Presentation on theme: "2014 WORK PROGRAM LRE KICKOFF"— Presentation transcript:
12014 WORK PROGRAM LRE KICKOFF WORK PROGRAM AND FINAL PLANSMarch 13, 2014
2Work Program State of the Work Program Work Program Cycle Overview FY TWP DevelopmentRoll ForwardUnexecuted Supplemental AgreementsProject SequencingFY 2015 Realignment
3Revenue vs. Commitment Impacts Time FrameRevenue ImpactCommitment ImpactFiscal Year 2006/07($372) M($564) MFiscal Year 2007/08($2,117) M($3,284) MFiscal Year 2008/09($3,871) M($5,628) MFiscal Year 2009/10($25) M($505) MFiscal Year 2010/11($729) M($716) MFiscal Year 2011/12($1,282) M($1,006) MFiscal Year 2012/13$113 M $1,277 M Fiscal Year 2013/14:August 2013($14) M($16) MAugust 2013 (GM)$239 M$358 MSeptember 2013 – Increased Allocation$0 M$1,200 MDecember 2013$196 M$297 MDecember 2013 (GM)$109 M$139 MTotal($7,753) M($8,448) M
4Work Program Cycle Overview JANUARY, 2014Central Office TWP ReviewsMARCH, 2014Work Program/LRE Kick-off meetingLRE system opens for project updatingProcess begins for new TWP for 2016 – 2020Evaluate BridgesConduct pavement condition survey for RRREstablish multimodal candidatesDevelop Traffic Operations and Safety projectsRevenue Estimating ConferenceAPRIL, 2014PM commit to project letting months (Lockdown of FY 2015, 2016 and 2017)
6Work Program Cycle Overview (cont’d.) May 5 thru 7, 2014Work Program Realignment: Update FY2015 LREs in FM(LREs due to FP on April 18)JUNE, 2014PM Work Program Review meetings beginAll LREs due to Work Program
7Work Program Cycle Overview (cont’d.) JULY, 2014Secretary adopts the FY Work ProgramGaming Opens for FYComplete PM Work Program Review meetingsRun Variance Report for MPO/TPOsOCTOBER, 2014MPO Priorities due to FDOTNOVEMBER – DECEMBER, 2014Present the TWP to the Public and MPOsSchedules are discovered and adjustedPMs meet with the Transportation Development Director to commit to letting datesJANUARY, 2014Gaming closes for the FY TWP
10Roll Forward Overview What is roll forward? Project phases programmed in current year that will not be encumbered/committed by the beginning of June.…new agreements, supplementals, row landReasons for project roll forward include:Agreements not executed prior to the beginning of JuneRight-of-way land not purchasedBid rejections/protests on PSU/CSU projects not allowing for encumbrance by the end of JuneContingency being maintained for:Estimate increasesSupplemental agreementsCost overrunsClaims & litigationFuel & Bituminous Adjustments, etc.
12Unexecuted Supplemental Agreements What is it?A report identifying Supplemental Agreements/Work Orders that have been encumbered however, the agreements have not yet been executed in FLAIR (Status 10).This is a tool to assist you in ensuring Supplemental Agreements/ Work Orders are executed in a timely manner.Agreements must be executed by early June to avoid having the encumbrance cancelled at year end.Agreements not executed by early June, will be un-encumber and must be re-encumbered the following Fiscal Year.Affects both budget and roll forward.
