Presentation on theme: "COD Promotion Workshop"— Presentation transcript:
1COD Promotion Workshop Tenure TrackApril 2, 2014Presented by Luisa A. DiPietro,
2Outline Faculty Ranks and Tracks at COD Timelines and Process Documents – What and where?What’s in a dossier?What do I need to accomplish in order to be promoted?
3Faculty Ranks and Tracks at COD - 1 Clinical/EducationalSubtrack(AT-CT)ResearchSubtrack(AT-RT)Academic Track(Tenure Track)Titles(applicable to both tracks)InstructorAssistant ProfessorProbationary(pre-tenure)Associate ProfessorProfessorIndefinite tenure(tenured)
4Table of Tracks, Subtracks and Ranks within the College of Dentistry AcronymTenure statusFaculty Titles/RanksAcademic TrackAcademic Track – Research SubtrackAT-RTenure eligible /tenuredAssistant ProfessorAssociate ProfessorProfessorAcademic Track – Clinical/Educational SubtrackAT-CEClinical/Educational TrackN/ANT-CENon-tenureClinical InstructorClinical Assistant ProfessorClinical Associate ProfessorClinical ProfessorResearch TrackNT-RResearch Assistant ProfessorResearch Associate ProfessorResearch Professor
5Faculty Ranks and Tracks at COD - 2 Clinical Track(Non-tenure track)Research Track(Non-tenure track)TitlesTitlesClinical InstructorClinical Assistant ProfessorClinical Associate ProfessorClinical ProfessorResearch Assistant ProfessorResearch Associate ProfessorResearch Professor
7The Process of Promotion Department Head – Faculty DecisionPackage PreparationDepartmental Committee Review/VoteCollege Committee Review/VoteDean’s EndorsementUIC Campus Committee Review/VoteUIC Provost-Chancellor EndorsementPromotion!!!
8COD Timeline in detailMar- May DH identify faculty who will be nominated for promotion(Note: Probationary faculty in Year 5 must be nominated)June- July Nomination packages constructedAugust Departmental Review and Vote completedSeptember Completed packages submitted to CollegeOctober College Committee Review and VoteNovember Dean’s Review and EndorsementJanuary Finalized packages submitted to campus OFAFebruary Campus Committee MeetsFeb-Mar Faculty notified of Campus Committee VoteMay Provost-Chancellor decision announced
9Important things to note Your Department Head (DH) needs to make a firm decision about your nomination by May!The preparation of the nomination package will be a jointly shared activity that involves you, your Dept. Head, and generally the Asst. to the Head or another administrative assistant.As the “Preparer” the Dept. Head bears the final responsibility for the “case” (with one exception).Once the nomination package is submitted, you, as a candidate, are to be informed of each decision that occurs, every step of the way, in writing.The College of Dentistry Committee on Academic Track (CT/RT) Appointment, Promotion and Tenure consists of nine members, all Associate Prof. and above.Committee members can only vote on those to be promoted to their own rank or lower, but they may participate in the discussion of all nominations.
10What’s in the nomination package? The (dreaded) DossierDetails coming up!Letters of support from collaborators (required)Your DH will request these letters. Your DH may ask you for names of collaborators. Either external or internal are okay.Letters of support from others in the college/UIC (optional)Some DH like to include these, others do notExternal letters of referenceNo less than 5, no more than 8, solicited by your DH.Your DH will request these letters.The references must be unbiased, impartial experts in your field at the rank of full professor or equivalent.Cannot be past or present collaborators, mentors, or close associates.
11More about the external letters Candidates may submit a list of referees whom they believe are inappropriate along with the reasons for their proposed exclusion.Candidates are not allowed to submit a list of potential referees to the department .The request for an external reference letter must include:1) Standardized request letter – the DH prepares this.2) Your complete CV – be sure that it accurately and FULLY depicts your accomplishments.3) Your teaching, research, and/or service statements from the dossier.4) A statement of our college standards for the rank to which you are nominated.Optional: Some Department Heads also include representative publications.Discuss this with your DH early so you know what they want!Your DH may need these materials as early as May/June. Please check!Candidates are not permitted access to any part of the external letters of reference, even if redacted.
