ha÷di÷a˘h

11 English 306A; Harris 11 Navajo and motion e˘h÷ha˘h na÷ha˘h ani˘÷na÷h a ha÷di÷a˘h one dresses one moves about here and there one moves about newly to move words out of an enclosed space

12 English 306A; Harris 12 Navajo and motion one dresses one lives one moves about newly to move words out of an enclosed space e˘h÷ha˘h na÷ha˘h ani˘÷na÷h a ha÷di÷a˘h

13 English 306A; Harris 13 Navajo and motion one dresses one lives one is young to move words out of an enclosed space e˘h÷ha˘h na÷ha˘h ani˘÷na÷ha ha÷di÷a˘h

14 English 306A; Harris 14 Navajo and motion e˘h÷ha˘h na÷ha˘h ani˘÷na÷h a ha÷di÷a˘h one dresses one lives one is young to sing

15 English 306A; Harris 15 Navajo and control English I am riding the horse. Navajo The horse runs for me.

16 English 306A; Harris 16 Navajo worldview (Weltsicht) What is it? Who knows? Is it the same as the SAE worldview? No. Is it compatible with the SAE worldview? Sometimes, sometimes not.

17 English 306A; Harris 17 to-strike-with-foot in Navajo and English English [kHIk] The horse kicked the mule. The mule kicked the horse. The man kicked the horse. The horse kicked the man. Navajo [yizta¬] The horse kicked the mule. The mule kicked the horse. The man kicked the horse. The horse kicked the man.

18 English 306A; Harris 18 English and striking-with-foot English kick The horse kicked the mule. The horse controlled the action. The horse struck the mule with its foot/feet. The mule did not help bring this action about. Partial overlap in meaning with [yizta¬], but low relevance Full overlap in meaning with [yizta¬], high relevance Full mismatch with [yizta¬], complete irrelevance

19 English 306A; Harris 19 Navajo and striking-with-foot Navajo kicking [yizta¬] The horse kicked the man. The horse controlled the action. The horse struck the mule with its foot/feet. The man did not help bring this action about. Semantically anomalous: horses cant control actions that impact humans

20 English 306A; Harris 20 RoleDefinition Agent The entity that performs the action Patient The entity undergoing the action; the object of the experience Experiencer The entity that experiences the state Receiver The entity that receives something from the action Beneficiary The entity that benefits from the action Essive Anything predicated by the (main) verb to be Possessor The entity who possesses something. Source The starting point for a movement Goal The end point for a movement Path The route over which movement happens Time The time an event occurs Location The place an event happens Semantic Roles

21 English 306A; Harris 21 RoleEvent Schemata Agent DOING, MOVING, TRANSFERRING Patient BEING, HAPPENING, DOING, EXPERIENCING, HAVING, MOVING, TRANSFERRING Experiencer EXPERIENCING Receiver TRANSFERRING Essive BEING Possessor HAVING, TRANSFERRING Source MOVING, TRANSFERRING Goal Path Time ALL Location Semantic Roles

22 English 306A; Harris 22 Navajo Agency yizta¬ mules and horses, reciprocal agency non-human-animate non-human-animate humans and horses (and mules), unilateral agency human non-human-animate kick mules, horses, humans, reciprocal agency animate animate (assuming an intension that includes feet, locomotive capacity, etc.)

23 English 306A; Harris 23 Semantic primes I, YOU, SOMEONE, WANT, HEAR, NOT, CAUSE, BECOME, AND, GOOD, BAD, WORD, MALE, FEMALE, HAVE, …

24 English 306A; Harris 24 Semantic primes FRED CAUSE-PAST (BARNEY BECOME NOT-ALIVE) Fred killed Barney Barney is dead BARNEY BE NOT-ALIVE Barney died. BARNEY BECOME-PAST NOT-ALIVE FRED CAUSE-PAST (BARNEY BECOME NOT-ALIVE) WITH BAD- INTENT WITH PLAN Fred murdered Barney

25 English 306A; Harris 25 Navajo and motion SOMEONE GO INTO CLOTHING SOMEONE GO HERE AND THERE SOMEONE NEW GO TO CAUSE (WORDS GO OUT FROM CONTAINER) e˘h÷ha˘h na÷ha˘h ani˘÷na÷ha ha÷di÷a˘h

26 English 306A; Harris 26 Navajo and control/causation English I am riding the horse. I BE ON HORSE; I CAUSE (HORSE GO) Navajo The horse runs for me. I BE ON HORSE; HORSE CAUSE (HORSE GO-FOR-ME)

27 English 306A; Harris 27 Navajo and control/causation English I am riding the horse. Agent Patient Navajo The horse runs for me. Agent Beneficiary

28 English 306A; Harris 28 Navajo and control/causation English I am riding the horse. Doing, V 2 Navajo The horse runs for me. Doing, V 1 ( V COMP )

29 English 306A; Harris 29 Navajo and control/causation English I am riding the horse. Doing, V 2 Navajo The horse runs for me. Doing, V 1 ( V COMP ) Navajo and English use the same basic resources (Universality) to different effects. They can be mapped into one another (Parity).

30 English 306A; Harris 30 Colour terms 2-color system: black, white 3-color system: black, white, red 4-color system: black, white, red, yellow or GRUE 5-color system: black, white, red, yellow, GRUE 6-color system: black, white, red, yellow, green, blue then purple, pink, orange, gray

31 English 306A; Harris 31 white black red GRUE yellow green blue purple pink orange gray Colour terms yellow GRUE There is something about the world, our brains, or our eyes (or any combination thereof) that constrains lexicalization.

32 English 306A; Harris 32 Linguistic relativity the principle of linguistic relativity holds that all observers are not led by the same physical evidence to the same picture of the universe, unless their linguistic backgrounds are similar, or can in some way be calibrated (Language, thought, and reality, 214)

33 English 306A; Harris 33 Linguistic relativity the principle of linguistic relativity holds that all observers are not led by the same physical evidence to the same picture of the universe, unless their linguistic backgrounds are similar, or can in some way be calibrated (Language, thought, and reality, 214)

34 English 306A; Harris 34 Cross-linguistic calibrators Semantic primes. Semantic roles. Event schemata. Verb-argument structure Perception. (goodwill, common-interests, …)

35 English 306A; Harris 35 Linguistic relativity hypothesis Strong form Language determines thought; speakers of different languages inhabit different, mutually inaccessible realities Weak form Language influences thought There are cultural Misunderstandings. Translation is impossible.

36 English 306A; Harris 36 Linguistic relativity hypothesis Strong form Language determines thought; speakers of different languages inhabit different, mutually inaccessible realities Weak form Language influ- ences thought

37 English 306A; Harris 37 Semantics The proposition and truth conditions. Entailment Denotation Intension Extension Event schemata and semantic roles redux Semantic primes Ambiguity Linguistic relativity Universality Semantic roles Semantic primes Cognitive and experiential universals Colour systems Parity (calibration)


Download ppt "English 306A; Harris 1 Linguistic relativity A.K.A. Whorfian hypothesis That different languages shape different perceptions of the world."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google