Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Alia Shahzad Head of QA / QC Bayer Pakistan, Lahore Plant.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Alia Shahzad Head of QA / QC Bayer Pakistan, Lahore Plant."— Presentation transcript:

1 Alia Shahzad Head of QA / QC Bayer Pakistan, Lahore Plant.

2 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 2 Complete Name:Mrs. Alia Shahzad Complete Name:Mrs. Alia Shahzad Qualification:B. Pharm (PU) Qualification:B. Pharm (PU) M. Phil – Pharmacology (PU) Position in Bayer:Head of QA / QC Position in Bayer:Head of QA / QC Technical Experience:17 years Technical Experience:17 years Areas of Interest:- Validations & Qualifications Areas of Interest:- Validations & Qualifications - Aseptic Processing - GMP Inspections & Compliance - Compendial Harmonization Introduction of Presenter

3 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 3 WATER FOR INJECTION STORAGE, SAMPLING, TESTING REQUIRTEMENTS AND QUALIFICATION

4 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 4 Contents of the Presentation PART 1 Water Systems PART 2 Monitoring - Sampling and Testing Frequencies PART 3 Physical, Chemical and Microbiological Testing Parameters PART 4 Testing Methods and Requirements Alert and Action Levels Documentation and Trending of Data Monitored PART 5 Qualification and Requalification of Process Systems PART 6 Particular Considerations for Water Systems

5 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 5 Definitions Water systems Hot systems are operated above 70 °C Cold systems are operated in the range between 2°C and 10°C Ambient systems are operated in the range of the environment in which the system is located. Purified water systems can be operated at any temperature. WFI systems are preferably operated hot and with continuous recirculation to control microbial growth. When WFI is stored and distributed at cold or ambient temperatures, special precautions are taken to prevent the ingress and proliferation of microbial contaminants, as e.g. appropriate sanitization cycles which are defined as part of the system qualification Water systems (water used for product compounding or final rinsing of surfaces which will contact the product), are typically operated in the temperate ranges hot, ambient and cold:

6 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 6 Water Systems (1) The water system distribution Configuration should allow for the continuous flow of water in the piping by means of recirculation. The use of non-recirculating, dead-end, or one-way systems or systems segments should be avoided whenever possible. storage tank feed water points of use loop

7 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 7 Water Systems (2) Pharmaceutical water - used for product compounding or final rinsing of surfaces - exists in different (compendial) qualities such as: Preparation of the different types of water must be performed according to current USP and/or European Pharmacopoeia requirements and - if applicable - according to other pharmacopoeias (e.g. Japanese) and local requirements.

8 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 8 Contents of the Presentation PART 1 Water Systems PART 2 Monitoring - Sampling and Testing Frequencies PART 3 Physical, Chemical and Microbiological Testing Parameters PART 4 Testing Methods and Requirements Alert and Action Levels Documentation and Trending of Data Monitored PART 5 Qualification and Requalification of Process Systems PART 6 Particular Considerations for Water Systems

9 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 9 Monitoring – General Requirements Water systems undergo periodic monitoring of the specified required characteristics. The monitoring program is based on the results of the qualification* work and/or according to the results of a risk assessment. Monitoring is performed according to written procedures, describing in sufficient detail the responsibilities for sampling, the sampling sites, and the sampling frequencies. Typical minimum sampling frequencies for process systems are described in slide Higher or lower sampling frequencies for specific processes or products are justified according to the results of a risk assessment.

10 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 10 Sampling Sampling sites must be selected based on a risk evaluation and / or as result of the initial qualification. Samples have to be taken from representative locations within the distribution and processing system. Selection of sampling sites must not compromise the quality (e.g.: microbiological status) of the system being monitored. The sampling plan has to be dynamic allowing for adjustments to sampling frequency and locations based on system performance trends. When routine monitoring points are reduced or increased, the reason for the change has to be documented. Sampling practice must simulate the use of a process system during manufacturing, for example where water for manufacturing is delivered through a hose, sampling has to be performed through this hose.