13Unexecuted Supplemental Agreements The Report is Aged to indicate how long the SA’s have been encumbered but not fully executed.Less than 30 days30-60 days60-90 daysdaysOver 120 days
18Project SequencingA sequence is the last two digits of the 11 digit FMi.e.,
19Project Sequencing cont’d. Needed forLocal FundsMore than 1 program number on an phase52-01: Roadway (program 02)52-02: Bridge Replacement (program 03)52-02: Bridge Rehabilitation (program 04)52-03: Resurfacing (program 05)52-04: Safety (program 06)
20Project Sequencing cont’d. Needs to be separated in the LRERequires separation and entry of pay items by sequenceAssists in the close-out process
21FY 2015 RealignmentRealignment of Construction and R/W Estimates during May 5 thru 72nd Year OpportunityTIP/STIPs may be warrantedProcessing up to 3 months
22FY 2015 Realignment TIP/STIP Amendment Threshold Project adjustments exceed $2M and 20%Adding new federalized project phasesAdvancing a federally funded phase(from outside the 4 year window)Major change in scope and/or project limitsProject deletions
23Remember… Adhere to all Tentative Work Program development datesLRE due datesProject Manager Work Program review datesRequest new projects or changes to existing projects through the Work Program Change Request system
252014 LRE KICKOFF FINAL PLANS Presented by Nadir Rodrigues and Mark Madgar
26Final Plans LRE Guidelines Submittal Process Project Unknowns The New Timeline
27Who to call for System Access issues? LRE versus Trns*port IntroductionWho to call for System Access issues?LRE versus Trns*portItems to VerifyLandscapingRemindersSummary
282. Who to Call for System Access issues? CONTACT OIS:For the creation, deletion or modification of a Security Profile.For a revoked and/ or expired User-ID.For a revoked and/ or expired Password.For transferring an account from district to district.
29Who to Contact for System Access issue CONTACT the FDOT Project Manager:When a user needs to be created in the LRE System only. TRNS*PORT access is provided by Tallahassee.When a user needs to be added or removed from Projects and/or Versions.When a user needs to be re-assigned from one Project or Version to another.PROJECT MANAGER WILL CONTACT FINAL PLANS
303. LRE versus Trns*port LRE Trns*port The primary tool used to produce budget estimates for the 5-Yr Work Program.Is used before final design quantities are available.Is typically used from the PD&E phase to the Biddability phase.Trns*portIs used for the Plans, Specs and Estimates package and Bidding Proposal.Normally be used after the Biddability Phase.If your project is either a Lump Sum or Design Build, you will need to load the itemized pay items into a secondary TRNS*PORT. The TRNS*PORT will be created as either xxxxxx-x-52-0xLS or xxxxxx-x-52-0xDB respectively.Note: If your project is near the transition into the Biddability Phase, the PM should use the estimate (LRE or Trns*port) which reflects the current approved scope and project cost at the time of Submittal.
314. Items to VerifyThe project information in the LRE Header shall match the FM System, i.e.- Project Manager, Letting Date, Project Length, etc. If different, check with Work Program to correct.The LRE or Trns*port shall not contain Obsolete Pay Items.
32Items to Verify - continued For projects that contain multiple Sequences and/ or Programs in FM, a separate sequence in the LRE shall be used to reflect each one. There are many Program Types, but the most common to keep a look out for are: 02- Roadway, 03 – Bridge Replacement, 04 – Bridge Rehabilitation, 05 – Resurfacing, 06 – Safety and 29 – Rail. Multiple Sequences: Multiple Sequences & Programs:
33Items to Verify - continued TIP/ STIP - Last Minute Cost Adjustments:If project is Federally Funded.If project cost increases in excess of $2 Million and 20%, a TIP/ STIP needs to be processed.It may take 3 months or longer to process which may cause the project to miss the letting.
34Items to Verify - continued Use of EX-Items.-Use only when a pay item does not exist for an activity.-Do not enter as a Lump Sum, Per/ Mile cost or Design Fees for DB.-If trying to use for an already used X-Item, include the quantity in the existing X-Item and describe both quantities in the “Comment Field”.
35Items to Verify - continued Asphalt Contingencies correctly entered:-Calculate Asphalt Contingencies as SP=10% & FC=5%.-Load contingencies into each Sequence that contains asphalt and use the comment field to describe.Do not include additional contingencies for items such as:-Earthwork-Wetland Mitigation-Contamination, etc.Use the proper percentages:-MOB shall be 8%.-MOT shall be 10%.-Partnering: include if project duration > 1yr or project cost > $2 Million.(Use 2 $3,000/ DA)-Disputes Review Board: include if project cost > $15 Million.(Use 1DA / Month for duration of project)
36Items to Verify – continued If project is a Design Build, the LRE shall show the project as a Design Build, and the Design Fees shall not be included in a component of the LRE.The Design Build % is a range that is chosen by the DOT PM.
