Presentation on theme: "Increasing ROI With Commercial-Scale Inverters Sponsored By:"— Presentation transcript:
Increasing ROI With Commercial-Scale Inverters
This webinar will be available afterwards at & via Q&A at the end of the presentation Hashtag for this webinar: #SolarWebinar Before We Start
Moderator Steven Bushong Solar Power World Presenters Scott Kolek Advanced Energy Jon Fiorelli Solectria
Opportunities for Increasing ROI of Commercial PV Inverters Scott Kolek – Product Manager - TX Inverters AE Solar Energy
Agenda Brief introduction to Advanced Energy Typical Large-scale Commercial PV Installation Technologies and Products for ROI Optimization Traditional New Emerging Conclusions and Takeaways
Advanced Energy Overview 30-year focus on power conversion solutions Founded in 1981 in Ft. Collins, Colorado 5 major sites: Fort Collins, Colorado; Bend, Oregon; Toronto, Ontario; Metzingen, Germany; and Shenzhen, China 1571 employees worldwide (as of May 2013) Dedicated service organization 2012 revenue $452M Ended 2012 with $172.2M in cash, having generated $110.8M of cash in 2012 Market capitalization $676.42M (as of May 13, 2013) Two business units AE Thin Films: Power conversion solutions for thin-film plasma manufacturing AE Solar Energy: PV inverters and energy management solutions Solid footing in growing solar inverter market Leadership in North America
AE Solar Energy Global Footprint
Transformer and transformerless PV inverters, integrated solutions, complementary BoS products, and O&M aimed at lowest cost of energy through project life-cycle Product Power Levels & Market Segments Integrated Solutions Power: 500 – 2MW Central Power: 35 – 500kW String Power: 12 – 24kW
Traditional Large-scale Commercial PV Installation Typical Characteristics Rooftop mounted, 600 VDC Strings ~12 panels/circuit DC Combiner Boxes Pad/Ground-mounted Central Inverters, ~100KW to 500KW range DC:AC Ratio on order :1 DC Sub combiners (fuses or breakers) integral to inverters Inverter-level and (sometimes) sub combiner monitoring 3MW Rooftop Solution, Ontario CA 250kW & 500KW Central Inverters 2.4MW Rooftop Solution, Portland OR 100kW & 260KW Central Inverters
Traditional Methods – ROI Improvement BoS Cost Reductions Structural system – optimized for streamlined installation Reduce install labor - pre-assembly, on-site assembly line, etc. Reduce O&M Costs – Reliability, increased uptime Wiring reduction methods (CPT, RPT) MV Applications: Multiple inverters 1 Step up transformer Increase Energy Harvest Increase panel performance Inverters lifetime = module lifetime Increased inverter reliability & uptime Increased inverter efficiency Trackers MPPT – Wider range, improved algorithms Use of modeling for design optimization
New Methods – Distributed/String Inverters ROI-Enhancing Benefits: Optimal match of power conversion capacity to array capacity – using smaller 15-24kW inverter blocks Eliminate DC Combiner Boxes (note: AC combiners still required) Reduced cost of (commodity) AC aggregation equipment versus low volume/high cost DC equipment Less mounting space. Compact size allows close- proximity mounting to array. No pad or rigging. Multiple MPPT Trackers on each roof offset shading & less-than-optimal array orientations Rapid field replacement serviceability Build-in monitoring capability for each inverter 100kW Rooftop Solution, Piscataway, NJ 20 & 24kW String Inverters
New Methods – High DC:AC Ratio Stringing ROI-Enhancing Benefits: Low (and lowering) cost of panels permit higher panel densities at small overall cost impact Utilize higher DC:AC Ratios to increase time at full power and increase Capacity Factor (Actual Energy / Max. Potential Energy) Achieve increased energy harvest in high temperature climates and less- than-optimal array mounting configurations CEC efficiency & MPPT less relevant in high DC:AC ration systems. DC:AC ratios :1 are available.
