Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Figure 1. Standardized coefficients for the SEM group model for heterosexual males. Latent constructs are shown in ellipses, and observed variables are.

Published byRosamund Kelley Modified over 6 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Figure 1. Standardized coefficients for the SEM group model for heterosexual males. Latent constructs are shown in ellipses, and observed variables are."— Presentation transcript:

1 Figure 1. Standardized coefficients for the SEM group model for heterosexual males. Latent constructs are shown in ellipses, and observed variables are shown in rectangles. Indirect effect β = −.12, SD = .028, p < ***p < .001; only significance for the structural model is displayed. CIH= complementary and integrative health; SD = standard deviation. From: HIV Stigma and Older Men's Psychological Well-Being: Do Coping Resources Differ for Gay/Bisexual and Straight Men? J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. Published online July 21, doi: /geronb/gbx101 J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

2 Figure 2. Standardized coefficients for the SEM group model for gay/bisexual males. Latent constructs are shown in ellipses, and observed variables are shown in rectangles. Indirect effect β = −.24, SD = .056, p < ***p < .001; only significance for the structural model is displayed. CIH= complementary and integrative health; SD = standard deviation. From: HIV Stigma and Older Men's Psychological Well-Being: Do Coping Resources Differ for Gay/Bisexual and Straight Men? J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. Published online July 21, doi: /geronb/gbx101 J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

Download ppt "Figure 1. Standardized coefficients for the SEM group model for heterosexual males. Latent constructs are shown in ellipses, and observed variables are."

Similar presentations

From: A Regularist Approach to Mechanistic Type-Level Explanation

From: A Regularist Approach to Mechanistic Type-Level Explanation
From: An open day in the metric space

From: An open day in the metric space
Figure 5. The relationship between hepatic lymphocyte subsets, hepatosteatosis and perisinusoidal fibrosis. Hepatosteatosis was associated with ( a )

Figure 5. The relationship between hepatic lymphocyte subsets, hepatosteatosis and perisinusoidal fibrosis. Hepatosteatosis was associated with ( a )
Fig. 1 The non-genomic effects of E2 on aggressive behavior are seasonally variable in songbirds and mice. Bar graphs (mean ± SEM) representing.

Fig. 1 The non-genomic effects of E2 on aggressive behavior are seasonally variable in songbirds and mice. Bar graphs (mean ± SEM) representing.
Figure 1. Effects of state home- and community-based services (HCBS) expenditures on the hazard of nursing home admission by child availability. The x.

Figure 1. Effects of state home- and community-based services (HCBS) expenditures on the hazard of nursing home admission by child availability. The x.
Figure 1 The spatial and temporal distribution of diarrhoea rates

Figure 1 The spatial and temporal distribution of diarrhoea rates
From: Global Banking: Recent Developments and Insights from Research*

From: Global Banking: Recent Developments and Insights from Research*
Figure 1. Flow diagram of participants recruited into the study.

Figure 1. Flow diagram of participants recruited into the study.
Fig. 1 Graphical representation

Fig. 1 Graphical representation
Figure 2. CONSORT flow diagram.

Figure 2. CONSORT flow diagram.
Figure 1. Period–cohort diagram.

Figure 1. Period–cohort diagram.
Source:Rosnes and Vennemo 2009.

Source:Rosnes and Vennemo 2009.
From: Political Leadership and Power Redistribution

From: Political Leadership and Power Redistribution
Figure 1. The Modified Dual Pathway Model.

Figure 1. The Modified Dual Pathway Model.
Figure 1. Disposition of study participants, by group. Data are no

Figure 1. Disposition of study participants, by group. Data are no
Figure 1. Structural Equation Model: Effects of Valence Framing on Perceived Truth of Statements and Source Trustworthiness. Standardized path-coefficients.

Figure 1. Structural Equation Model: Effects of Valence Framing on Perceived Truth of Statements and Source Trustworthiness. Standardized path-coefficients.
Table 5 Village Characteristics Based on the Census of India 1991, by Mandate during which a First SHG was Created in the Village From: Public Good Provision.

Table 5 Village Characteristics Based on the Census of India 1991, by Mandate during which a First SHG was Created in the Village From: Public Good Provision.
Figure 1. Programme provisions, eligibility, evaluation period and geographical coverage of programme over time From: Impact evaluation of free delivery.

Figure 1. Programme provisions, eligibility, evaluation period and geographical coverage of programme over time From: Impact evaluation of free delivery.
Figure 3. Average response time by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), group, and condition. Error bars represent standard error. Response time was measured as.

Figure 3. Average response time by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), group, and condition. Error bars represent standard error. Response time was measured as.
Figure 1. Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli (STEC) isolates by method of initial detection and STEC serotype, Connecticut, 2000–2009. From: Ten-Year.

Figure 1. Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli (STEC) isolates by method of initial detection and STEC serotype, Connecticut, 2000–2009. From: Ten-Year.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google