Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ"— Presentation transcript:

1 Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ
11/20/2018May 2008 November 2007 doc.: IEEE /2752r1 2018/11/20 Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ Date: Authors: Jun Li, Thomson Inc.. Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

2 11/20/2018May 2008 November 2007 doc.: IEEE /2752r1 2018/11/20 Abstract One of the goals of VTS is to enable link layer adaptation on differentiated frames in a video stream according to channel conditions. This requires an intra-flow/intra-AC differentiated service (intra-Flow DiffServ), which is not supported in e QoS amendments. This proposal discusses the requirements on link layer intra-flow DiffServ and presents solutions accordingly. Jun Li, Thomson Inc.. Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

3 Outlines Why we need intra-flow/intra-AC DiffServ? Approach
11/20/2018May 2008 November 2007 doc.: IEEE /2752r1 2018/11/20 Outlines Why we need intra-flow/intra-AC DiffServ? Approach Possible Differentiation Fields Solution 1: Modify QoS control field Solution 2: Add a 2-byte new field before Frame body Compatibility to e Management frame modifications for supporting intra-flow DiffServ Jun Li, Thomson Inc.. Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

4 Why we need intra-flow/intra-AC DiffServ?
2018/11/20 Why we need intra-flow/intra-AC DiffServ? VTS PAR scope proposed the following MAC enhancement Graceful degradation of audio video streams when there is insufficient channel capacity, by enabling packet discarding without any requirement for deep packet inspection. Intra-Access Category prioritization of transport streams by modifying EDCA timing and parameter selection without any requirement for deep packet inspection. Improved link reliability and low jitter characteristics for multicast/broadcast audio video streams Differentiated frames have different importance in a video transport stream, e.g., Video content dependent MAC frames, e.g. SVC base layer or enhance layer; I,P,B frames in MPEG-2 or H.264 Region of interest based encoding Channel coding frames, e.g. FEC and/or ARQ Jun Li, Thomson Inc..

5 2018/11/20 Approach Basic idea: define new information fields in MAC frame to realize frame differentiation without requiring deep frame inspection. Information required: VTS flag For distinguishing the VTS MAC frames against legacy frames VTS stream identification (VTS-SID) For a pair of source and destination addresses, multiple streams may be served. Need to differentiate one stream from another, so that intra-flow (aka. intra-stream) differentiation can be done for each stream In case of intra-AC (Access Category of EDCA), VTS-SID may not be required VTS stream intra-flow differentiation fields Used for frame differentiation within one video flow, e.g., I,P,B frames in MPEG-2 video flow; video, audio, FEC packets in one video flow Provide the frame dropping criteria when there is insufficient channel capacity Jun Li, Thomson Inc..

6 Possible Differentiation Fields
2018/11/20 Possible Differentiation Fields Priority Corresponding to content dependent frames for intra-flow or intra-AC Dropping precedence How to drop Frame category Video/Audio FEC Jun Li, Thomson Inc..

7 Solution 1: Modify QoS control field
2018/11/20 Solution 1: Modify QoS control field Applicable frame (sub) types Bits 0–3 Bit 4 Bits 5-6 Bit 7 Bits 8–15 QoS (+)CF-Poll frames sent by HC TID EOSP Ack Policy Reserved TXOP Limit QoS Data, QoS Null, and QoS Data+CF-Ack frames sent by HC QAP PS Buffer State 1(VTS flag) Intra-flow/Intra-AC information QoS data frames sent by non-AP QSTAs TXOP Duration Requested 1 Queue Size 1 (VTS flag) The TID subfield (4 bits) identifies the TC or TS to which the corresponding MSDU, or fragment thereof, in the Frame Body field belongs. The EOSP subfield (1 bit) is used by the HC to indicate the end of the current service period (SP). The Ack Policy subfield (2 bits) identifies the acknowledgement policy. 00=normal Ack, 10=No Ack, 01= No explicit acknowledgment. 11= Block Ack Bit 7 flag indicates it is a VTS frame with intra-flow/ intra-Access Category (AC) information included. When the flag is set, intra-flow/intra-Access Category field is contained in bits When the flag is not set, other information is contained in bits 8-15. Jun Li, Thomson Inc..

