Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byἈριστόδημε Πανταζής Modified over 5 years ago
1
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages 2272-2278 (December 2016)
Incidence and predictors of right ventricular pacing-induced cardiomyopathy in patients with complete atrioventricular block and preserved left ventricular systolic function Erich L. Kiehl, MD, Tarek Makki, MD, Rahul Kumar, MD, Divya Gumber, MD, Deborah H. Kwon, MD, John W. Rickard, MD, FHRS, Mohamed Kanj, MD, FHRS, Oussama M. Wazni, MD, FHRS, Walid I. Saliba, MD, FHRS, Niraj Varma, MD, FHRS, Bruce L. Wilkoff, MD, FHRS, Daniel J. Cantillon, MD, FHRS Heart Rhythm Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016) DOI: /j.hrthm Copyright © 2016 Heart Rhythm Society Terms and Conditions
2
Figure 1 Patient flow diagram for the study population stratified by PICM, CRT upgrade, and CRT response. CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy; LVEF = ejection fraction; LVESV = left ventricular end-systolic volume; PICM = pacing-induced cardiomyopathy; PPM = permanent pacemaker. Heart Rhythm , DOI: ( /j.hrthm ) Copyright © 2016 Heart Rhythm Society Terms and Conditions
3
Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier curves depicting 15-year survival without LVEF decrease to ≤40% (PICM) for (A) the entire cohort, (B) cohort stratified by <40% or ≥40% RV pacing, and (C) cohort stratified by <20% or ≥20% RV pacing. LVEF = ejection fraction; PICM = pacing-induced cardiomyopathy; RV = right ventricular. Heart Rhythm , DOI: ( /j.hrthm ) Copyright © 2016 Heart Rhythm Society Terms and Conditions
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.