12The DossierInformation and Forms Available on the UIC Office of Faculty Affairs SiteA link is also available on the COD Faculty Affairs site.
13CAMPUS SITE FOR PROMOTION” “INFO AND DOSSIER FORMS
18What do I need to do in order to be promoted? College of Dentistry COMBINED GUIDELINES and NORMS:“CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES FOR APPOINTMENT, PROMOTION AND/OR TENURE OF FACULTY”Can be found on “Promotion and Tenure” page of the COD OFA website:SECTION I. IntroductionSECTION II. Academic RanksSECTION III. Faculty Tracks / Norms, Standards and Expectationsfor Academic RankQualifications expected for appointment and promotion at each rank(This section is sent to external reviewers to provide context for candidate’s activities.)SECTION IV. Documentation of QualificationsExamples of activitiesSECTION V. Procedures for Appointment and Promotion
19EXAMPLE: ACADEMIC TRACK – Research Subtrack Associate Professor (Academic Track – Research) with tenureA faculty member at this rank should have established a productive independent research program, should be contributing significant new information to the scientific literature, should show promise of becoming a leader in his/her field. This rank signifies a high level of professional accomplishment and a significant commitment by the faculty member to the College and University programs.Promotion to or appointment as an Associate Professor (Academic Track – Research) is recommended when the candidate has achieved the following norms:Continued growth in peer reviewed publications, which may include reviews and book chapters;A quality and quantity of published work that would be deemed adequate when reviewed by reasonable peers;Evidence of independent research funding, preferably from federal but also including non-federal sources, to support a nationally recognized research program; andDemonstrated evidence of excellence in educating students and/or activities directed at student learning.In addition, the candidate should have evidence of:Invited seminars at outside institutions;Participation in scientific meetings, both national and international;Supervision and mentoring of graduate or post-doctoral students;Participation in College and/or University governance;Active membership in appropriate professional organization(s);Service as a reviewer of manuscripts for peer-reviewed journals; andParticipation in service activities consistent with Departmental, College, and University missions.
20ACADEMIC TRACK – Research Subtrack FROM THE GUIDELINESAssociate Professor: Faculty at this rank should have established a vigorousindependent research program, should be contributing significant new information to thescientific literature, should show promise of becoming leaders in their fields, and shouldhave attained recognition at the national level. In addition, they should havedemonstrated a commitment to excellence in teaching and in service.
21EXAMPLE: ACADEMIC TRACK – Research Subtrack Promotion to ProfessorPromotion or appointment as a Professor (Academic Track – Research) is recommended when the candidate has added to previous achievements in each of the above-listed areas as described for Associate Professors (Academic Track – Research), above. Faculty at this rank must demonstrate continuing excellence in research and should have shown significant innovation in his/her work. The faculty member must have documented evidence of successful educational activity and service. Potential for future growth is also important. This rank signifies an extremely high level of professional accomplishment.In terms of reputation, the candidate should have become a leader in his/her field and should have attained national and/or international peer recognition, indicated, for example, by invitations to speak at national and international meetings. Candidates must continue to attract research funding, enhance graduate programs, mentor researchers, and be active in curriculum development. Candidates are expected to be active in faculty governance at College and University levels. Candidates are expected to be active in professional organization(s). Above all, candidates should have potential for continued professional growth, with the ability to guide junior faculty and others with whom the candidate interacts.
22ACADEMIC TRACK – Research Subtrack FROM THE GUIDELINESProfessor: Faculty at this rank should have demonstrated continuing excellence inteaching, research, and service and should have shown significant innovation in theirwork. They should be leaders in their fields and should have attained recognition atnational and international levels.