8 Example 1: Intra-AC only (solution 1 Contd.)
2018/11/20 Example 1: Intra-AC only (solution 1 Contd.) Drop Precedence Intra-AC Priority Reserved intra-flow/intra-AC information B8 B10 B11 B12 B15 B13 B14 Frame category TID= 0-7 B0-B3 Intra-AC Priority subfield (2 bits) indicates the priority of the frame in the access category. Drop precedence subfield (2 bits) indicates how the frame is dropped. B12B13 = 00: no special action, 01: drop if necessary, 10: drop all if necessary, 11: reserved Frame category (1 bit) indicates if the frame is an FEC frame if it is set to 1. (We may want to combine it with Drop precedence to give more choices.) Reserved (3 bits), however, in case of frame is “QoS Data, QoS Null, and QoS Data+CF-Ack frames sent by HC” , B9 (buffer status indicator in QAP PS buffer status field should) set to 0. Avoid confusion for non-VTS devices. Jun Li, Thomson Inc..

9 Example 2: Intra-Flow DiffServ (solution 1 Contd.)
2018/11/20 Example 2: Intra-Flow DiffServ (solution 1 Contd.) B0-B3 B8 B10 B11 B12 B13 B14 B15 TID= 8-15 Reserved Frame category Drop Precedence Intra-Flow Priority intra-flow/intra-AC information TS Info TSPEC element Bits: B0 B7 B8 B9 B11 B13 B18 B21 B22 B23 Access policy = 01 UP Reserved TS Info field When TID = 8-15, it can be directly used as VTS-SID. A TSPEC management frame must be used to specify parameters of the stream. In this case, a VTS frame needs to make sure Access policy = 01 (EDCA) and UP (user priority) = AC (access category), in order to compatible with EDCA. Jun Li, Thomson Inc..

10 Solution 2: Add a 2-type new field before Frame body
2018/11/20 Solution 2: Add a 2-type new field before Frame body Frame Control Octets:2 2 Address 1 Duration/ ID Address 2 Address 3 Sequence control 6 Address 4 QoS Control VTS control information Frame Body 2302 FCS 4 VTS control B0-B3 B4 B10 B11 B12 B13 B14 B15 Drop Precedence Intra-Flow Priority TID Frame category Reserved intra-flow/intra-AC information A 2-byte field, VTS control field, is defined and added before the frame body in the data frame. Priority, Dropping criteria, Frame category fields are defined as same as in solution 1. TID = 0-7, intra-AC only, TID = 8-15, intra-flow. The bit 7 in QoS control field (see the following figure) shall be set to 1, based on which the VTS MAC frame can be distinguished by a VTS station. TID Bits: B0 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B8 B15 VTS Flag =1 B11 B12 QoS control field in MAC frame Jun Li, Thomson Inc..

11 Compatibility to 802.11e No need for HCCA
2018/11/20 Compatibility to e No need for HCCA Intra-flow/ intra-AC priority is not required due to per flow QoS is already specified by HCCA. Backward compatibility to EDCA VTS devices can process EDCA frames produced by legacy devices. If all EDCA functions are supported, it is fully compatible. Forward compatibility to EDCA Legacy e device can process VTS frames as normal EDCA frames. However, a frame generated by VTS device may not contain information of QAP PS buffer status, a possible optional function for EDCA Solution 1 is backward & forward compatible, solution 2 is backward compatible only. Jun Li, Thomson Inc..

12 Management frame modifications for supporting intra-flow DiffServ
2018/11/20 Management frame modifications for supporting intra-flow DiffServ Following management frames need to be modified Beacon frame Association request / Reassociation request Association response / Reassociation response Following information elements / fields contained in the above frames need to be extended QoS capability information element QoS info field Jun Li, Thomson Inc..

13 2018/11/20 Straw Poll 1 Do you think solution 1 in document 0529/r1 a favorable solution of graceful degradation and intra-access category prioritization for TGaa (further refinement may be required) ? Yes No Jun Li, Thomson Inc..

14 2018/11/20 Straw Poll 2 Do you think solution 2 in document 0529/r1 a favorable solution of graceful degradation and intra-access category prioritization for TGaa (further refinement may be required) ? Yes No Jun Li, Thomson Inc..


Download ppt "Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google