375. Landscaping Requirements & Implementation effective 7/1/2013: All Landscaping projects will be set up as Stand-Alone projects separate from the Roadway Construction project except for the following scenarios.The Landscaping Cost < $100,000 or 10% of the Construction Cost, whichever is lower.The Landscaping is for the purpose of Screening.The Landscaping is a component of a Local Agency (LAP) construction project.The Landscaping is a component of a project off the State Highway System but not a LAP project.If one of the above scenarios is met, the Landscaping will be loaded into the LRE/ TRNS*PORT as usual using the current methods of payment found in the BOE, Estimates Bulletins and Specifications.
38Landscaping – cont.Two types of Landscaping projects: Dependant, Stand-Alone Landscaping Project: -Associated with a Roadway Construction project. -Programmed in the year that the Roadway Construction project is anticipated for completion. Independent, Stand-Alone Landscaping Project: -Not associated with a Roadway Construction project. -Programmed in the year that the Landscaping project is ready for production. The FDOT PM will need to coordinate with both the District Landscape Architect and Work Program to make sure that the project not only complies with both the Department Environmental and Highway Beautification Policies, but also complies with the funding guidelines as well. (E & O Memo 13-1: Knowledge Base> Prgm Management)
406. Reminders Copying a LRE Version: Allows the PM or consultant to continue to prepare the project, or prepare multiple alternatives, for its scheduled phase submittals outside of the Work Program Cycle.
41Reminders – continuedRun the “Obsolete Pay Item Report” to check for obsolete items in the LRE.Select “Estimates” tab; then “Reports” tab; then “R33”.
42Reminders - continuedUse the “Find and Replace” function to help in replacing obsolete pay items in the LRE.Select “Replace”; Find pay item with Asterisk (*); Find new pay item in drop-down; Reset to Default Price; Click “Save”.
43Reminders - continuedRun the “Project Edit Report” to check for obsolete items in the Trns*port.
44Reminders - continued “Rejection Rule”: A LRE may be rejected if the difference in scope of the LRE and Scope History is greater than $50,000 or greater than 1% of the total construction cost. (Larger of the two applies)**The Project LRE and Project Scope History shall match.**
457. SummaryFor new accounts or re-setting existing accounts, have the FDOT PM contact OIS to correct any security profile issues. FDOT PM to contact Final Plans for project specific access.Most data errors we see relate to inconsistencies between the LRE and the Project Scope History.Remember to use separate sequences when appropriate.Minimize the use of EX-Items.Refer to the LRE Guidelines for the proper contingency values, and do not add miscellaneous contingencies to your project.(Knowledge Base>Prgm Mngt>Final Plans>Estimates)Refer to the LRE Guidelines for the proper values for MOT, MOB and Non-Bid Pay Items.Remember to check the Knowledge Base to see how you should be handling the Landscaping Construction.(Knowledge Base>Prgm Mngt>Engineering & Operations Memo 13-1)
46Summary - continuedRemember to correctly identify in the LRE whether your project is a Design Build project.Use the special features, “Copy Version”, “Obsolete Pay Item Report”, “Find & Replace” and “Project Edit Report” to simplify your work.Remember to use the LRE Checklist.(Knowledge Base>Prog Mgt>FP>Estimates>LRE Checklist)If you have any questions pertaining to the LRE reviews, please contact one of the following people:Mark J. Madgar x4613Ali Rastagh x4413Luis Barrios x4329Raul Andujar x4691Nadir Rodrigues x4385
47LRE Submittals What LREs to submit LRE status Submitting an LRE New Requirements
48What projects need an LRE submittal LRE Submittal Checklist, Report and Statuses
49LRE Submittal Overview How to SubmitHard Copy Submittals
50Hard Copy Requirements to Submit LRE Checklist – Completed (found on Knowledge Base & Final Plans Website.)LRE R3 Report of Primary Version.Approved Scope.Risk Summary & Register (only if including Project Risk).The above items need to be submitted to Graham Oliver in Final Plans.
52Why Project Cost Risks? Why not keep the old way? A way to quantitatively determine project unknowns – requires justification.
53Are we trying to reduce unknown $ amounts? The objective is not to reduce the unknown dollar amounts, but justify why we need them.
