Presentation on theme: "GSA Maths Applied to Structural Analysis Stephen Hendry |"— Presentation transcript:
GSA Maths Applied to Structural Analysis Stephen Hendry |
Engineering problems are under-defined, there are many solutions, good, bad and indifferent. The art is to arrive at a good solution. This is a creative activity, involving imagination, intuition and deliberate choice. Ove Arup
CCTV - Beijing
Kurilpa Bridge - Brisbane
Design Process – The Idea Royal Ontario Museum - Toronto
Design Process – The Geometry
Design Process – The Analysis
Design Process – The Building
An Early Example In 1957 Jørn Utzon won the £5000 prize in a competition to design a new opera house
Sydney Opera House
One of the first structural projects to use a computer in the design process (1960s) Early application of matrix methods in structural engineering Limitations at the time meant that shells were too difficult Structure designed using simpler beam methods
Sydney Opera House
Structural analysis types Static analysis – need to know how a structure responds when loaded. Modal dynamic analysis – need to know the dynamic characteristics of a structure. Modal buckling analysis – need to know if the structure is stable under loading
Computers & Structural Analysis Two significant developments – Matrix methods in structural analysis (1930s) – Finite element analysis for solution of PDEs (1950s) Computers meant that these methods could become tools that could be used by engineers. Structural analysis software makes use of these allowing the engineer to model his structure & investigate its behaviour and characteristics.
Comparison of Static Solvers SolverSolution time (s) No. terms% non-zero terms Active column Sparse Parallel sparse nodes elements degrees of freedom
What is the Right Model Need to confidently capture the real response of the structure Oversimplification – Over-constrain the problem – Miss important behaviour Too much detail – Response gets lost in mass of results – More difficult to understand the behaviour
Emley Moor Mast Early model where dynamic effects were important – Modal analysis Model stripped down to a lumped mass – spring system (relatively easy in this case)
Emley Moor Mast
Over-constraining Modal analysis – restrained in y & z to reduce the problem size Helical structure – response dominated by torsion & restraint in y suppressed this
Graph Theory & Façades
Many structural models use beam elements connected at nodes. Graph theory allows us to consider these as edges and vertices. Use planar face traversal (BOOST library) to identify faces for façade.
Graph Theory & Façades Problem: graph theory sees the two graphs below as equivalent. The figure on the left is invalid for a façade… … so additional geometry checks are required to ensure that these situations are trapped.
Graph Theory & Façades
Current development work Model accuracy estimation – Structure – what error can we expect in the displacement calculation – Elements – what error can we expect in the force/stress calculation How can we run large models more efficiently
Model Accuracy – Structure
Model Accuracy - Structure
Model Accuracy – Elements
Domain Decomposition Method of splitting a large model into parts. Used particularly to solve large systems of equations on parallel machines.
Domain Decomposition For many problems in structural analysis the concept of domain decomposition is linked with repetitive units – Analyse subdomains (in parallel) – Assemble instances of subdomains into model – Analyse complete model Exploit both repetition & parallelism Substructure & FETI/FETI-DP methods
Substructuring & FETI methods Substructuring – parts are connected at boundaries. FETI (Finite Element Tearing & Interconnect) – parts are unconnected. Lagrange multipliers used to enforce connectivity. FETI-DP – parts are connected at corners and edge continuity is enforced by Lagrange multipliers.
A Historic Example – COMPAS
Split model into one repeating simple slices and … … a set of slices with ports Used PAFEC to do a substructuring analysis on Cray X-MP Historically substructuring was used to allow analysis of large models on small computers. Tokamak has repetition around doughnut
Substructuring Make it easy for the engineer! Use GSA to create component(s). In GSA master model – import component(s). Create parts – Instances of components – Defined by component + axis set Maintain a map between elements in assembly and elements in part/component.
Substructuring & Static Analysis
Substructuring & Modal Analysis Substructuring cannot be applied directly to modal analysis. Craig-Bampton method and component mode synthesis give an approximate method
Craig-Bampton Method For each substructure – Assume a fixed boundary – Select the number of modes required to represent the dynamic characteristics of this component The component can be represented in the assembly by – Boundary nodes and displacements – A matrix of modal mass and modal stiffness, with modal displacements as variables
Key Drivers Engineer – Understanding and optimising the behaviour/design of their structures – Need for more detail in the computer models Software developers – Problem size (see above) – Parallelism – making efficient use of multiple cores – Confidence in the results
Conclusions Modern structural analysis software depends on maths – which engineers may not understand in detail. Continual need for better/faster/more accurate methods to solve linear equations and eigenvalue problems. Dialogue between engineers and mathematicians can be mutually beneficial. Any novel ideas for us to make use of?