Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byTyler Allmond Modified over 2 years ago

1
GSA Maths Applied to Structural Analysis Stephen Hendry |

2
Engineering problems are under-defined, there are many solutions, good, bad and indifferent. The art is to arrive at a good solution. This is a creative activity, involving imagination, intuition and deliberate choice. Ove Arup

3
CCTV - Beijing

4
Kurilpa Bridge - Brisbane

5
Dragonfly Wing

6
Design Process – The Idea Royal Ontario Museum - Toronto

7
Design Process – The Geometry

8
Design Process – The Analysis

9
Design Process – The Building

10
An Early Example In 1957 Jørn Utzon won the £5000 prize in a competition to design a new opera house

11
Sydney Opera House

12
One of the first structural projects to use a computer in the design process (1960s) Early application of matrix methods in structural engineering Limitations at the time meant that shells were too difficult Structure designed using simpler beam methods

13
Sydney Opera House

14
Structural Analysis

15
Structural analysis types Static analysis – need to know how a structure responds when loaded. Modal dynamic analysis – need to know the dynamic characteristics of a structure. Modal buckling analysis – need to know if the structure is stable under loading

16
Computers & Structural Analysis Two significant developments – Matrix methods in structural analysis (1930s) – Finite element analysis for solution of PDEs (1950s) Computers meant that these methods could become tools that could be used by engineers. Structural analysis software makes use of these allowing the engineer to model his structure & investigate its behaviour and characteristics.

17
Static Analysis

18

19
Modal Dynamic Analysis

20
Modal Buckling Analysis

21
Aquatic Centre, Beijing © Gary Wong/Arup

22
Comparison of Static Solvers SolverSolution time (s) No. terms% non-zero terms Active column Sparse Parallel sparse nodes elements degrees of freedom

23
Modelling Issues

24
What is the Right Model Need to confidently capture the real response of the structure Oversimplification – Over-constrain the problem – Miss important behaviour Too much detail – Response gets lost in mass of results – More difficult to understand the behaviour

25
Emley Moor Mast Early model where dynamic effects were important – Modal analysis Model stripped down to a lumped mass – spring system (relatively easy in this case)

26
Emley Moor Mast

27
One-dimensional geometry

28
Over-constraining Modal analysis – restrained in y & z to reduce the problem size Helical structure – response dominated by torsion & restraint in y suppressed this

29
Graph Theory

30
Graph Theory & Façades

31
Many structural models use beam elements connected at nodes. Graph theory allows us to consider these as edges and vertices. Use planar face traversal (BOOST library) to identify faces for façade.

32
Graph Theory & Façades Problem: graph theory sees the two graphs below as equivalent. The figure on the left is invalid for a façade… … so additional geometry checks are required to ensure that these situations are trapped.

33
Graph Theory & Façades

34
Current Developments

35
Current development work Model accuracy estimation – Structure – what error can we expect in the displacement calculation – Elements – what error can we expect in the force/stress calculation How can we run large models more efficiently

36
Solution Accuracy

37
Model Accuracy – Structure

38

39
Model Accuracy - Structure

40
Model Accuracy – Elements

41

42
Solver Enhancements

43
Domain Decomposition Method of splitting a large model into parts. Used particularly to solve large systems of equations on parallel machines.

44
Domain Decomposition For many problems in structural analysis the concept of domain decomposition is linked with repetitive units – Analyse subdomains (in parallel) – Assemble instances of subdomains into model – Analyse complete model Exploit both repetition & parallelism Substructure & FETI/FETI-DP methods

45
Substructuring & FETI methods Substructuring – parts are connected at boundaries. FETI (Finite Element Tearing & Interconnect) – parts are unconnected. Lagrange multipliers used to enforce connectivity. FETI-DP – parts are connected at corners and edge continuity is enforced by Lagrange multipliers.

46
A Historic Example – COMPAS

47
Split model into one repeating simple slices and … … a set of slices with ports Used PAFEC to do a substructuring analysis on Cray X-MP Historically substructuring was used to allow analysis of large models on small computers. Tokamak has repetition around doughnut

48
Substructure Identification

49
Substructuring Make it easy for the engineer! Use GSA to create component(s). In GSA master model – import component(s). Create parts – Instances of components – Defined by component + axis set Maintain a map between elements in assembly and elements in part/component.

50
Substructuring & Static Analysis

51

52
Substructuring & Modal Analysis Substructuring cannot be applied directly to modal analysis. Craig-Bampton method and component mode synthesis give an approximate method

53
Craig-Bampton Method For each substructure – Assume a fixed boundary – Select the number of modes required to represent the dynamic characteristics of this component The component can be represented in the assembly by – Boundary nodes and displacements – A matrix of modal mass and modal stiffness, with modal displacements as variables

54
Craig-Bampton Method

55
Key Drivers Engineer – Understanding and optimising the behaviour/design of their structures – Need for more detail in the computer models Software developers – Problem size (see above) – Parallelism – making efficient use of multiple cores – Confidence in the results

56
Conclusions Modern structural analysis software depends on maths – which engineers may not understand in detail. Continual need for better/faster/more accurate methods to solve linear equations and eigenvalue problems. Dialogue between engineers and mathematicians can be mutually beneficial. Any novel ideas for us to make use of?

57

Similar presentations

© 2016 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google