Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Plant water relations Gaylon S. Campbell, Ph.D. Decagon Devices and Washington State University.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Plant water relations Gaylon S. Campbell, Ph.D. Decagon Devices and Washington State University."— Presentation transcript:

1 Plant water relations Gaylon S. Campbell, Ph.D. Decagon Devices and Washington State University

2 Plants fundamental dilemma Biochemistry requires a highly hydrated environment (> -3 MPa) Atmospheric environment provides CO 2 and light but is dry (-100 MPa)

3 Water potential Describes how tightly water is bound in the soil Describes the availability of water for biological processes Defines the flow of water in all systems (including SPAC)

4 Water flow in the Soil Plant Atmosphere Continuum (SPAC) Low water potential High water potential Boundary layer conductance to water vapor flow Root conductance to liquid water flow Stomatal conductance to water vapor flow

5 Indicators of plant water stress Soil water potential Leaf stomatal conductance Leaf water potential

6 Indicator #1: Leaf water potential Ψ leaf is potential of water in leaf outside of cells (only matric potential) The water outside cells is in equilibrium with the water inside the cell, so, Ψ cell = Ψ leaf

7 Leaf water potential Turgid leaf: Ψ leaf = Ψ cell = turgor pressure (Ψ p ) + osmotic potential (Ψ o ) of water inside cell Flaccid leaf: Ψ leaf = Ψ cell = Ψ o (no positive pressure component)

8 Measuring leaf water potential There is no direct way to measure leaf water potential Equilibrium methods used exclusively Liquid equilibration methods - Create equilibrium between sample and area of known water potential across semi- permeable barrier Pressure chamber Vapor equilibration methods - Measure humidity air in vapor equilibrium with sample Thermocouple psychrometer Dew point potentiameter

9 Liquid equilibration: pressure chamber Used to measure leaf water potential (ψ leaf ) Equilibrate pressure inside chamber with suction inside leaf Sever petiole of leaf Cover with wet paper towel Seal in chamber Pressurize chamber until moment sap flows from petiole Range: 0 to -6 MPa

10 Two commercial pressure chambers

11 Vapor equilibration: chilled mirror dewpoint hygrometer Lab instrument Measures both soil and plant water potential in the dry range Can measure Ψ leaf Insert leaf disc into sample chamber Measurement accelerated by abrading leaf surface with sandpaper Range: -0.1 MPa to -300 MPa

12 Pressure chamber – in situ comparison

13 Vapor equilibration: in situ leaf water potential Field instrument Measures Ψ leaf Clip on to leaf (must have good seal) Must carefully shade clip Range: -0.1 to -5 MPa

14 Leaf water potential as an indicator of plant water status Can be an indicator of water stress in perennial crops Maximize crop production (table grapes) Schedule deficit irrigation (wine grapes) Many annual plants will shed leaves rather than allow leaf water potential to change past a lower threshold Non-irrigated potatoes Most plants will regulate stomatal conductance before allowing leaf water potential to change below threshold

15 Case study #1 Washington State University apples Researchers used pressure chamber to monitor leaf water potential of apple trees One set well-watered One set kept under water stress Results ½ as much vegetative growth – less pruning Same amount of fruit production Higher fruit quality Saved irrigation water

16 Indicator #2: Stomatal conductance Describes gas diffusion through plant stomata Plants regulate stomatal aperture in response to environmental conditions Described as either a conductance or resistance Conductance is reciprocal of resistance 1/resistance

17 Stomatal conductance Can be good indicator of plant water status Many plants regulate water loss through stomatal conductance

18 Fick's Law for gas diffusion E Evaporation (mol m -2 s -1 ) CConcentration (mol mol -1 ) RResistance (m 2 s mol -1 ) Lleaf aair

19 Boundary layer resistance of the leaf stomatal resistance of the leaf r vs C vt C va r va C vs

20 Do stomata control leaf water loss? Still air: boundary layer resistance controls Moving air: stomatal resistance controls Bange (1953)

21 Obtaining resistances (or conductances) Boundary layer conductance depends on wind speed, leaf size and diffusing gas Stomatal conductance is measured with a leaf porometer

22 Measuring stomatal conductance – 2 types of leaf porometer Dynamic - rate of change of vapor pressure in chamber attached to leaf Steady state - measure the vapor flux and gradient near a leaf

