Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byJoey Silvers Modified over 3 years ago

1
Relations between reflection and transmission responses of 3-D inhomogeneous media Kees Wapenaar Department of Applied Earth Sciences Centre for Technical Geoscience Delft University of Technology Dallas SEG 2003 October 29

2
Claerbout, 1968 SEG, 2002 Acoustic daylight imaging Berkhout, 1982 Multiple elimination Imaging from below Schuster, 2001 Seismic interferometry Herman, 1992 Wapenaar, 1993 True amplitude imaging

3
Claerbout, 1968 SEG, 2002 Acoustic daylight imaging Berkhout, 1982 Multiple elimination Imaging from below Schuster, 2001 Seismic interferometry Herman, 1992 Wapenaar, 1993 True amplitude imaging One-way reciprocity theorems

4
State A State B A A B B Reciprocity interrelates states A and B

5
State A State B A A B B Reciprocity interrelates states A and B

7
State AState B Downgoing wavesand upgoing waves One-way reciprocity theorems

8
State AState B Convolution-type propagation invariant: constant One-way reciprocity theorems

9
State AState B Convolution-type reciprocity theorem: One-way reciprocity theorems

10
State AState B Correlation-type propagation invariant: constant One-way reciprocity theorems

11
State AState B Correlation-type reciprocity theorem: One-way reciprocity theorems

12
State AState B Derivation of relations between reflection and transmission responses States A and B with or without free surface

13
State AState B Derivation of relations between reflection and transmission responses States A and B with or without free surface Convolution- or correlation-type reciprocity

14
State AState B Derivation of relations between reflection and transmission responses States A and B with or without free surface Convolution- or correlation-type reciprocity Sources at upper or lower boundary

15
State AState B States A and B without free surface Convolution-type reciprocity Sources at upper boundary One-way source-receiver reciprocity

16
State AState B 00

17
State AState B

18
States A and B without free surface Convolution-type reciprocity Sources at lower boundary

20
States A and B without free surface Convolution-type reciprocity Source A at lower and source B at upper boundary

22
State AState B States A and B with free surface Convolution-type reciprocity Sources at upper boundary

23
State AState B

24
States A and B with free surface Convolution-type reciprocity Sources at lower boundary

26
States A and B with free surface Convolution-type reciprocity Source A at lower and source B at upper boundary

28
Summary of one-way source-receiver reciprocity Without free surface: With free surface:

29
State AState B States A and B without free surface Correlation-type reciprocity Sources at upper boundary From reflection to transmission

31
Herman, 1992 Wapenaar and Herrmann, 1993 Application in inverse wave field extrapolation

32
State AState B States A and B with free surface Correlation-type reciprocity Sources at lower boundary From transmission to reflection

34
1500 m/s 2000 m/s Acoustic daylight imaging Syncline model

35
Acoustic daylight imaging

37
Poster presentation Draganov et al.

38
State AState B State A without and state B with free surface Convolution-type reciprocity Sources at upper boundary Multiple elimination

39
Berkhout, 1982; Verschuur, Berkhout and Wapenaar, 1992 Fokkema and van den Berg, 1993, Van Borselen et al, 1996

40
Multiple elimination (van Borselen et al., 1996)

41
State AState B State A without and state B with free surface Correlation-type reciprocity Sources at upper boundary Seismic interferometry

42
Schuster, 2001, EAGE

43
Seismic interferometry

44
State AState B States A and B without free surface Correlation-type reciprocity Source A at upper and source B at lower boundary Reflection from below

46
State AState B Derivation of relations between reflection and transmission responses States A and B with or without free surface

47
State AState B Derivation of relations between reflection and transmission responses States A and B with or without free surface Convolution- or correlation-type reciprocity

48
State AState B Derivation of relations between reflection and transmission responses States A and B with or without free surface Convolution- or correlation-type reciprocity Sources at upper or lower boundary

49
Claerbout, 1968 SEG, 2002 Acoustic daylight imaging Berkhout, 1982 Multiple elimination Imaging from below Schuster, 2001 Seismic interferometry Herman, 1992 Wapenaar, 1993 True amplitude imaging One-way reciprocity theorems

50
Monitoring the universe by an array of telescopes

51
Monitoring the subsurface by an array of geophones

53
Combined monitoring the universe and the subsurface: Different applications; shared infrastructure

54
25% of antennas in central core High speed data transport Antenna cluster (Station) Central processor X Shared infrastructure (1)

55
Shared infrastructure (2)

Similar presentations

OK

Green’s function representations for seismic interferometry Kees Wapenaar 75 th SEG meeting, Houston November 8, 2005.

Green’s function representations for seismic interferometry Kees Wapenaar 75 th SEG meeting, Houston November 8, 2005.

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google