Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byElmer Beachley Modified over 3 years ago

1
Cloud Feedback Katinka Nov 7,2011 *Photo taken by Paquita Zuidema in Maldives

2
Feedbacks How to estimate feedbacks On cloud changes: Thermodynamics & Dynamics Outline:

3
Forcing vs. Feedback: Forcing = process external to the system Feedback = process internal to the system e.g.: CO 2 is an external forcing of climate change, but CO 2 internal variations have occurred naturally in past. In climate models:

4
RADIATIVE BALANCE AT TOA G = ext. forcing (e.g. CO 2, change in solar constant) G = G(R(T)) Transient radiative imbalance at TOA Radiative damping (i.e. feedbacks) Feedbacks:

5
When the system returns to equilibrium: Climate sensitivity parameter, i.e. FEEDBACKS(regulate radiative damping) Climate Sensitivity: Transient radiative imbalance at TOA

6
Climate Sensitivity: equilibrium change in global mean surface temperature ( T) that results from a specified change in radiative forcing ( G) +3.6 (T+lapse rate) -1.6 -0.4 -0.3 W m -2 K -1 + 4 W m -2 λ > 0 -> NEGATIVE feedback λ POSITIVE feedback

7
Computing Climate Sensitivity (i.e. ΔT) from models: Inverse method Forward method In: ΔT (+2K/-2K) AGCM (prescribed SST) Out: ΔR In: ΔR (2xCO 2 ) AOGCM Out: ΔT (Cess 88, Soden 04)

8
1.CRF (cloud forcing analysis) 2.PRP (partial radiative perturbation) 1.Radiative Kernels How to estimate feedbacks:

9
1. CRF (cloud forcing analysis) *Refs: Cess JGR90, Cess JGR96, Bony JC06 Water vapor+sfc albedo+Temp. (i.e. doesnt separate feedbacks) Change in radiative impact of clouds Major criticism: CRF can be negative, but cloud feedback positive, best e.g: *Bony JC06 Big upside: can be directly compared against observations (e.g. Bony GRL05)

10
2. PRP (partial radiative perturbation) *Refs: Soden et al JC08, Soden et al JC04, Wetherald and Manabe JAS 88 F=OLR Q=SW μ=geographical position, time of the day, time of the year Net TOA FLUX The total perturbation can be written in terms of the PRP (partial radiative perturbations): Feedback Parameter (for each variable X: w,T,c,a) offline Radiative Transfer Climate Model output

11
offline calculations, i.e. radiative response (only radiation code): The FB of each variable is estimated by changing only that variable in the radiation model and computing the resulting net perturbation at TOA -> all R(..) involve an offline radiative transfer simulation. Feedback Parameter (for each variable X: w,T,c,a) offline Radiative Transfer Climate Model output EXAMPLE (Soden JC04): Use inverse method, i.e. +/- 2 K exp. C B -> from B = + 2K, all others are from A = – 2K note: need 2 GCM simulations

12
Cloud FeedBack is calculated as a residual *Ref: Soden JC08 w B -> from B = + 2K, all others from A = – 2K 1.need 2 + 1 GCM simulations 2.R has to be run for each time step PRP: with decorrelation (primes) Radiative Kernel: 3. PRP evolves in Radiative Kernels: -> perturbation at each level: doesnt perturb correlations. Small compared to w B (t)-w A (t).

13
Water Vapor Feedback using Kernels Water Vapor Kernel (from RT code)Water Vapor Response to 2xCO2 (from GCM) x Water Vapor Feedback = Kernel x Response = *B.Soden

14
Cloud FeedBack is calculated as a residual *Ref: Soden JC08 Issue: Uncertainty in experiments with change in radiative forcing (e.g. CO 2 )… why not use CRF?

15
R.K. CRF Clouds mask other FB

16
W/m 2 /K/100 mb Total sky Clear sky Water vapor Kernel (zonal mean annual mean) What are the masking effect of clouds we need to correct for? *Soden JC08

17
Alternative to CF: Adjusted CRF *Ref: Soden JC08 dR at TOA can be written in two ways: CLOUD FEEDBACK: To be included in exp in which there are forcing changes Corrections to masking effects of clouds on other FB

18
*Soden JC08

19
References: Cess R.D. and G.L. Potter, 1988: A Methodology for Understanding and Intercomparing Atmospheric Climate Feedback Processes in General Circulation Models. J.Gehopys.Res. Cess R.D. et al., 1990: Intercomparison and interpretation of climate feedback processes in 19 atmospheric general circulation models. J. Geophys. Res. Cess R.D. et al., 1996: Cloud feedback in atmospheric general circulation models: An update. J.Geophys.Res. Soden B. et al. 2004: On the Use of Cloud Forcing to Estimate Cloud Feedback. Letters. J.Clim. Soden B. and I. Held, 2006: An Assessment of Climate Feedbacks in Coupled Ocean– Atmosphere Models. J.Clim. Soden B. et al. 2008: Quantifying Climate Feedbacks Using Radiative Kernels. J.Clim. Bony S. et al.,2006: How Well Do We Understand and Evaluate Climate Change Feedback Processes? Review article. J.Clim.

Similar presentations

OK

Shortwave and longwave radiative contributions to global warming under increasing CO 2 Aaron Donohoe – Applied Physics Lab, UW Kyle Armour, David Battisti,

Shortwave and longwave radiative contributions to global warming under increasing CO 2 Aaron Donohoe – Applied Physics Lab, UW Kyle Armour, David Battisti,

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on antiarrhythmic medications Ppt on index numbers in excel Ppt on traction rolling stock Ppt on hard gelatin capsules Ppt on allotropes of carbon free download Ppt on different solid figures powerpoint Ppt on importance of science and technology Ppt on new technology in electrical Water safety for kids ppt on batteries Ppt on alternative fuels for i.c engine