Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Water Conservation in Kelowna. Why?. The Okanagan.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Water Conservation in Kelowna. Why?. The Okanagan."— Presentation transcript:

1 Water Conservation in Kelowna. Why?

2 The Okanagan

3

4

5

6

7 Kelowna Water Providers Five purveyors – RWD: Groundwater – CITY: Lake – GEID: Upland + lake – BMID: Upland – SEKID: Upland + ground

8 Kelowna Water Providers 2012/2013 Water Rates BMIDSEKIDGEIDRWWCITY Fixed$32.27$38.00$44.00$15.44$9.25 Rate | max$0.000 | 18.9$0.322 | 30 $0.388 | 49.2$0.433 | 80 $0.436 | 87.1$0.657 | 125 $0.584$ m 2 $32.27$38.00$44.00$23.63$29.34

9 Kelowna Water Providers

10

11 Benefits of Conservation Dual Flush Toilet, – $200, two per house ($400 total) – Toilet, 29% of ~25 m 3 / month indoor – Save $16.42 per year, – 5% pays same! – NET RETURN NEGATIVE!!! BUT – Positive if replacing or new build.

12 Benefits of Conservation Xeriscape, say 75% less outdoor water. – Save expensive peak water, ~$120 / yr Depends on yard size, etc. – Conversion cost, ~ $8/ft 2 66x120 yard, ~30K convert – $2,400 at 5% pays $120 / yr – NET RETURN NEGATIVE!!! BUT – New yard, incremental cost

13 Benefits of Conservation Household perspective 1.Save some money (CITY, RWD) – Not enough for replace, but maybe new install. – No savings if not priced (BMID, SEKID, GEID). 2.Avoid penalties or damage – Fine/cutoff if violate outdoor watering bans – Damage risk for sensitive plants 3.Doing good for community / environment.

14 Benefits of Conservation For utility, delay capital costs. – Delay $20M one year, save $400K interest (5%). – Kelowna, reduce average water use 2.5% per year, buy 20 yrs.

15 Research Project Residential Survey: – Environmental attitudes – Okanagan water knowledge – Residence characteristics – Demographics – Conservation behaviors Investments inside Investments outside Behaviors

16 Research Project Data collection – Canada411 address and phone number harvest, Stratified by water provider and near borders. – Telephone survey with internet option (2008), 80% respondents chose internet! – Mail survey with internet option (2009), – Forgot to ask responent age! Follow up telephone contact. – 516 returned surveys (337 with age).

17 Research Project

18 Conservation Indoor Conservation Investment CountPercent Tap Aerator19638 Low Flow Showerhead36671 Low Flow Toilet29457 Efficient Laundry Machine24547 Efficient Dish Washer21241 Greywater system51

19 Conservation Outdoor Conservation Investment CountPercent Water Less26151 Low water grass6913 Moisture Probe122 Timed Irrigation35669 Rain Barrel6112 Greywater System20 Soil Amendment20039 Pool Cover5811 Gravel16432 Xeriscaping13426

20 Conservation Conservation Behaviors CountPercent Scrape Dishes25750 Wash in Basin20339 Turn off tap while brushing teeth41480 Turn shower off when soaping up7414 If it is yellow, let it mellow, …24848 Use dishwasher when full43584 Use laundry machine when full45588

21 Conservation BMIDSEKIDGEIDRWDCITYOTHER In House On Yard Behavior No significant difference across providers – Measure total number of activities undertaken. What, no price effect!!! – Examine interactions – Examine matched sample.

22 Matched Samples Question: If I am near a border, do I act like people far from the border? OR Is my behavior influenced by behavior of people nearby who pay differently? Answer: Compare similar people near and away from border.

23 Matched Samples Matching 1.Near border = treat. 2.Away = control 3.For each near obs., find similar far obs. 4.Compare variables of interest between treatment and control.

24 Matched Samples Comparing within, not between purveyors. – All in group face same rate. – All in group get same bills, other info from purveyors. – Between purveyors, uncertain of cause Price effect Information campaign effect Subsidy programs Different rules (lawn watering, etc.)

25 Matched Samples GroupTreatmentVariableNDiff (N)P-valueDiff (2N)P-Value FLATnear PAYInside FLATnear PAYOutside FLATnear PAYBehave PAYnear FLATInside PAYnear FLATOutside PAYnear FLATBehave – Effect direction (mostly) consistent with price. – Existence consistent with social influence. – PRICE MATTERS AND NEIGHBOURS MATTER!

26 Implications Volumetric pricing has an influence – All else equal, 3 of 4 undertake one more conservation activity indoor and one outdoor. Neighbour effects powerful. – Price effect not dominant. Policy can use neighbour effect – Identify good behavior and recognize locally – Provide comparison info vs good behavior.


Download ppt "Water Conservation in Kelowna. Why?. The Okanagan."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google