23 Dynamic porometer Seal small chamber to leaf surface Use pump and desiccant to dry air in chamber Measure the time required for the chamber humidity to rise some preset amount ΔC v = change in water vapor concentration Δt = change in time Stomatal conductance is proportional to:

24 Delta T dynamic diffusion porometer

25 Steady state porometer Clamp a chamber with a fixed diffusion path to the leaf surface Measure the vapor pressure at two locations in the diffusion path Compute stomatal conductance from the vapor pressure measurements and the known conductance of the diffusion path No pumps or desiccants

26 Steady state porometer leaf sensors Teflon filter R2R2 R1R1 h1h1 h2h2 atmosphere R vs = stomatal resistance to vapor flow

27 Decagon steady state porometer

28 Environmental effects on stomatal conductance: Light Stomata normally close in the dark The leaf clip of the porometer darkens the leaf, so stomata tend to close Leaves in shadow or shade normally have lower conductances than leaves in the sun Overcast days may have lower conductance than sunny days

29 Environmental effects on stomatal conductance: Temperature High and low temperature affects photosynthesis and therefore conductance Temperature differences between sensor and leaf affect all diffusion porometer readings. All can be compensated if leaf and sensor temperatures are known

30 Environmental effects on stomatal conductance: Humidity Stomatal conductance increases with humidity at the leaf surface Porometers that dry the air can decrease conductance Porometers that allow surface humidity to increase can increase conductance.

31 Environmental effects on stomatal conductance: CO 2 Increasing carbon dioxide concentration at the leaf surface decreases stomatal conductance. Photosynthesis cuvettes could alter conductance, but porometers likely would not Operator CO 2 could affect readings

32 What can I do with a porometer? Water use and water balance Use conductance with Ficks law to determine crop transpiration rate Develop crop cultivars for dry climates/salt affected soils Determine plant water stress in annual and perennial species Study effects of environmental conditions Schedule irrigation Optimize herbicide uptake Study uptake of ozone and other pollutants

33 Case study #2 Washington State University wheat Researchers using steady state porometer to create drought resistant wheat cultivars Evaluating physiological response to drought stress (stomatal closing) Selecting individuals with optimal response

34 Case study #3 Chitosan study Evaluation of effects of Chitosan on plant water use efficiency Chitosan induces stomatal closure Leaf porometer used to evaluate effectiveness 26 – 43% less water used while maintaining biomass production

35 Case Study 4: Stress in wine grapes

36 Indicator #3: Soil water potential Defines the supply part of the supply/demand function of water stress field capacity = MPa permanent wilting point -1.5 MPa We discussed how to measure soil water potential earlier

37 Applications of soil water potential Irrigation management Deficit irrigation Lower yield but higher quality fruit Wine grapes Fruit trees No water stress – optimal yield

38 Appendix: Lower limit water potentials Agronomic Crops

39 Summary Leaf water potential, stomatal conductance, and soil water potential can all be powerful tools to assess plant water status Knowledge of how plants are affected by water stress are important Ecosystem health Crop yield Produce quality

40 MethodMeasuresPrincipleRange (MPa)Precautions Tensiometer (liquid equilibration) soil matric potentialinternal suction balanced against matric potential through porous cup +0.1 to cavitates and must be refilled if minimum range is exceeded Pressure chamber (liquid equilibration) water potential of plant tissue (leaves) external pressure balanced against leaf water potential 0 to -6sometimes difficult to see endpoint; must have fresh from leaf; in situ soil psychrometer (vapor equilibration) matric plus osmotic potential in soil same as sample changer psychrometer 0 to -5same as sample changer psychrometer in situ leaf psychrometer (vapor equilibration) water potential of plant tissue (leaves) same as sample changer psychrometer 0 to -5same as sample changer; should be shaded from direct sun; must have good seal to leaf Dewpoint hygrometer (vapor equilibration) matric plus osmotic potential of soils, leaves, solutions, other materials measures h r of vapor equilibrated with sample. Uses Kelvin equation to get water potential -0.1 to -300laboratory instrument. Sensitive to changes in ambient room temperature. Heat dissipation (solid equilibration) matric potential of soilceramic thermal properties empirically related to matric potential to -30Needs individual calibration Electrical properties (solid equilibration) matric potential of soilceramic electrical properties empirically related to matric potential to -0.5Gypsum sensors dissolve with time. EC type sensors have large errors in salty soils Appendix: Water potential measurement technique matrix


Download ppt "Plant water relations Gaylon S. Campbell, Ph.D. Decagon Devices and Washington State University."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google