Presentation on theme: "Public Opinion and Energy Policy Michael Canes USAEE Annual North American Conference Anchorage, Alaska July 31, 2013."— Presentation transcript:
Public Opinion and Energy Policy Michael Canes USAEE Annual North American Conference Anchorage, Alaska July 31, 2013
Topics How does public opinion affect energy policy? Where is the public on energy? –Evidence from recent public opinion polls What, if anything, does this mean for energy economists? 2
How does public opinion affect energy policy? Public attitudes are one factor among many that policy makers take into account Others include: –Industry positions & information –NGO positions & information –Local opinion - “all politics is local” –Economic reality Government fiscal constraints Costs of alternative policies The state of technology Policy makers also know that public attitudes change over time 3
Where is the public on energy? Frequently, national polls cover energy along with other topics National samples usually are sufficient to give high confidence to results –However, questions often don’t confront those interviewed with direct costs to them of policy choices –Further, how questions are phrased can affect what answers are received –Still, in the aggregate national polling results reveal what a majority of the public thinks about energy at a given point in time 4
Could policy choices influence public opinion rather than the other way around? Which way does cause and effect run? Little evidence that the public thinks highly of policy makers –Job approval ratings (WSJ/NBC) Congress – 12% of public approves, 83% disapprove President Obama - 45% approve, 50% disapprove –Direction of Country – 31% right direction, 59% wrong direction (Real Clear Politics) Political leaders compete for public approval, not other way around Difficult to conclude that public opinion simply reflects policy maker choices 5
Sources of Public Opinion Data A number of organizations regularly poll public attitudes towards energy matters –Gallup –Pew Center –United Technologies/National Journal –CBS/New York Times –ABC News/Washington Post –CNN/ORC Most of these polls survey 1000-1500 people, produce margins of error of +/- 3 percent or so. 6
Basic question: Is Energy Important to the Public? Extremely or Very Important (%) Moderately Important (%) Not Important (%) The Economy86114 Education85113 Health Care81154 Energy 78175 Gas Prices 72217 Budget deficit711710 The environment70227 7 Source: AP/NORC April 2012.
Next question: What Should be Done? More production of oil, gas and coal? More energy efficiency? More production of alternate energy (wind, solar, etc.)? Both equally or don’t know 365113 315910 345411 8 Sources: 1 st two results are Gallup 2013; last is Pew 2013 The public appears to favor conservation/efficiency and alternate energy over conventional fossil fuel production.
But Detailed Results Concerning Specific Fuels Show that Natural Gas Breaks Away from Other Fossil Fuels and Nuclear Expansion is not Much Favored More Emphasis (%) Less Emphasis (%) Same Emphasis as now (%) Unsure (%) Solar7610122 Wind7112161 Natural Gas6510242 Oil4632211 Nuclear3732283 Coal3141253 9 Source: Gallup 2013
Support for Policies Roughly Mirrors Attitudes Towards Forms of Energy Favor (%)Oppose (%)Unsure (%) Require more efficient vehicles 78193 Spend more on R&D for wind, solar and fuel cells 69265 Open up government lands for oil and gas exploration 65342 Increase the use of nuclear energy 44497 10 Source: Pew 2012.
Attitudes Concerning Some Contemporary Energy Issues Support (%)Oppose (%)Unsure (%) Build the Keystone XL Pipeline? 67249 Stop New Regulations on Power Plant Emissions? 464212 Support or Oppose Hydraulic Fracturing? 483814 11 Sources: First two questions; United Technologies/National Journal Congressional Connection, 2013; last question Pew, 2013
What About Energy Taxes? 10¢/gallon increase in the federal gasoline tax 12 MeasureAverage Percent Support (2011-12) Straight 10¢/gallon Increase22% 10¢/gallon increase, revenues spent to reduce pollution/global warming 44% 10¢/gallon increase, revenues spent to reduce accidents & improve safety 55% 10¢/gallon increase, revenues spent to maintain streets, roads and highways 60% Source: Mineta Transportation Institute, SJSU Research Center
Attitudes Towards a Carbon Tax Favor (%)Oppose (%)Indifferent or Unsure (%) Impose a carbon tax with monies used to pay down the national debt 61325 Impose a carbon tax even if it results in $180/yr payment by average U.S. household 38566 Straight carbon tax294525 Carbon tax with $500 per person rebate 343729 13 Sources: 1 st two Yale/GMU 2013; 2 nd two Duke U. 2013
What do These Data Mean for Policy Makers? In the abstract, the public likes energy efficiency, renewables, natural gas –Facilitating these through subsidies and other means likely will be favorably received It does not much like coal or nuclear power –Not much political gain from facilitating these It favors a carbon tax until it’s asked to pay, but might go along if the monies were returned directly to taxpayers – Carbon tax/rebate mechanism would have to be well explained It may favor a small increase in the federal gas tax if the monies are devoted to improvements that affect driving –Might be scope for a small gasoline tax increase if uses of revenues can be constrained to things the public favors 14
What do They Mean for Energy Economists? Public attitudes matter to policy choices, but these attitudes aren’t fixed –Other things also affect policy choices –Well grounded economic analyses of costs and benefits of policy choices can and sometimes do shape public opinion Policy makers look to economists among others to inform them of the consequences of policy actions –Policy makers want to avoid unpleasant surprises, look to analysts to help –Ability to explain results of good analysis to policy makers and to the media sometimes as important as the analysis itself –Energy economists in a position to add value to public debate, policy choices 15
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.