11 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 11 Monitoring – Typical Minimum Sampling & Testing Frequencies 1

12 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 12 Monitoring – Typical Minimum Sampling & Testing Frequencies 2 Presentation Topic

13 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 13 Sampling Point & Point of Use Preparation Vessel point of use = sampling point sampling point Sampling Point & Point of Use may or may not be the same (see the diagram below): Monitoring – Typical Minimum Sampling & Testing Frequencies 3

14 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 14 UV Disinfection unit Points of Use Return Storage Tank Mixed ion exchange bed Particle Filter Pump Ventilation Filter Particle Filter UV disinfection unit Feed Water Inflow Monitoring – Typical Minimum Sampling & Testing Frequencies 4

15 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 15 System-specific sampling points Relevant sampling points (API/Potable water) Critical points of use Selected sampling points Selected sampling points for Endotoxin testing depend on the construction and the technical conditions of the installation or system (e.g. begin and end [=return] of the distribution system). evenly distributed throughout the plant (e.g. one sampling point per floor). depend on the individual manufacturing process (e.g. from which water is taken… - for cleaning product contacting surfaces - during final crystallization of APIs - for final rinsing of product contacting - for aqueous granulation processes) not directly relevant for the production (e.g. in cleaning/washing areas) where purified water is ultra-filtered to meet the endotoxin specification) Monitoring – Typical Minimum Sampling & Testing Frequencies 5

16 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 16 Return Inflow Monitoring – Typical Minimum Sampling & Testing Frequencies 6

17 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 17 System-specific sampling points Relevant sampling points (API/Potable water) Critical points of use Selected sampling points Selected sampling points for Endotoxine testing depend on the constrction and the technical conditions of the installation or system (e.g. begin and end [=return] of the distribution system). evenly distributed throughout the plant (e.g. one sampling point per floor). depend on the individual manufacturing process (e.g. from which water is taken… - for cleaning product contacting surfaces - during final crystallization of APIs - for final rinsing of product contacting - for aqueous granulation processes) not directly relevant for the production (e.g. in cleaning/washing areas) where purified water is ultra-filtered to meet the endotoxin specification) Monitoring – Typical Minimum Sampling & Testing Frequencies 7

18 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 18 process-relevant but not critical: organic coating critical: aqueous coating Monitoring – Typical Minimum Sampling & Testing Frequencies 8

19 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 19 System-specific sampling points Relevant sampling points (API/Potable water) Critical points of use Selected sampling points Selected sampling points for Endotoxine testing depend on the constrction and the technical conditions of the installation or system (e.g. begin and end [=return] of the distribution system). evenly distributed throughout the plant (e.g. one sampling point per floor). depend on the individual manufacturing process (e.g. from which water is taken… - for cleaning product contacting surfaces - during final crystallization of APIs - for final rinsing of product contacting - for aqueous granulation processes) not directly relevant for the production (e.g. in cleaning/washing areas) where purified water is ultra-filtered to meet the endotoxin specification) Monitoring – Typical Minimum Sampling & Testing Frequencies 9

20 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 20 selected: washing/cleaning Monitoring – Typical Minimum Sampling & Testing Frequencies 10

21 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 21 Contents of the Presentation PART 1 Water Systems PART 2 Monitoring - Sampling and Testing Frequencies PART 3 Physical, Chemical and Microbiological Testing Parameters PART 4 Testing Methods and Requirements Alert and Action Levels Documentation and Trending of Data Monitored PART 5 Qualification and Requalification of Process Systems PART 6 Particular Considerations for Water Systems

22 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 22 Physical, Chemical and Microbiological Testing Parameters TEST MODULESPECIFICATIONSREFERENCE Appearance Clear, Colorless LiquidPh. Eur. and USP Conductivity < 1.1 µS / cm (20 o C) or values as per Ph. Eur. TablePh. Eur. and USP Ammonium Not more intense in color than reference, corresponding to < 0.05 ppm JP Chlorides Complies to the testJP Nitrates and Nitrites Not more intense in color than reference, corresponding to < 0.2 ppm Ph. Eur. and JP Total Organic Carbon (TOC) < 0.5 mg / LPh. Eur. and USP Oxidizable Substances Complies to the testJP Acidity or Alkalinity Complies to the testJP Heavy Metals Not more intense in color than reference, corresponding to < 0.1 ppm Ph. Eur. and JP Sulfates Complies to the testJP Residue on Evaporation < 10 ppmJP Microbial Contamination max. 10 cfu / 100 mlPh. Eur. and USP Bacterial Endotoxins < 0.25 EU / mlPh. Eur. and JP

23 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 23 Contents of the Presentation PART 1 Water Systems PART 2 Monitoring - Sampling and Testing Frequencies PART 3 Physical, Chemical and Microbiological Testing Parameters PART 4 Testing Methods and Requirements Alert and Action Levels Documentation and Trending of Data Monitored PART 5 Qualification and Requalification of Process Systems PART 6 Particular Considerations for Water Systems