23EXAMPLE: ACADEMIC TRACK – Clinical/Educational Subtrack Associate Professor (Academic Track- Clinical/Educational)Faculty at this rank should have demonstrated evidence of excellence in educational activities and should be engaged in service and other scholarly activities. They should show promise of becoming leaders in their fields, and should have attained recognition at the state and/or national level.Promotion or appointment as Associate Professor with tenure is usually recommended when the candidate has achieved the following norms:Demonstrated evidence of excellence in educational, learner-centered activities;Development of educational materials and application of best education practices within the College curricula;Demonstrated excellence in the candidate’s field and promise of becoming a regional or national leader;A record of publication in peer reviewed journals, which may include reviews and book chapters;Evidence of a quality and quantity of published work that would be deemed adequate when reviewed by reasonable peers;Participation in faculty governance through membership on clinical/hospital/college and/or University committees;Participation in local, national and international professional meetings; andParticipation in service activities consistent with Departmental, College and University missions.In addition, it is expected that candidates will be involved in research and other scholarly pursuits at this stage; however the receipt of external research funding is not required for promotion in this rank. It is also expected that candidates who are clinicians, when appropriate for the candidate’s assigned role in the College, will have initiated the process of dental specialty board certification for a dental specialist. In lieu of board certification, general dentists must provide documentation of exceptional performance related to the identified norms. (For example, Diplomate of American Board in specialty, state specialty licensure, Academy of General Dentistry, American College of Dentists.)
24ACADEMIC TRACK – Clinical Educational Subtrack FROM THE GUIDELINESAssociate Professor: Faculty at this rank should have demonstrated evidence ofexcellence in teaching and should be engaged in service and other scholarly activities.They should show promise of becoming leaders in their fields, and should have attainedrecognition at the state and/or national level.
25EXAMPLE: ACADEMIC TRACK – Clinical/Educational Subtrack Promotion to Professor:Faculty at this rank should have demonstrated significant originality in their educational activities and should be engaged in service and scholarly activities. They should be leaders in their field and should have attained national and/or international peer recognition. This rank signifies an extremely high level of professional accomplishment.Promotion or appointment as a Professor is recommended when the candidate has added to previous achievements in each of the areas as described for Associate Professor. Potential for future growth is also important in the decision to make this appointment. The candidate should have become a leader in the candidate’s field and should have attained national and/or international peer recognition, indicated, for example, by invitations to speak at national and international meetings. The candidate should be involved in the governance of national or international professional organizations. It is also expected that candidates who are clinicians, when appropriate for the candidate’s assigned role in the College, will be board-certified if in a recognized specialty. In lieu of board certification general dentists must provide documentation of exceptional performance related to the identified norms or have an additional degree (for example a Master’s degree in an academic discipline).
26ACADEMIC TRACK – Clinical Educational Subtrack FROM THE GUIDELINESProfessor: Faculty at this rank should have demonstrated significant originality in theirteaching and should be engaged in service and scholarly activities. They should beleaders in their field and should have attained national and/or international peerrecognition.
27Research Assistant Professor (Non-Tenured Research Track) Normally, faculty at this rank will have participated actively for at least two years in the research programs of the College or will have had comparable research experience in another institution. Evidence of original research in the form of publications in refereed journals or in the awarding of grants should be demonstrated. Potential for excellence in research should be evident.Research Associate Professor (Non-Tenured Research Track)Faculty at this rank should have demonstrated sustained commitment to the research programs of the College. Faculty should be contributing significant new information to the scientific literature, should have shown the ability to successfully compete for research grants, and should have attained some recognition at the national level. Promotion would require that the candidate has achieved the following norms:Publication in peer reviewed or non-peer reviewed journals;Receipt of grant awards as principal investigator; andParticipation in local and national scientific meetings.Additionally, it is expected that the candidate will have participated in service activities consistent with Department, College, and University missions. The list is not intended to be all-inclusive or exclusive of other meaningful contributions. An individual may have contributed to only some of the itemized criteria and still be recommended for promotion. Ordinarily, promotion to this rank will require a minimum of five years of service at the Research Assistant Professor level. Appointment or promotion to Research Associate Professor requires clear documentation of excellence in research and national recognition.
