We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byReagan Erickson
Modified over 2 years ago
©2009 Dowlatabadi Geoengineering Hadi Dowlatabadi January
©2009 Dowlatabadi 2 Overview What is the challenge? What are our options? What is geoengineering? Whats next?
©2009 Dowlatabadi 3 Have you Noticed Climate Change Related to Global Warming? Globe & Mail 27/01/2007
©2009 Dowlatabadi 4 Is Global Warming Occurring Due to Human Activity? Globe & Mail 27/01/2007
©2009 Dowlatabadi 5 Are Consumers or Industry to Blame for Most Carbon Emissions? Globe & Mail 27/01/2007
©2009 Dowlatabadi 6 Are Greenhouse Gases the Same Issue as Smog? Globe & Mail 27/01/2007
©2009 Dowlatabadi 7 Can Global Warming Be Solved? Globe & Mail 27/01/2007
©2009 Dowlatabadi 8 Outcomes Intervention CC Completely Solved 12% CC Partially Solved 70% Not Solved at all 15% Dont Know & no answer 3% MitigationEmissions & other forcing factors > 2 GtC eq /yr e.g., Kyoto: ~ 5% reduction in CC by 2050 Adaptationto reduce impacts from remaining ~95% CC residual CC impacts not solvable by adaptation GeoengineeringIff some adverse effects of CC are less tolerable...
©2009 Dowlatabadi 9 Human Activities & Geoengineering Outcome Extraction of Services Modify the Earth System Acts Agricultureintentional unintentional Fossil energyintentional unintentional Hydro damsintentional unintentional Wind powerintentionalunintentional Geogengineeringintentional
©2009 Dowlatabadi 10 Impacting the Earth System Unintended impacts have been large enough to change climate. –Those who hold fast that climate change is mostly natural believe human activity is on too small a scale (compared to nature) to have brought about global change. The potential to impact is determined by the rate of extraction cf. rate of renewal –fresh water... –wind power...
©2009 Dowlatabadi 11 A Short History of Intentional GeoEngineering 1905 virtue of CO 2 emissions warming the earth, extending agriculture pole-wards and increasing food production. –Russia 1932 the Soviet Union took climate modification seriously, experimenting with cloud seeding USSR conducts an experiment that cleared away clouds from a 20,000 km 2 area. –They were seeking to destroy arctic ice cover. –US 1957 worry about strategic advantage of USSR. 1960s well funded programs focus on weather modification started extensive cloud seeding in VIetnam –International 1972 convention against military modification of environment.
©2009 Dowlatabadi 12 Intolerable? Antigua and Barbuda Marshall Islands Bahamas Mauritius Barbados Nauru Belize Niue Cape Verde Palau Comoros Papua New Guinea Cook Islands Samoa Cuba Singapore Cyprus Seychelles Dominica Sao Tome and Principe Dominican Republic Solomon Islands Fiji St. Kitts and Nevis Federated States of Micronesia St. Lucia Grenada St. Vincent and the Grenadines Guinea-Bissau Suriname Guyana Tonga Haiti Trinidad and Tobago Jamaica Tuvalu Kiribati Vanuatu Maldives Palau Kiribati Nauru Florida Keys
©2009 Dowlatabadi 13 Florida +6m Sea Level Rise
©2009 Dowlatabadi 14 Unimaginable? The Trinity test was conducted while there were doubts about the potential for an A-bomb to set off an atmospheric chain reaction. Image courtesy of US Govt. Defence Threat Reduction Agency
©2009 Dowlatabadi 15 Geoengineering Options Change balance of solar radiation –in space –in the upper atmosphere –by surface modification Change carbon release to the atmosphere –through sequestration of captured CO2 Change carbon uptake (... life of other GHGs) –in oceans and land through modified ecosystems
©2009 Dowlatabadi 16 Blinds in Space At L1, the angle of scatter needs to be ~ 0.01 rad ~3x10 3 t mass
©2009 Dowlatabadi 17 Sails in Orbit source: In earth orbit, the angle of scatter needs to be ~ 1 rad ~3x10 5 t
©2009 Dowlatabadi 18 More Persistent Clouds source:
©2009 Dowlatabadi 19 Modelling Results Gavindasamy & Caldeira (2000, GRL) modelled a 1.8% reduction in solar constant. –In 2xCO 2 run 97% of surface temperatures were significantly different to control. –In 2xCO 2 +Geoengineering, 15% of pixels on earth had significantly different temperature and seasonal patterns were not different to control. Budyko (1950s) –~10 7 tSO 2 in stratosphere counters 2xCO 2 forcing. –Jet travel in 2005 led to 250MtC of CO 2 emissions. If we use 2% S fuel dispersal will be free.
