Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

UAB, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Pre-proposal committee meeting H. Deshpande, Dec. 7 th, 2007 Comparison of Single-shot Methods for R2* estimation.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "UAB, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Pre-proposal committee meeting H. Deshpande, Dec. 7 th, 2007 Comparison of Single-shot Methods for R2* estimation."— Presentation transcript:

1 UAB, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Pre-proposal committee meeting H. Deshpande, Dec. 7 th, 2007 Comparison of Single-shot Methods for R2* estimation

2 Outline 1. Relationship between BOLD and R2* and significance of reliable R2* estimate 2. MEPIDW, existing single-shot R2* estimation technique 3. Limitations of existing technique 4. How does SS-PARSE compute the parameters 5. Project – Check the performance of SS-PARSE acquisition in 3.5 and 3.8 g/cm trajectories. 6. Comparisons based on: a) R2* maps, b) M0 maps, c) TSD of R2*, d) TSD vs R2*, e) TSD vs gmax f) TSD vs slice thickness 7. Discussion: Which factors contribute towards performance of SS-PARSE - gmax values, shimming, signal strength, R2* range, presence of inhomogeneity (frequency drifts due to air bubbles or in change of GM/WM/CSF in human or primate brain)

3 BOLD effect and R2* Governed by equation:

4 Significance of reliable R2* estimation fMRI Estimation of Neuronal activity BOLD effect R2*

5 MEPI: Single-shot R2* estimation

6 Limitations of MEPI Uses a signal model where R2* isnt measured directly, rather one where R2* is inferred from signal changes over time Estimation is subject to: I. Choice of echo times II. Field inhomogenity (either inherent or because of shimming) III. Trade-off between slice thickness and through slice de- phasing Geometric distortion introduced as a result of field inhomogenity

7 SS-PARSE Conventional model Estimate map M(x) Include local phase evolution exp(-i (x)t) and local signal decay exp(-R 2 * (x) t) s(t)= M(x) exp[-(R 2 * (x) +i (x))t] exp(-2iπk(t)x)dx Estimate maps (images) of M(x), R 2 * (x), (x) SS-PARSE model M(x) (x) R 2 * (x)

8 Project Goals - experimental Create gradient waveforms and generate trajectories for 7 different gradient strengths (1.9 gauss/cm to 3.8 gauss/cm): Implement the sequence on Varian 4.7T vertical scanner using phantoms as study subjects Compare performance of SS-PARSE with MEPI based on: 1. Accuracy of R2* estimates (compare with Gradient-Echo results) 2. Temporal variability of R2* (over time-series of 50 acquisitions) 3. Find correlation between R2* and TSD values 4. Find correlation between slice thickness and TSD values 5. Find correlation between maximum gradient strength and TSD Gmax = 1.9 gauss/cmGmax = 3.8 gauss/cm Lower k-space coverageLarger k-space coverage Fewer data pointsMore data points Faster parameter estimationSlightly parameter estimation Higher SNR w.r.t. other gmax valuesLower SNR w.r.t. other gmax values

9 Project goals – Theoretical Inferences Factors contributing towards performance of SS-PARSE: 1. gmax values – Find relationship between gmax and R2* estimates (compared with gradient-echo values) gmax and TSD 2. Shimming – Find effects of field inhomogenity in SS-PARSE. Also observe the effects in MEPI studies performed under similar B 0 conditions. 3. Signal strength – Find trade-off between signal strength (proportional to slice thickness) and through slice de-phasing over different slice thicknesses. 4. Performance range of R2*- Observe the changes in temporal behaviour over range of R2* values. Of particular interest to us is the range of R2* found in brain (20 to 40 ms in 4.7T systems)

10 Preliminary Results - Trajectories gmax = 1.9 g/cmgmax = 2.29 g/cm gmax = 2.5 g/cm gmax = 2.9 g/cm gmax = 3.2 g/cmgmax = 3.5 g/cm gmax = 3.8 g/cm

11 Preliminary Results – Calibration and Estimation Calibration Trajectory Phantom Data Parameter Maps

12 Acquisition and Reconstruction Overview 1. SS-PARSE acquisitions 1 study =(7x gmax) x (4x slice thickness) x (50x repetitions) =1400 acquisitions 6 studies= 1400 x 6 =8400 acquisitions 2. SS-PARSE Reconstruction Time 1 Recon 4 minutes minutes 24 days 3. EPI acquisitions 1 study=(4x slice thickness) x (50x repetitions) =200 acquisitions 6 studies=200 x 6 =1200 acquisitions 4. Gradient –echo acquisitions 1 study=15 echoes =15 acquisitions 6 studies=15 x 6 =90 acquisitions

13 Preliminary Reconstructions 1.9 g/cm 2.29 g/cm 2.9 g/cm Analogous EPI Images

14 Inhomogeneity Conditions* Geometric distortion observed in MEPI acquisitions SS-PARSE gives parameter maps with no geometric distortion (in progress)

15 Timeline TaskDuration Data AcquisitionIn progress Analysis and ThesisDec. to Jan DefenseFeb.

16 Thank you


Download ppt "UAB, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Pre-proposal committee meeting H. Deshpande, Dec. 7 th, 2007 Comparison of Single-shot Methods for R2* estimation."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google