Presentation on theme: "by Ralf Oelßner and Prof. Dr. Wolf Müller-Rostin,"— Presentation transcript:
1The Battle of the Aviation Industry to Cope with Weapons of Mass Destruction (and with Governments) by Ralf Oelßner andProf. Dr. Wolf Müller-Rostin,Delvag Aviation Insurance,Cologne
2Insuring the uninsurable Hull InsurancePartial coverage for hull damages caused by weapons of mass destruction (WMD) first introduced by insurers in May 2005Operating without hull coverage for WMD is no violation of legal requirement to maintain adequate insurance coverage, however, hull coverage necessary for financial stability of an air carrier
3Insuring the uninsurable Liability InsuranceAll operators’ and service providers’ aviation liability insurance policies subject to War, Hijacking and Other Perils Exclusion Clause (AVN 48 B)
4Insuring the uninsurable Most exclusions of AVN 48 B could normally be written back into policy coverage by Extended Coverage Endorsement AVN 52 EMost policies only excluded cover for damages caused by any hostile detonation of any weapon of war employing atomic or nuclear fission and/or fusion or other like reaction or radioactive force or matter
5Insuring the uninsurable Clauses proposed by the Aviation InsurersReplacement of AVN 48 B by AVN 48 CWrite backs by AVN 52 HExtended Coverage Endorsement (Aviation Liabilities) applicable to coverage provided to aircraft operatorsWrite backs by AVN 52 JExtended Coverage Endorsement (Aviation Liabilities) applicable to coverage provided to service providers
6Insuring the uninsurable The clauses proposed by the aviation insurers intend to exclude all cover for the hostile use of WMD, namely nuclear, radioactive contamination, biological, chemical and electromagnetic pulse devices or materials
7Insuring the uninsurable Clauses proposed by AEA / IATA / MarshReplacement of AVN 48 B by AVN 48 DAVN 52 K for aircraft operatorsAVN 52 L for service providersThe scope of AVN 48 D, AVN 52 K and AVN 52 L is to provide at least limited liability coverage for the hostile use of radioactive contamination, biological, chemical, electromagnetic pulse device or matter in addition to the other perils normally written back by AVN 52 clauses.
8Insuring the uninsurable „At least limited coverage“ means coverage under eithersingle aircraft cover orregulatory / corporate governance compliance coverthus providing flexibility in the write backs of perils for insured by selecting between various write back options and choices depending on anticipated loss scenarios.
9Insuring the uninsurable Single aircraft coverage covers WMD damages to an aircrafton board of which the WMD device solely and directly originates (in flight or on the ground) orthat suffers a crash fire explosion, a collision or a recorded emergency resulting from a WMD (except EMP) peril originating external (i. e. by missile ) to the aircraft while in flight.Excluded is coverage for any aircraft, that flies through a WMD contamination cloud and lands normally Reason for exclusion: multi aircraft contamination possible.
10Insuring the uninsurable Regulatory / corporate governance compliance coverage provides the opportunity to cover all WMD damages, but onlyfor restricted limits as per negotiation.Example: Explosion of aircraft covered under Single Aircraft Coverage affects other passengers of the same carrier who are sitting in other aircraft or waiting in the terminal.Passengers of other carriers (third party liability) would be covered by the third party aggregate limit available under the Single Aircraft Coverage or Regulatory Coverage, whichever is higher.
11Insuring the uninsurable Coverage under AVN 52 L (Service Providers) basically same as AVN 52 K, except for coverage for passengers, baggage, cargo and mail.
12Insuring the uninsurable Operating without complete liability insurance coverage is in violation of EU Regulations 2407/92 and 785/2004 and ofArt. 50 MCalso in violation of most lease contracts and of corporate governanceconsequences: grounding of the fleets
13Insuring the uninsurable AEA, IATA / Marsh in discussions with EU-Commission to clarify whether clauses would be deemed compliant with EU-Regulation 785/2004 (in particular passenger limit of SDR [in contrast to SDR required under the Regulation] in case of airport attack).
14Insuring the uninsurable Czech carriers operating under a State GuaranteeIrish Government enacted Air Navigation and Transport (Indemnities) Act of 2005Scope: to provide indemnities by the government to Irish air carriers, airports, aerodromes and service providers in a „state of difficulty“Indemnities limited to Euro 9 billion in the aggregateEU and other governments unwilling to act proactively