Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byBria Orr Modified over 2 years ago

1
Common Trend Models for Time Series Jee-Kwang Park Post-Doctoral Fellow in QuaSSI Department of Political Science Pennsylvania State University

2
2 Factor Analysis The object of interest is not directly observable (measurable) But other seemingly related quantities are measurable Factor analysis explain the correlations between measurable variables in terms of underlying factors, which are not directly measurable.

3
3 Factor Analysis Ex) Mathematical abilities among students

4
4 Common trend Models (Dynamic Factor Analysis) Estimate the underlying common trends among a group of time series. Do factor analysis with time series Estimate the factor loadings and predict factor scores Business cycle, interest rates, stock prices Three variants: DFA, TSFA, SSM

5
5 Common Trend Model Ex)

6
6 1) Dynamic Factor Analysis Geweke (1977) first proposes the dynamic factor analysis S-Plus/Finmetrics Program DFA estimates the dynamics of the factors Limit: valid with stationary series most social science data are nonstationary

7
7 Model Specification of DFA

8
8 Time Series Factor Analysis (TSFA) Gilbert and Meijer (2005) P-technique factor analysis (Cattell et al) works with nonstationary (weak bounded condition) MLE, estimate is unbiased and consistent Errors are not assumed to be iid R package (tsfa)

9
9 State Space Model of Common Trends (SSM) Engle and Watson(1981, 1983), Molenaar (1985), Harvey (1989), Lütkepohl(1991), Zuur (2003) Works with nonstationary and short time series can include explanatory variables most widely used Ox/STAMP

10
10 SSM Model Specification

11
11 Presidential Approval 6 series : Gallup, ABC/WP, CBS/NYT, Fox, Pew, Zogby Sources : www.pollingreport.com and roper center webpage Monthly Presidential Approval Series plural polls in a month, especially Gallup. Averaging the plural polls is not so a good idea. Cluster of polls, sample size

12
12

13
13 Presidential Approval Missing Data all polls but Gallup have missing months (Cubic) spline smooth interpolation (Zivot & Wang 2002) Spline ? nonparametric regression like Loess Gallup = 0, Fox = 1, CBS/NYT = 4, ABC/WP = 9, Pew = 9, Zogby =12 missing observations

14
14 Presidential Approval Previous Studies Beck, (2006), Franklin (2006), Chung(2006)… Franklin shows interesting findings on the house effects CBS polls tend to fall 3% below the overall trend in 2005- 2006: 38.2% 38.6% Robert Chungs finding : CBS polls have a small positive house effect during the pre-2005 period. Autocorrelation (serial correlation)

15
15 Franklin (2006)

16
16 Presidential Approval (DFA) Using Finmetrics (S-Plus) Wald test shows one common factor > factor.fit <- factanal(Bush.multiple, factors=1, method="mle") > factor.fit Sums of squares of loadings: Factor1 5.816041 … Test of the hypothesis that 1 factor is sufficient versus the alternative that more are required: The chi square statistic is 9.79 on 9 degrees of freedom. The p-value is 0.367

17
17 Presidential Approval (DFA) 97% of variance is explained by one common factor > summary(factor.fit) Importance of factors: Factor1 SS loadings 5.8160408 Proportion Var 0.9693401 Cumulative Var 0.9693401 Variance unique to each series The degrees of freedom for the model is 9. Uniquenesses: Gallup ABC/WP CBS Fox Pew Zogby 0.021 0.015 0.037 0.025 0.040 0.042

18
18 Presidential Approval (DFA) Correlation among the polls > fitted(factor.fit) Gallup ABC CBS Fox Pew Zogby Gallup 1.000 0.981 0.970 0.976 0.968 0.967 ABC 0.981 0.999 0.973 0.979 0.971 0.970 CBS 0.970 0.973 0.999 0.968 0.961 0.960 Fox 0.976 0.979 0.968 0.999 0.966 0.965 Pew 0.968 0.971 0.961 0.966 0.999 0.958 Zogby 0.967 0.970 0.960 0.965 0.958 0.999

19
19 Presidential Approval (SSM) The phenomenon conjectured by Franklin(2006) is supported by the residual plot The same phenomenon is also visible in other polls

20
20

21
21 Presidential Approval (SSM) Strength of SSM -We can compare a value in one series with one in another series due to following properties of SSM -55% approval rate in Gallup is tantamount to 56.226% in ABC/WP poll. -ABC =.775*Gallup + 13.601+ error

22
22 Tariff Rates (DFA) Tariff rates of 5 Latin American Countries Missing observations Two common factors 80 % of variance is explained by 2 factors

23
23

24
24

25
25

26
26 Average Tariff Rates (SSM) Two Common trends Brazil seems to be best explained by the two common factors Argentina is the worst fit, which means its tariff rates seem to be more influenced by domestic variables compared to the others. The series co-moved more tightly in the second half of the period.

27
27

28
28 Conclusion Common trends model will be useful - We have reason to believe multiple time series are influenced by the common factor(s) - The common factor cannot be directly measurable -We are interested in measuring the amount of the variances specific to each series -Another Application: asset returns model

Similar presentations

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google