©2009 Dowlatabadi 20 Teller et al t of metallic mesh-structure particles enough to increase albedo by 1%. If made of Aluminium they would have long shiny life in stratosphere but oxidise in troposphere. Thickness of wires is determined by optical depth in metal (20 nm) and mesh spacing has to be 1/2 the wavelength of scattered light we plan to scatter (300 nm). Not cheaper than sulphur in jet fuel, but far lower in inadvertent impacts.
©2009 Dowlatabadi 21 Ocean Fertilisation source:
©2009 Dowlatabadi 22 Pump It Down Redfield studies molar ratio of elements making up living tissue. was identified by Redfield –C:N:Si:P found consistently in the ratio of 106:16:15:1 Much of ocean N-limited, and many N-fixers are limited by availability of Fe. –C:Fe = 10,000:1 IronEx I, II, III in the 90s led to a commercial venture that aims to increase fish production and cash in on the GHG offset market. –I cant find any of the papers or data on these any more!
©2009 Dowlatabadi 23 Lock It Up Geologic weathering provides the material for normal sequestration of CO 2. CO 2 has an exothermic reaction with serpentine rocks (MgSiO 3 ). In principal, power-plants can separate CO 2 and react it with serpentine. The volume of material needed is similar to the volume of fossil fuels being consumed. –This is a very costly option both in economics and in disturbance to the environment. d_Pictures/SouthCoast/0304_Serpentine.jpg
©2009 Dowlatabadi 24 Geoengineering Energy BalanceEnergy Transport Short Wave Albedo Long Wave Emissivity Ocean Atmosphere & Surface Goals space & atmospheric scatterers surface albedo uptake of CO 2 and conversion of other GHGs. changing ocean salinity/turnover changing: rate of evaporation Surface roughness Means aerosols deforestation build surfaces afforestation GMO enhanced photosynthesis OH - for CH 4, O + for N 2 O large dams (Gibraltar) OTEC iceberg transport surface treatments wind turbines Cost ~50 B - ~300B to offset 2xCO 2 x10~100??
©2009 Dowlatabadi 25 More than Climate is Changing We are changing: –atmospheric composition, chemistry & physics –ocean chemistry and circulation –surface albedo and roughness If we want to reduce impacts, we should consider efforts that look beyond reducing forcing and reduce change in composition of the atmosphere.
©2009 Dowlatabadi 26 CO 2 Capture: Sleipner, Norway $FILE/sleipner.jpg $FILE/sleipner.jpg
©2009 Dowlatabadi 27 No Black Magic in Amine Process
©2009 Dowlatabadi 28 Below The Waves
©2009 Dowlatabadi 29 CO 2 Injection Enhanced oil recovery using CO 2 injection has been used for 3 decades.
©2009 Dowlatabadi 30 Even in Florida
©2009 Dowlatabadi 31 CO 2 Reservoirs & Leaks!
©2009 Dowlatabadi 32 Reservoir Sizes Geological –Depleted oil and gas reservoirs: GtC –Deep saline aquifers: GtC –Deep coal beds: GtC –Chemical reaction with Silicate rocks. Oceanic –Capacity is large: ~ GtC; depending on the acceptable degree of acidification. –Atmosphere-ocean carbon equilibrium: ~80% in ~300 years.
©2009 Dowlatabadi 33 Renewables: Biomass Average power use in more industrial countries: –5kW/cap. Range of energy capture in terrestrial systems: – Wm 2 Area needed to meet all needs for average person: –0.5 hectare/capita = 1/2 of (croplands + forests)
©2009 Dowlatabadi 34 ¢/kWh tCO 2 /Gj Electricity: GHG vs. Cost
©2009 Dowlatabadi 35 Cost to Intervene Geoengineering Mitigation CSS % Climate Change Averted Cost
©2009 Dowlatabadi 36 Cost of Mitigation Option$/tCRisk Stratospheric SO 2 <<1 Atmospheric chemistry Solar Shields Does not address other impacts of CO 2 increase Ocean: Iron1-10 Is Fe really limiting?can this be a long-term solutions? Ocean: Phosphate3-10 Oxygen depletion, ecological shift, long term capture questionable Intensive forestry Biodiversity and soils. CO 2 in ground Low CO 2 in ocean Moderate uncertainty about fate
©2009 Dowlatabadi 37 Policy A shot-gun marriage between: –the available AND –the imperative
©2009 Dowlatabadi 38
©2009 Dowlatabadi 39 Earth of tomorrow?
