1. Prospective Validation of the Objective Prognostic Score for Advanced Cancer Patients in Diverse Palliative Settings 
Hyun Jung Jho, MD, Sang-Yeon Suh, MD, MPH, PhD, Seok-Joon Yoon, MD, Sanghee Shiny Lee, BS, Hong-Yup Ahn, PhD, Takashi Yamaguchi, MD, PhD, Masanori Mori, MD, Isseki Maeda, MD, PhD, Mika Baba, MD, PhD, Tatsuya Morita, MD 
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (September 2016)
DOI: /j.jpainsymman
Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Terms and Conditions

2. Fig. 1
Flow of data extraction from original data for Objective Prognostic Score validation. HPC = home-based palliative care; NA = not available; PCT = palliative care team; PCU = palliative care unit.
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management  , DOI: ( /j.jpainsymman )
Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Terms and Conditions

3. Fig. 2
Survival curves grouped by Objective Prognostic Score 3 as cutoff. Log-rank tests showed significant difference in survival (P < 0.001) between participants with OPS ≥ 3 and OPS < 3 in all three palliative care settings. HPC = home-based palliative care; OPS = Objective Prognostic Score; PCT = palliative care team; PCU = palliative care unit.
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management  , DOI: ( /j.jpainsymman )
Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Terms and Conditions

4. Fig. 3
ROC curves of Objective Prognostic Score for predicting three-week survival. Subjects were confined to whose death were confirmed during study period. AUC = area under the curve; HPC = home-based palliative care; ROC = receiver operating characteristic; PCT = palliative care team; PCU = palliative care unit.
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management  , DOI: ( /j.jpainsymman )
Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Terms and Conditions