24 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 24 Test Methods and Method Requirements All methods must be performed according to current USP and/or European Pharmacopoeia and, if applicable other pharmacopoeia and/or local requirements (e.g. in case of potable water). All methods or culture media have to be suitable to detect microorganisms that may be present. The cultivation conditions, are selected to be appropriate for the specific growth requirements of microorganisms to be detected, for example: Total aerobic count can be obtained by incubating at 30 to 35 °C for not less than three days Suitable culture media (low nutrient medium) is used for monitoring of water systems (30 to 35°C, at least 5 days). Testing of viable monitoring samples is performed under aerobic conditions unless there are indications that the process is at risk for contamination with anaerobic microorganisms. It must be assured that cleaning or disinfection agents remaining on surfaces sampled does not interfere with microbial recovery when methods using culture media are applied.

25 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 25 Contents of the Presentation PART 1 Water Systems PART 2 Monitoring - Sampling and Testing Frequencies PART 3 Physical, Chemical and Microbiological Testing Parameters PART 4 Testing Methods and Requirements Alert and Action Levels Documentation and Trending of Data Monitored PART 5 Qualification and Requalification of Process Systems PART 6 Particular Considerations for Water Systems

26 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 26 Alert and Action Level in Microbiological Monitoring (1) An Alert level in microbiological monitoring is that level of microorganisms that shows significant differences from normal operating conditions. Alert levels are usually based upon historical information gained from the routine operation of the process in a specific controlled environment. In a new facility, these levels are based on prior experience from similar facilities/ processes. Alert levels are re-examined and – if necessary – re-set at an established frequency. Trends that show a deterioration of the environmental quality require respective CAPAs. An Action level is that specification level of microorganisms or particles that when exceeded requires immediate follow-up and, if necessary, corrective action. Common procedure of setting alter level based on a set of at least 12 months data: 95% of all results < alert level AND 5 % of all results alert level Typically, the initial alert level is set to… 50 % of the action level (specification limit)

27 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 27 Alert and Action Level in Microbiological Monitoring (2) Procedures when an Alert level is exceeded Exceeding the Alert level does not necessarily require a definitive corrective action, but it prompts at least documented follow-up measures, as established in a local procedure. These measures include but are not limited to the following: oComparison with results obtained concurrently with other related sampling points. oComparison with historical data from the same sampling point. oIf possible re-sampling of the affected sampling point; routine sample(s) taken from the affected point(s) within this period can be considered as resample. no further Alert level => no additional action again Alert level exceeding => repetition of re- sampling according to the procedure described above consecutive Alert level exceeding => escalation of measures (e.g. following the procedures of exceeding an Action level)

28 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 28 Action and Alert Level in Microbiological Monitoring (3) Procedures when an Action level is exceeded As soon as an Action level excursion is reported, immediate corrective actions and an investigation have to be performed as described in a local procedure. An evaluation of the potential impact this exceeding has on manufactured products has to be made. When a definitive cause for the excursion can be determined immediately, specific corrective actions are performed before re-sampling starts. Re-sampling of the affected points has to be performed immediately after the implementation of immediate / specific corrective actions. Monitoring critical sampling points includes routine identification of microorganisms to the species (or, where appropriate, genus)level at least when Alert and Action Levels are exceeded.

29 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 29 Contents of the Presentation PART 1 Water Systems PART 2 Monitoring - Sampling and Testing Frequencies PART 3 Physical, Chemical and Microbiological Testing Parameters PART 4 Testing Methods and Requirements Alert and Action Levels Documentation and Trending of Data Monitored PART 5 Qualification and Requalification of Process Systems PART 6 Particular Considerations for Water Systems

30 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 30 Documentation and Trending of Monitoring Data All monitoring activities are documented properly (typically on form sheets which are laid down in SOPs). The results from critical sampling locations must be assignable to the respective activity at the time of sampling (important in case of batch-related monitoring, i.e. the environmental monitoring data must have a formal linkage to product release as defined by procedures). Monitoring data must be summarized on a periodic basis and issued to the responsible senior management on a periodic basis (e.g. via Product Quality Review). Based on this summary, trends have to be evaluated and corrective action to be defined, if appropriate.

