Presentation on theme: "Web-based Class Project on Ground Improvement"— Presentation transcript:
1Web-based Class Project on Ground Improvement VibroflotationPrepared by:Yanet ZepedaIan McCreeryReport prepared as part of courseCEE 542: Soil and Site ImprovementWinter 2014 SemesterInstructor: Professor Dimitrios ZekkosDepartment of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of MichiganWith the Support of:
4IntroductionVibroflotation utilizes horizontal vibrations in conjunction with fluid to reduce the interparticle friction of the surrounding soil.
5Introduction During vibration material falls into a denser state. Result: Increase in strength and a reduction in compressibility.Densification of soil during vibroflotation (Bauer Maschinen GmbH, 2012)
6Introduction Uses: Reduce potential settlement Seismic liquefaction mitigationCommon for:Off-shore projectsLand made of reclaimed soilHydraulic fills
7ApplicabilityMost coarse-grained soils with a fines content of less than 10% are considered acceptable.Ideally, loose soils below the water table.
8Applicability Problem with Cohesive Soils: Fills voids between larger particles and immobilizes the material due to positive pore water pressures; this inhibits the ability of the granules to move into a denser state.
9ApplicabilityThe orange area represents the grain size distribution of soils suitable for vibroflotation (Bauer Maschinen GmbH, 2012)
10Equipment Composed of vibroflot and follow-up pipe Capabilities vary by manufacturerAbout 12 feet in total lengthWeigh about 10,000 to 20,000 lbs
11Equipment Electric or hydraulically powered motor to rotate a mass Centrifugal force generated: 43,000 to 70,000 lbs2 JetsBottomUpper
12Construction Procedures Reach depths up to 150 feetDensification achieved 5 to 15 radially from vibroflot
13Construction Procedures VF trialSoil penetrationDensification at desired depthRetract probe to next locationBackfill
18Case Study: SuccessSeabird Naval Base at Karwar in Indian state of Karnataka.Construction of 3 mile long breakwater structure.Project Seabird (Sharma, 2004)
19Case Study: SuccessExisting seabed was composed of clay and soft silt, it was dredged to a depth of nearly 20 feet with hydraulic sand fill.Problem:CPT’s revealed need for compaction of top 13 feet to reduce settlement and mitigate liquefaction
20Case Study: Success 35 acres selected for compaction Four 49 foot long vibrators suspended from a crane situated on a bargeProject Seabird setup (Raju et al., 2003)
21Case Study: Success Results & Conclusion: CPTs performed every 164 feet along the breakwater structure. The 13 feet of compacted fill achieved a twofold to threefold increase in penetration resistance compared to the uncompacted values.Vibro flotation densified the hydraulic fill beneath the breakwater structure successfully.
22Case Study: Failure Thermalito Afterbay in Northern California 8 mile long embankment, 39 foot height
23Case Study: FailureAugust of 1975 an earthquake of magnitude 5.7 revealed an active fault that had not been previously detected.Department of Water Resources evaluated the embankments resistance to liquefaction under a 6.5 magnitude earthquake.
24Case Study: FailureAnalysis predicted that the silty sand layers in the foundation of the embankment would liquefy entirely under these seismic conditions.Densification of these silty sand layers was necessary to mitigate liquefaction risks.
25Case Study: FailureFoundation made of layers of different soils including clay, silt, sand and gravel.Surface layer throughout most of the embankment was composed of a clay and silt layer several feet thick.Silty sand layers contain a median of 15 percent fines, with 30 percent of the samples containing more than 20 percent fines
26Case Study: Failure Vibroflotation testing program implemented Thermalito Bay worksites table (Harder et. al., 1984)
27Case Study: FailureVibroflot was not used to penetrate the clay and silt surface layer, here pre-drilling was used until silty sand layer reached then holes were backfilled before vibroflot was inserted.An equilateral triangular spacing scheme was utilized with spacings ranging from 6.5 feet to 9.5 feet.
28Case Study: Failure Results for Worksite 2. No appreciable improvement.Same for Worksite 1.Thermalito Bay CPT and SPT results (Harder et. al., 1984)
29Case Study: Failure Conclusion: Vibroflotation is not an effective method for the densification of silty sands below a cohesive soil cap.The failure of vibroflotation as a technique in this case is most likely due to the relatively high fines content of 15 percent in the silty sand layer.
30ConclusionsVibroflotation is a successful and cost effective technique used to densify loose coarse-grained soils