Emerging Methods – 1000V DC for Commercial UL-Listed installations are happening Utility, commercial ground mount and rooftop Many developers & EPCs going to 1kV DC Both central and string Projected to become mainstream solution for large commercial applications No NEC barriers, AHJ roadblocks clearing 1000 VDC on commercial rooftop and ground mount today with minimal challenges Ambiguity in code slowly being cleared up, acceptance accelerating 1000 VDC equipment selection growing Driven by growth of Utility segment Including modules, inverters, combiners, BOS
ROI-Enhancing Benefits: 20 modules per 1000 Vdc string vs. 12 per string at 600 Vdc in same location = ~40% less strings for same power, ~40% less combiner boxes, ~40% less home runs Conductor savings Amps cost $, volts are free : This is almost true, 1000 Vdc PV wire costs more that same gauge 600 Vdc wire, but it carries far more energy ~40% less conductor costs. Lower voltage drop losses Less losses from strings to combiners 1000V DC Commercial PV – The Upsides, Downsides Downsides: Requirement to meet >600V (multiple) sections code can complicate AHJ approval 1000V equipment availability still biased towards large scale utility applications (but changing…) Additional permitting and inspection hoops may offset benefits Short cable length & restrictive wiring applications may limit benefits Additional safety & training considerations for higher/1000V
Farther out – PV/Battery & Intelligent Microgrids Concept: Battery storage + PV array become dispatchable power supply asset Enterprise Controls intelligent dispatch generation sources + load controls to optimally-reduce energy costs Reduce size and usage of diesel gens for standby power. Reduce UPS. Participate in Energy Markets and sell excess electricity when prices high
How AE is Addressing the Challenges Continued Product Development 1000V Solutions Distributed/String solutions Forward-thinking R&D and Technology Partnerships SEGIS-AC and SEGIS: 4 years and counting Partnering with industry leaders to develop collaborative solutions: PGE, PEPCO, SAFT, NPPT, Sandia, NREL, etc 3+ year relationship with Schweitzer Engineering Lab (SEL) to advance technologies and products related to utility, facility, and PV system integration Closed-loop controls, advanced anti-islanding, reliability and stability, cyber-security Thinking beyond the Inverter PowerStation packaging, hybrid power system, energy storage, advanced inverter master controllers, etc.
Thank you for your attention! AE Solar Energy Headquarters Brinson Blvd Bend, OR Scott Kolek Product Manager – TX Inverters AE Solar Energy Office
Increasing ROI with Commercial Scale Inverters Jon Fiorelli Applications Engineer Solectria Renewables
There are dozens of design decisions Cost/Benefit Analysis Financial Model Keep in mind that there are many design decisions that are difficult to quantify There are very few Rules of Thumb Project Goals and Challenges Vary Financial Models Vary
String Sizing Use Max Allowable String Size to: Reduced BOS Costs (Fewer strings means fewer combiner boxes and fewer source and output circuits) Reduce System Losses (fewer circuits and higher voltage/lower total current) Maximize Production for System Life Ensures that max power voltage of the array will stay within the Max Power Point Tracking range of inverter as modules degrade during the lifetime of the system Of course, using max. number of modules is not always possible or preferred for other reasons (complex layout, odd string size, carport…) Next Stage in Design Evolution: 1000V Systems
String Sizing - Design Temperatures Consider using… ASHRAE Temperature (Extreme Annual Mean Minimum Design Dry Bulb Temperature) for larger max string size NEC (A) Informational Note Read: Array Voltage Considerations, B. Brooks, SolarPro Oct/Nov 2010 CHECK WITH INSPECTOR!! SolarABCs Map Tool reports/expedited-permit/map/
String Sizing Example Use Solectria PV System Builder (www.solren.com)www.solren.com Location: Atlantic City, NJ Array Size: 600kW DC Module: Sharp NU-U235F1 Inverter: PVI 500 Record Low/Average High -23°C/29°C 13 Modules Per String 196 Strings ASHRAE -16°C/33°C 14 Modules Per String 182 Strings THATS ONE LESS 14-STRING COMBINER!!
Oversizing Historically, designers oversize by 10% to 25% optimize kWh/kW (Specific Yield) -> High Module Prices Times have change: Cheaper Module Prices (More production for less incremental cost, same fixed cost) Time-of-Use Utility Rate structures Limiting factor is short circuit current Designers can vary tilt angle, power density, and encroach into shaded regions Definition of Best Ratio => Optimizes financial model (IRR, NPV, LCOE) Perform Oversizing Analysis using simulation program (PVsyst, PV*SOL, SAM) which feeds financial model
Other Design Decisions Inverter Location (longest run DC or AC?) Inverter Efficiency Module Specs: Efficiency, IP rating, Loading specs Module Tilt Angle/Orientation/Inter-row separation/Power Density Small vs. Large Combiner Boxes Copper vs. Aluminum Wiring
Inverter Integrated Options
Save field labor, equipment costs, and engineering/procurement overhead by having inverter options factory integrated. Examples: Subcombiners (Fuses, Breakers) Revenue Grade Meter Monitoring Gateway Card Zone Level Monitoring (troubleshooting value) Same company for inverter/monitoring (troubleshooting value)
Post Installation Considerations Means to Ensure UPTIME and Minimize DOWNTIME Perform Preventative Maintenance Inverter Provider Preventative Maintenance Plans Inverter Provider Uptime Guarantee Monitoring with Fault Notification Alerts Fault Action Plan (Installer, O&M Provider, Inverter Company) Spare Parts?? (Ground Fault Fuse, Subcombiner Fuses) Service and Maintenance Friendly Design (Site Plan Placards, Shade structure, Service receptacles)
Jon Fiorelli – Applications Engineer Dont forget that Application Engineers can help increase ROI: **Product Knowledge** **Project Experience** Thank You!
Questions ? Solar Power World Steven Bushong Phone: Solectria Jon Fiorelli Phone: Advanced Energy Scott Kolek Phone:
Thank You This webinar will be available at & Tweet with hashtag #SolarWebinar Connect with Facebook: …/SolarPowerWorld LinkedIn: Solar Power World Group Discuss this on EngineeringExchange.com