Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 Benchmarking ANL Procurement (where do we stack up??)

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 Benchmarking ANL Procurement (where do we stack up??)"— Presentation transcript:

1 1 Benchmarking ANL Procurement (where do we stack up??)

2 2 ANL PROCUREMENT MISSION To provide business services to support accomplishment of the Laboratory’s programmatic goals and objectives, within the limitations of the Prime Contract, applicable laws and executive orders, and University of Chicago requirements

3 3

4 4 ANL PROCUREMENT STRATEGY To change and improve the present system’s culture, management systems, and line processes consistent with the principles of Quality Management, in order to establish and maintain: a customer focus, a sense of urgency, continuous process improvement, with an emphasis on results.

5 5 ANL Procurement Trends FY * * * = Data Not Maintained *

6 6 Benchmarking ANL Procurement (sources of data)  CAPS/DOE – The Center for Advanced Purchasing Studies “DOE Contractors Benchmarking Report” – 22 DOE contractors surveyed, FY2000 data, updated with FY2001 data (where available)  CAPS/DEF - The Center for Advanced Purchasing Studies “Aerospace/Defense Industry Benchmarking Report” – 38 contractors surveyed 1999, updated with October 2001 data (where available)  DOE-BSC – “FY 2001 Contractor Balanced Scorecard Results” –FY2001 data – 32 DOE contractors reporting  All Comparisons with actual FY2002 Procurement Data

7 7 Benchmarking ANL Procurement (data used in this presentation)  ANL Human Resources (September 30, 2002) Employees 4850 FTE’s  ANL Budget Office (September 30, 2002) Laboratory Receipts $545,740,249  Procurement Statistics Dollars $184,700,000 Employees 55.5 FTEs

8 8 Procurement vs. Laboratory Funding (Procurement costs as a % of Laboratory funding) ANL Procurement costs as a % of Laboratory funding are comparable to the DOE Contractor average, and 20% less than the DOD Contractor average

9 9 Optimum Cost of Procurement (Procurement costs as % of obligations) The cost of ANL Procurement as a percent of obligated dollars is in line with other DOE Contractors and about 2/3 rds the cost of DOD Contractors

10 10 Acquisition Support (Procurement lead-time) Days ANL procurement on average processes procurement requirements in less than ½ the time as the CAPS benchmarks and DOE/BSC average

11 11 Effective Supplier Management (Percent of on-time deliveries) ANL On-time delivery exceeds the DOE/BSC average by 5.6%, and CAPS/DOE-DEF by 10%-12%

12 12 Effective Supplier Management (Percent of on-time deliveries – JIT system) ANL On-time delivery performance for exceeds the CAPS/DOE average for JIT by 4.4%

13 13 Effective Internal Controls (Percent of compliance) ANL Procurement compliance performance exceeds DOE/BSC average by 4.0%

14 14 Customer Satisfaction (Percent of satisfied customers) ANL Procurement customer performance exceeds DOE/BSC average by 7%

15 15 Procurement Head Count (Procurement personal as % of Laboratory head count) The current head count of Procurement employees is 26.0% less than the CAPS/DOE benchmarking average of 1.54 Procurement employees per 100 DOE Contractor employees, and less than 1/3 the benchmarking average of 3.72 Procurement employees per 100 DOD Contractor Employees

16 16 % of Costs Returned to ANL ANL Procurement Department has negotiated cost savings in excess of total Procurement costs for FY2002 by 120% Millions $


Download ppt "1 Benchmarking ANL Procurement (where do we stack up??)"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google