1 Air Pollutants and Global Climate Hsin Chu Professor Dept. of Environmental Engineering National Cheng Kung University.
Things to Ponder 1.Why are polar bears often used to illustrate climate change? 2.What is the atmosphere? 3.What are the primary layers of the atmosphere?
The role of carbon sequestration in reducing atmospheric CO 2 Alicia Evans-Imbert.
Climate change and pollution Eleanor J Highwood Department of Meteorology, University of Reading MSc Intelligent Buildings April 2002.
1 Climate Change Policies: Roles of Developing Countries Anil Markandya Bath University December 10, 2006.
1 Keith Tovey ( ) Н.К.Тови M.A., PhD, CEng, MICE, CEnv Energy Science Director: Low Carbon Innovation Centre School of Environmental Sciences, UEA. Rotary.
1.1 Module 1 Introduction to Mitigation Under the UNFCCC a.The science of climate change. b.Definition and scope of mitigation c.Contributions of IPCC.
1 Prof. Ali Al-Karaghouli Consultant for the United Nations Environmental Program For West Asia (UNEP/ROWA)
© Vattenfall AB Launching of the second European Climate Change Programme (ECCP II) Lars Strömberg Vattenfall AB Stockholm/Berlin Stakeholder Conference.
CLIMATE CHANGE – EFFECTS AND RESPONSES (NIGERIAS PERSPECTIVE) By Dr. Amechi. J. Ujam Being A Paper presented at the 2010 End of Year Get- Together of.
Microalgae farming and beyond: Biologically Assisted Carbon Capture from Energy and Industrial Operations Ramon Sanchez. Harvard University March 1, 2011.
WBCSD, November 2004 Energy and climate change Facts and Trends to 2050.
1 Optimizing Geoengineering schemes for CO 2 Capture from Air Putting together ideas from: Klaus LACKNER, David KEITH, Dan ZASLAVSKY, Rami GUETA, John.
Greenhouse gases, global warming and the ozone layer ATMOSPHERE AND CLIMATE.
The Atmosphere, Climate and Global Warming. Climate Change Central Questions & Key Concepts What is the atmosphere What is the difference between weather.
Global Warming ClassAct SRS enabled. In this presentation you will: Discover what Global Warming is and investigate some of the causes and effects.
CST Review Standard 4 Energy enters the Earth system primarily as solar radiation and eventually escapes as heat. a.Know the relative amount of incoming.
Presentation downloadable from 1 John Harrison B.Sc. B.Ec. FCPA TecEco Managing Director The Solution to Global Warming is to Change the.
Presentation downloadable from 1 John Harrison B.Sc. B.Ec. FCPA TecEco Managing Director Facing the Sustainability Challenge Seminar 11.
CS 755: CLIMATE, AGRICULTURE AND ENVIRONMENT BY REV. PROF. MENSAH BONSU.
Presentation downloadable from 1 Sustainability Workshop – Hobart 1 st May, 2008.
3.1 Mitigation Assessment: Concepts, Structure and Steps CGE TRAINING MATERIALS- MITIGATION ASSESSMENT MODULE C.
Science and Technology for Sustainable Well-Being John P. Holdren Director, The Woods Hole Research Center Teresa & John Heinz Professor of Environmental.
Presentation downloadable from 1 Pervious Pavement We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
Environmental Chemistry Option. E1.1 - Pollution Pollution refers to changes in the equilibrium (or balance) of biological and non-biological systems,
ESC GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE Chapter 3. The Greenhouse Effect Part-2.
1 Sources of energy. Fossil fuels. What is the alternative? Where do we get energy from?
The Climate System and Global Warming. Weather and Climate Basics Weather: Day to day variations in the earth’s atmosphere. Ex: Climate: Generalized weather.
Presentation downloadable from 1 TecEco – Kyoto Opportunities I will have to race over some slides but the presentation is always downloadable.
© 2016 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.