28Also recommended reading, from the Criteria and Guidelines Document: SECTION IV. DEMONSTRATION OF QUALIFICATIONS
29EXAMPLE FROM SECTION IV. DEMONSTRATION OF QUALIFICATIONS B. TeachingThe categories to be used in judging teaching performance for all faculty members are listed below. Itis expected that those individuals who are being recommended for promotions primarily on the basisof excellence in teaching will be able to document excellence in these categories. Documentation ofteaching achievement includes:1. Student Performance. Objective measures, particularly external, of student progress in thecourses in which the candidate teaches provide evidence of teaching achievement.2. Systematic and Standardized Student Evaluation of Instruction. It is the responsibility of thedepartment head/chair or a departmental committee to obtain systematic and standardizedevaluation of teaching by students. Evaluations obtained via standardized program, College, orUniversity forms and procedures carry significantly greater weight than evaluations designed bythe candidate or others, although the latter will be considered. The results of standardizedevaluations will significantly influence decisions when the candidate is consistently judged bystudents to be at either extreme of the distribution of instructional effectiveness. In order to gaugean instructor's relative standing compared to colleagues in the department and in the College,normative comparisons are needed.3. Peer Appraisal of Instruction. Evaluation of teaching may be done by the department head orchair, discipline coordinator, or unit director. Also, faculty members from the same or similardisciplines may observe their colleagues in the multiple settings in which education occurs andshare their observations. Where appropriate these evaluations should specifically address aninstructor's ability to integrate his or her research to students, the appropriate level of difficulty ofmaterial presented, relevance of examples, integration of topics, structure of lecture, andcongruence between instructor goals and accomplishments. Peer evaluations of a facultymember's classroom behavior can be based on checklists, rating scales, or written appraisals.Observations by more than one colleague are recommended, since colleagues, quite naturally,rely on their own experience, values and definitions of effective teaching in making evaluations.4. Instructional Material. Evidence of innovative or creative contributions to teaching methods orcurriculum development, such as publications of educational materials, should be documented.Instructional materials can be evaluated by the colleagues. Ideally, the evaluation should beconducted by more than one colleague. Course materials can also be evaluated by askingstudents who have used them to complete a rating scale or open-ended questionnaire. Theimportance of innovation, as might be demonstrated by the creation of a new course, isrecognized.5. Teaching Responsibilities. A list of the candidate's specific teaching responsibilities, includingthe number of hours of direct instruction, provides valuable information about the candidate'scommitment to teaching. The teaching workload over a number of years indicates the scope ofactivity.6. Awards for Teaching Excellence. A list of awards received by the candidate for excellence inteaching provides another measure of the candidate's teaching ability.7. Continuing Dental Education. If the candidate has participated in the design or delivery ofcontinuing dental education programs, a list of such programs and the candidate's role anddocumentation concerning the quality of the candidate's contributions should be submitted.
302014 UIC Promotion and Tenure Seminars Office of Vice Provost for Faculty AffairsOverviews of Promotion and Tenure process and policies from the campus perspective. Panel of P&T Committee members for Q&A. Junior FacultyOverview of P&T process for Assistant Professors & Q Contract Faculty; appropriate for tenure and non-tenure track faculty.Friday, April 111:00 -2:25 PMStudent Center East, Room 603 UNDER-REPRESENTED FACULTYWorkshop and small group session focused on issues and questions specific to under-represented faculty; should be attended in conjunction with 4/11 seminar (and 5/2 workshop if applicable).Friday, April 181:30- 3:30 PM Post Mid-Probation, Pre-Tenure FacultyWorkshop for tenure track faculty in T3 or T4; should be attended in conjunction with 4/11 seminar.Friday, May 2Noon – 1PMUniversity Hall, Room 401
31YOU ARE NOT ALONE. OFA IS HERE TO HELP YOU ARE NOT ALONE! OFA IS HERE TO HELP! Wendy, Polly, Lu – Your team can be found in Room 401.