Presentation on theme: "Common Mistakes and Misconceptions During Data Collection and Analysis"— Presentation transcript:
1Common Mistakes and Misconceptions During Data Collection and Analysis Lean Six SigmaDMAIC process:Common Mistakes and Misconceptions During Data Collection and AnalysisHans Vanhaute04/08/2014
2Goal of tonight’s presentation Give you a few examples of common mistakes made during “Measure” phase of DMAIC projects.Draw more widely applicable lessons and conclusions that may benefit you (so you don’t make the same mistakes).Hopefully provide you with some interesting insights(and don’t put you to sleep).
3DMAIC and “Projects” “A problem scheduled for a solution.” Management decides the problem is important enough to provide the resources it needs to get the problem solved.
4“DMAIC Projects” Six Sigma DMAIC Project Eliminates a chronic problem that causes customer dissatisfaction, defects, costs of poor quality, or other deficiencies in performance.DEFINEMEASUREANALYZEIMPROVECONTROLVery Data-Intensive
5The DMAIC steps M – Measure Define a high-level process map. Define the measurement plan.Test the measurement system (“Gauge Study”).Collect the data to objectively establish current baseline.Typical tools:- Capability analysis- Gage R&Rs
6Capability Analysis Conundrums Initial AnalysisInstability of the process over timeY = f (unknown Xs)Black Box ProcessUnknown XsCpk values that inaccurately predict process performanceNon-normal data
7Capability Analysis Conundrums Case 1: Inherent non-normality of the process output.Some physical, chemical, transactional processes will produce outcomes that “lean” one way:Time measurementsValues close to zero, but that are always positive (surface roughness RMS…)…Process experts or careful analysis of the metric should be able to help with understanding.ExampleGood news: Capability Analysis of Non-Normal data is possible.Bad news: This situation doesn’t happen very often.
8Capability Analysis Conundrums Case 2: Problematic measurement systems(we’ll come back to that one when we discuss GR&R…)
9Capability Analysis Conundrums Case 3: Failure to stratify the data.This is the big one!Stratification is the separation of data into categories.It means to “break-up” the data to see what it tells you.Its most frequent use is when diagnosing a problem and identifying which categories contribute to the problem being solved.
11Capability Analysis Conundrums 1 Cpk value?Expected future performance of the process(es) assuming statistical stability over time.What is a Cpk value supposed to tell us?2 Cpk values?
12Capability Analysis Conundrums Over-estimating variation of the process.(Why?)Under-estimating process capability.Leading to all sorts of non-value-added activity for your organization.Recognize two of the four streams are main drivers of overall capability.Correct estimation of the two most important process capabilities.Points to appropriate improvement activities.
14Capability Analysis Conundrums Problematic measurement systems:2a: Limiting factors to “how well” you can measure something.2b: I passed my GR&R but I’m still getting “weird” results.2c: Time effects
15Case 2a: Limits to measurements Game: Identify the dataset with the highest resolution.Resolution:a: The process or capability of making distinguishable the individual parts of an object, closely adjacent optical images, or sources of lightb: A measure of the sharpness of an image or of the fineness with which a device can produce or record such an image.
16Case 2a: Limits to measurements Which dataset has the highest resolution?Measurement Resolution:a: The process or capability of making distinguishable the individual parts of a dataset or closely adjacent data points.b: A measure of the sharpness of a set of data or of the fineness with which a measurement device can produce or record such a dataset.??
17Case 2a: Limits to measurements Limiting factors to “how well” you can measure something.129.93979.04019.910.511.49.0Less resolutionLess resolution349.610.211.49.010119Less resolution
18Case 2a: Limits to measurements Limiting factors to “how well” you can measure something.12Less resolutionLess resolution34Less resolution
19Case 2a: Limits to measurements Limiting factors to “how well” you can measure something.12S = 1.000S = (0.5% over)Less resolutionLess resolution34S = (4% over)S = (15% over)Less resolution
20Case 2a: Limits to measurements Limiting factors to “how well” you can measure something:Why??“Always done it that way, never given it any thought”.Focus on “meeting specs” not on controlling process.“Always” round to x decimal places.Nobody told me how many decimals were needed…The old “1 in 10” rule of thumb seems to make sense.Resolution must be at least 1/10th of data rangeResolution must be at least 1/10th of spec range
21Case 2a: Limits to measurements Limiting factors to “how well” you can measure something:
22Case 2b: “Weird” StuffI passed my GR&R but I’m still getting “weird” results.GR&R 101:“Metrics”P/TV ratio expresses the total measurement variability as a percentage of the total historical process variation.Here P/TV ~ 14%Distribution ofMeasurementsDistribution ofmeasurement variability
23Case 2b: “Weird” StuffI passed my GR&R but I’m still getting “weird” results.GR&R 101: “Metrics”P/T expresses the total measurement variability as a percentage of the tolerance width of the process:Here P/T ~ 12.5%Spec. limitsDistribution ofmeasurement error
24Case 2b: “Weird” StuffI passed my GR&R but I’m still getting “weird” results.GR&R 101: “Metrics”P/TVP/TVery good<10%Marginal10 – 30%Needs Improvement> 30%Simple, right?Not so fast…
25Case 2b: “Weird” StuffI passed my GR&R but I’m still getting “weird” results.R chart by operator:Points inside control limits indicate that operator is consistent between repeat measurements made on same sample (GOOD)Points outside control limits indicate that operator is not consistent between repeat measurements made on same sample (BAD)
26Case 2b: “Weird” StuffI passed my GR&R but I’m still getting “weird” results.ExampleP/T = 22%P/TV = 16%
27Case 2b: “Weird” StuffI passed my GR&R but I’m still getting “weird” results.ExampleP/T = 70%P/TV = 40%P/T = 10%P/TV = 6%
28Case 2b: “Weird” StuffI passed my GR&R but I’m still getting “weird” results.So… what caused this?ExampleCameraLensRing LightPin Tip Position
29Case 2c: Time Effects The speed of Information is finite. Information can come from different distances.
30Case 2c: Time Effects The speed of Information is finite. Information can come from different distances.Pluto: 5.5 light-hours awayProxima Centauri: 4.2 light-years awaySun: 8 light-minutes awayMoon: 1.2 light-seconds awayMars: 12.5 light-minutes away
31Case 2c: Time Effects The speed of Information is finite. Information can come from different distances.Just because you “observe” (measure / see) several events “at the same time”, doesn’t mean they all occur(red) at the same time.
32Case 2c: Time Effects Arranged by order of observation Arranged by order of occurrenceExample
33Case 2c: Time Effects What can you do? Collect the data as close as possible to the origin of the event you are observing.“Traceability” of the events you are observing.“De-convolution” of the data.In mathematics, de-convolution is an algorithm-based process used to reverse the effects of convolution on recorded data
34So… What did we learn?Blind reliance on some index value (Cpk, Cp, P/T, P/TV,…) to tell you what is going on might get you in trouble.Always:Make sure you understand how the index is calculatedUse the approach fully, not half-wayVerify that all assumptions were metData stratification opportunities abound. Identify them early on in your project.A few simple rules of thumb will quickly help you determine if you have a chance of having a good measurement system.
35So… What did we learn?Further analysis of the Gage R&R data can provide you with some great insights into and improvement opportunities for your measurement process.Data has a finite speed. Being aware of this and planning for it during your measure phase will help keep you on the right track.
36Parting ThoughtsMy organization doesn’t use Six Sigma, do these insights benefit me as well?