Perfection at all costs? Did we get bogged down in making sure it was perfect? Special Collections Special Collections Special Collections Reference Strong Room Librarians want perfection – users want good enough Risking not seeing the wood for the trees
Customisation – Tread Carefully Primo is *very* flexible – lots of options
How was it used? 80/20 Theory 1.5 million Basic Searches 50,000 Advanced Searches 14 reviews written Several hundred items tagged
LibQual Survey November 2010 LibQUAL+® is a suite of services that libraries use to solicit, track, understand, and act upon users' opinions of service quality. Global; great for benchmarking
IC-1Making electronic resources accessible from my home or office IC-2A library website enabling me to locate information on my own IC-3The printed library materials I need for my work IC-4The electronic information resources I need IC-5Modern equipment that lets me easily access needed information IC-6Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to find things on my own IC-7Making information easily accessible for independent use IC-8Print and/or electronic journal collections I require for my work LibQual - Information Control Remit
minimumdesiredperceivedadequacysuperiority IC-1 Making electronic resources accessible from my home or officeOverall6.427.846.490.07-1.35 IC-2 A library website enabling me to locate information on my ownOverall6.538.006.49-0.03-1.51 LibQual - Information Control Remit Lets form a committee!!!
LibQual - Information Control Remit Polarised Feedback There was clearly a problem
What LibQual told us: We werent meeting our users minimum expectations of: A Library website enabling me to locate information on my own
Comments Analysis Navigation of the website is confusing The website is difficult to use The website is easy to use since the re- design Access to e-resources needs to be more user- friendly Online services are great! Off- campus access works very well VS
User Observation Study Real Users Real Tasks One user – One observer
We wanted to find out: where were users becoming confused user interface features that users didnt notice whether and when users logged-in to enhance search results additional features/on-screen guidance that might have benefitted users search experience Any issues affecting the success of the users search
Structure of observation Pre-observation interview Set list of tasks Think aloud: –Explain choices –Highlight anything thats confusing –Express pleasure or frustration –Explain how you would carry out a similar task in real life
Key Findings Most of the problems, frustration and confusion seemed to arise from our links to our discovery tools and once they navigated into them. Some users went to our webpage about books to find the book they wanted rather than using the search box!
Users tended not to notice the Get it and Online Access links and there was some confusion about what the wording meant
Sources of Confusion FRBRisation posed great difficulties and caused confusion –Primos preferred record had only unavailable items – short results showed only UNAVAILABLE –Available items on FRBRised records were hidden Journal article searching caused great confusion
Other findings Reliance on Google by all participants. Prior attendance at library training hugely improved the users success in completing the set tasks. Several undergraduates were confused about references – they were unsure what was a journal and what was a book
User Focus Groups Focus groups - for a wider perspective and to confirm findings Two groups – Undergrads; Postgrads & Staff Caution – those willing to attend tend to be more library- focussed, library-aware and therefore library-positive!
Primo-related findings Terminology used in online services is hard to understand – e.g. currently unavailable A simpler catalogue might be easier to use: –make it simple – more like Google One user with experience of other libraries was emphatic that our online services were significantly easier to use than elsewhere.
Other Improvements OPAC via Primo –Clearer account information –Clearer item/ holdings information
Not an easy journey! Planned for early summer go-live Fixing minor bugs resulted in much bigger problems! Upgrading to Aleph v.20 at the same time Eventually went live on the very first day of Semester Some ongoing issues
Feedback and Reaction Over-whelmingly positive: –the new catalogue is amazing! –I like the new look - design and layout - it mirrors the layout in many of our databases e.g., Ebsco, Proquest, Scopus. –it looks very good – easy to search and smooth integration with SFX and OPAC –an enjoyable and fruitful search experience –intuitive and intelligent layout and design
Final Thoughts Very valuable to ask users what they think Even more valuable to observe them using your discovery tools Primo v3 is a huge improvement on v2 and fulfills more of the promise Implementation can take a long time! Expect things to go wrong! School Institute Name to go here
Thank You! Ronán Kennedy email@example.com Monica Crump firstname.lastname@example.org School Institute Name to go here
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.