54What your unknowns could have built Recent projects$100 million w/ 20% unknown – do you know what you can build with that?SR 70 – 6 miles of complete 4 lane divided highway reconstruction and canal construction. ($17 million)I-95 – 4 miles of 4 to 8 lane reconstruction, interchange improvements, and 2 bridges widened. ($18 million)US-1 – Replace 4 bridges ($11.6 million)I miles of additional lanes, interchange improvements, bridge widening and noise walls. ($12 million)
56Project Unknowns/Contingencies Funded & Unfunded ProjectsProject Unknown % Factor in LRE not usedEX-Item labeled “Project Risks/Unknowns” usedExact dollar value entered, no percent factor.-Risk Summary & Register (Backup)Spreadsheet found on Knowledge BaseProgram Management -> Final Plans -> Estimates“Guide to Including Project Risks/Unknowns in LRE”
58Completing Risk Register Identify RisksDetermine probability of each risk occurring (Guidance given in spreadsheet.)Threat or Opportunity?Calculate minimum dollar impactCalculate maximum dollar impactCalculate most likely dollar impact
59How to Calculate $ value for Risks Designer determines quantities$ value = Quantity X Unit PriceDetermining Unit PriceOption 1 – Find value at State Estimates historical cost website.Option 2 – Ask Final Plans(Mark Madgar / Ali Rastagh)
60Jose Theiler and Tim Brock are also available for any mentoring through this process and if a training class is necessary please contact them (the Risk Team)
61Finding Historical Cost on Website 1st Choice – Find 12 month moving Area (11 & 12) Average for pay item.2nd Choice – Find annual statewide average for pay item.
63Identified Risk ≠ Major Scope Unknowns (According to Final Plans) Major scope unknown = Separate LREMost likely scope/LRE submittedExample: PD&E Alternate AlignmentsSeparate LRE means separate version of the LRE, not a separate FPID number.
64Quantity Calculations = No Fluff Example 1:In the pastNot sure if we’re putting down 2” or 3” of asphalt. It’s probably 2”, but I’m going to account for 3” just so we don’t go over budget.NowAccount for 2” of asphalt in the LRE since that is the most likely scenario.An extra 1” of asphalt will be considered in the project risk.
65Quantity Calculations = No Fluff Example 2:In the pastNot sure of the exact earthwork quantities because you have yet to get a survey, so you overestimate to the worse case scenario.NowYou put the most likely scenario in your LRE. You then include as a risk what the quantity would be in a worse case OR best case scenario.
66Removing Risks/Unknowns Example 2 continued:- The following year survey is complete and cross sections doneRisk comes off of the risk register since the earthwork amount is now known.Quantity in LRE is updated with the known quantity.
67Quantity Calculations = No Fluff Example 3:In the pastYou’re pretty sure there’s muck on the job, because you have soil borings from a previous job in the area, but don’t know how much, so your LRE shows muck removal throughout the entire project limits.NowYou put the most likely scenario in your LRE. You then include as a risk what the quantity would be in a worse case OR best case scenario.
68Removing Risks/Unknowns Example 3 continuedThe following year you order soil borings throughout the project limits.Risk comes off of the risk register since the limits of muck is now known.If you are still unsure of the exact limits, you could keep the item as a risk, but it would be modified to reflect what you do know.Quantity in LRE is updated with the known quantities.
69What about Asphalt Contingencies? Include asphalt contingencies per the current LRE Guidelines if project is not a streamline contract.Do not include Asphalt contingency if project is a streamline project.
70Any project that meets both of the following criteria: Streamline ProjectAny project that meets both of the following criteria:Contains less than 2,000 tons of total asphalt.Total project cost is less than $2 million Present Day Cost (PDC).Streamline projects – All pay items become plan quantity. (No field adjustments allowed.)
71Where to load Project Risks/ Unknowns? EX-Item loaded into sequence 1 of the LRE labeled:“Project Risks/Unknowns”- Enter the value from the Risk Register in the EX-Item.
72How can I get more information? Knowledge Base“Guide to Including Project Risks/Unknowns in LRE”Location: Program Management->Final Plans-> EstimatesAlso for reference - This presentation!“2014 Work Program/LRE Kickoff Presentation”Location: Root directory of Knowledge Base
73LRE Due Dates – 2014/2015 Update Year Adopted ( ) April 18FY April 25FY May 2FY May 16FY May 30Unfunded/Others June 13FY June 13