Presentation on theme: "Can Markets for Health Insurance Work? Jonathan Levin Gaston Eyskens Lectures November 2013."— Presentation transcript:
Can Markets for Health Insurance Work? Jonathan Levin Gaston Eyskens Lectures November 2013
Roadmap Lectures 1.Technology and Asymmetric Information 2.High Risk Consumer Credit Markets 3.Measuring Inefficiencies from Adverse Selection 4.Can Markets for Health Insurance Work?
Introduction Arrow (1960): healthcare as an industry where traditional notions of competition and efficiency are problematic. Why? Uncertainty and asymmetric information. – Needs are concentrated => must have insurance – Potential for adverse selection in insurance – Moral hazard for insured individuals – Physicians asymmetrically informed about care How well can markets for health insurance work? Should there be a major role for private market competition in a national healthcare system?
Private Market Solutions Of developed countries, US has perhaps the most privatized healthcare / health insurance system. It also has the most expensive system. Source: OECD
What Role for Markets? Major debate in the United States, where healthcare is 18 percent of GDP, and 21 percent of federal budget. Medicare (over 65) – Private market insurance now offered as a substitute for government insurance. Republicans propose to shift entirely to premium support. Obama Health Insurance Reform (under 65) – Attempts to provide universal coverage by mandating the purchase of (subsidized) insurance, and establishing state insurance exchanges. Some parallel debates in European countries.
Outline of Lecture Describe research with Jay Bhattacharya, Vilsa Curto, Liran Einav on Medicares experiment with managed competition. Motivation: current structure of US Medicare program is opportunity to compare two public / private systems operating head-to-head, fixing the population and set of healthcare providers. Outline of lecture – Medicare and managed competition – Risk selection – Imperfect competition – Market design Caveat: work in progress….
Background on US Medicare Program Medicare program is government provided health insurance for all those over 65, plus disabled, ESRD, etc. – Individuals pay modest ($100) monthly premium. – Insurance covers hospital and outpatient services. – Privatized drug coverage introduced in 2006. Traditional fee for service insurance (FFS) – Beneficiaries can use any doctor or hospital that accepts Medicare. Most do. Medicare reimburses for services. – Price for each service is set administratively, plus there are a complex set of hospital / facility subsidies.
Concerns about Medicare Widely viewed as very inefficient – Why? Low copayments + physician incentives to do more => overuse of services. No constraints on spending / utilization. – Many documented distortions due to administrative pricing, e.g. bias towards procedures, specialists. Striking geographic variation in costs – Medicare spends $13,824 to provide healthcare to someone in McAllen, TX, versus $7,766 in Rochester. – Common interpretation: indicates wide scope to provide different services, and lack of cost-efficient standards of care.
Medicare Advantage Program US introduced private plans in 1985: beneficiaries could opt out of traditional insurance, and enroll in a private insurance plan. Approved plans receive annual payment for each enrollee, initially 95% of local FFS costs, and updated periodically. Hope was that private plans would allow consumer flexibility, save taxpayer dollars, and preserve quality. But there were problems … Low take-up – less than 15% of beneficiaries as of 2003 Evidence of significant risk selection (cream-skimming) Projected cost savings were not realized
Managed Competition In 2003, new legislation introduced competitive bidding. – Attempt to avoid setting administrative capitation rates. – Risk adjustment added to address selection. Based on proposals that date back to the 1970s. Some similarities to proposed state exchanges. Risk adjustment developed between 2003-2006. Every Medicare beneficiary scored based on disease history. Regression model used to map diseases into predicted cost.
Questions Selection – Do private plans manage to select relatively healthy enrollees? Is risk-adjustment successful in addressing this? Competition – Is bidding competitive? Do bids reflect underlying costs, or does the program create substantial insurer rents? Further questions about quality, innovation, cost growth, efficacy of consumer choices, etc..
Selection: enrollment by risk score High risk beneficiaries are less likely to enroll in private plans.
Selection: conditional on risk score Mortality notably lower among new MA enrollees.
Disease Classification Incentives Private plans are more aggressive in coding diseases.
Adjusting for Selection & Up-coding For each private plan enrollee, we observe plans bid and payment, and can impute an FFS cost based on county and risk score. Up-coding and selection adjustments (still somewhat ad hoc): – Disease classification: MA risk scores higher by 2-5% (?) – Selection: based on mortality + lagged MA costs => 1-4% (?) Avg. across MA enrollees As fraction of imputed FFS Imputed FFS Cost$ 9,021100 Private Plan Adj. Bids$ 8,33692.4 Private Plan Payment$ 9,311103.2 Adjusted FFS Costs- 91-97
Competition and Market Concentration Medicare Advantage market is highly concentrated Fraction of counties where market share is > 90%> 85%> 75% Top two insurers 0.260.400.66 Top three insurers 0.590.750.94 We need to take imperfect competition seriously.
Medicare Advantage Rules Country divided into local markets (3,034 counties). Medicare sets benchmark rate B for each county. Plans bid to provide standard insurance for a standard individual. Individuals choose a plan in their market, or standard Medicare. B b CMS pays plan B Enrollee pays b-B $ b CMS pays plan b Enrollee pays 0 c Plan Cost Benchmark And CMS pays plan a rebate ¾*(B-b) that it passes to consumer in as higher benefits.
Market Design: Benchmarks County benchmarks are main design parameter If bids track benchmark, then lower B means lower margins. – However, entry is also responsive to market benchmarks. Back of envelope calculation. A $100 decrease in benchmark: directly decreases bids by $50 but maybe plans would exit?
Choosing Benchmarks County benchmarks are main design parameter If bids track benchmark, then lower B means lower margins. – However, entry is also responsive to market benchmarks. Back of envelope calculation. A $100 decrease in benchmark: directly decreases bids by $50 – induces exit of 3.5 plans, which increases bids, but by < $5 Based on our estimates (including margins of > $100 per month per enrollee) desirable to reduce benchmarks. We are about to try this under Obamacare.
Prospects for Competition Die or Exit Sample Switch MA/TM Stay MA/TM Stay with Insurer MA Enrollees4.48%4.57%90.95%81.40% TM Enrollees5.72%1.89%92.39%- Are private plans competing with each other, or the government? MA/TM enrollment transitions, 2006-2010 In markets with low private plan penetration, traditional government insurance is the primary competition. (Note: choices also are pretty persistent … switching costs?)
Public Option as Constraint Option to use TM appears to be an important constraint on plan bids, especially in areas with low penetration / few plans. Interestingly, the Obamacare reform does not include a public option for insurance, although some lobbied for it. One hypothesis is that private plan competition may not work all that well in low entry (likely rural) markets.
Conclusions US is engaging in a huge national experiment with managed competition provision of health insurance. Ongoing Medicare private plan program has grown rapidly, but at what appears to be fairly significant cost to taxpayers. There do appear to be potential cost savings; the question is whether it is possible to realize them. We have started to look a few possible mechanisms, but project is still at a fairly early stage…