31 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 31 Q & A Purified water systems have to be sampled (monitored) daily for microbiological testing. For chemical/physical testing of water systems, it is highly recommended to define the last point of use (return) in the system as a routine sampling point. Any Alert Level excursion initiates an immediate OoS-procedure. Purified water with endotoxin limit is required for the final purification of a non-sterile API to be used in a sterile parenteral Drug Product.

32 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 32 Contents of the Presentation PART 1 Water Systems PART 2 Monitoring - Sampling and Testing Frequencies PART 3 Physical, Chemical and Microbiological Testing Parameters PART 4 Testing Methods and Requirements Alert and Action Levels Documentation and Trending of Data Monitored PART 5 Qualification and Requalification of Process Systems PART 6 Particular Considerations for Water Systems

33 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 33 Process Systems – General Qualification Provisions Qualification is required for any process system (e.g. Water, Nitrogen, Clean Steam, Compressed Air) … that is involved in the manufacture of APIs (beginning with the regulatory starting materials), Drug Products or intermediates that may affect testing results of an API, Drug Product or intermediate, that is involved in final cleaning processes, where the utility supplied directly contacts an API, Drug Product or intermediate, where the utility supplied comes in contact with surfaces that have direct contact with APIs, Drug Products or intermediates, … and, therefore, could have an impact on the quality of the API, Drug Product or intermediate.

34 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 34 Prerequisites for Qualification of Process Systems Before beginning the qualification of a process system, the following documentation has to be available:

35 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 35 Test Items for Qualification of Process Systems (1) Following table outlines parameters and aspects to be checked, evaluated and tested within the qualification study of a process system, provided that these are relevant for the particular qualification (see following slide).

36 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 36 Test Items for Qualification of Process Systems (2) Based on this table, the qualification team determines by means of a risk-based approach … the sampling points, e.g. by answering the following questions… Which points of use are critical ? Which points of use are system-specific ? Is it necessary to realize a particular sampling point (due to the unattainability of the point of use) ? Usually, selected sampling points include… significant points of use return loop points prior to and after each significant treatment step storage tank

37 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 37 Requalification of Process Systems For-Cause Requalification Generally, in case of changes or modifications, the same test items apply for requalification as for initial qualification. However, based on a risk evaluation, the extent of a requalification may be reduced in comparison to the initial qualification. Periodic Requalification The following periodic requalification intervals apply: However, the regular evaluation of the existing documentation such as… monitoring data, quarterly reports, change documentation, logbooks, maintenance/servicing documentation, technical reports … equates to periodic requalification, provided that relevant requalification item are appropriately covered. streamlined requalification approach

38 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 38 Contents of the Presentation PART 1 Water Systems PART 2 Monitoring - Sampling and Testing Frequencies PART 3 Physical, Chemical and Microbiological Testing Parameters PART 4 Testing Methods and Requirements Alert and Action Levels Documentation and Trending of Data Monitored PART 5 Qualification and Requalification of Process Systems PART 6 Particular Considerations for Water Systems

39 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 39 Particular Considerations for Water Systems (1) In case of water systems, the qualification process entails a three-phase approach in order to satisfy the objective of demonstrating the reliability and robustness of the system in service over an extended period.

40 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 40 Particular Considerations for Water Systems (2) Phase 1: Initial phase, usually taking 2 to 4 weeks, serves to establish operating parameters and procedures, Does not end until the system operates stable and within the required ranges, Might be shortened in case of modifications to a water system already in use. Phase 2: Short-term control phase usually taking 2 to 4 weeks, serves to demonstrate consistent operation within the established ranges, Before water is permitted to be used for pharmaceutical purposes, an interim qualification report is required, documenting the successful completion of Phase 2. However, water can also be used for pharmaceutical purposes during this phase, provided that the respective batches are not released until the interim qualification report has been finalized.

41 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 41 Particular Considerations for Water Systems (3) Phase 3: Long-term control phase usually taking 1 year, serves to demonstrate continuous and consistent operation irrespectively of external and seasonal variations. Physico-chemical properties, microbial counts (as well as endotoxin where required) are monitored and evaluated at close intervals, Where the season affects the quality of the feed water (e.g. potable water), sampling should be increased. Phase 3 ends with the preparation of the final Qualification Report.

42 Alia Shahzad, Head of QA / QC Water for Injection Page 42


Download ppt "Alia Shahzad Head of QA / QC Bayer Pakistan, Lahore Plant."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google