Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byKatelyn Hahn Modified over 3 years ago

1
Gross Estimates The Brooks Formula Patrick Boens 12/05/2010

2
Page 1 1.Background 2.Context & Objectives 3.Formula 1.Base 2.Updated 1.Developers focus 2.Supervision 3.Contingency 4.Deployment Agenda

3
Page 2 Background Frederick Brooks is a Software Engineer and Computer Scientist, best-known for managing the development of IBM 0S/360. Author of the famous The Mythical Man-Month, a book about Software Engineering and Project Management. He had mistakenly added more workers to a project falling behind schedule, considering the equivalence of resources and time (Man-Month). In his book, he presents a simple formula for software estimates, a formula he considered to be invalid in subsequent editions. Still, this formula is a very good basis for early estimates.

4
Page 3 Context & Objectives Early stages of a project (inception, initiation) Gross != precise it gives an idea, a rough estimate (no equivalence with COCOMO II for example)

5
Page 4 Base Formula Effort = 1/3 specs + 1/6 code + 1/4 ut + 1/4 it … where -specs= requirements + analysis -code= build -ut= unit tests -it= integration testing

6
Page 5 Updated Formula Some refinements are needed in order to cope with Prince 2 sort of slicing: -Specs = Requirements + analyses (BA, FA, TA) = 1/3= 4/12 -Code = Code + Unit tests= 1/6 + 1/4= 5/12 -Tests = Integration Testing + Functional Testing*= 1/4 = 3/12 *UAT is not included (not a concern of IT)

7
Page 6 Updated Formula Supervision effort (PM and Team Leader work) not included Contingency not included Deployment effort not included The formula becomes: -Specs = Requirements + analyses = 1/3= 4/12 -Code = Code + Unit tests= 1/6 + 1/4= 5/12 -Tests = Integration Testing + Functional Testing= 1/4 = 3/12 -+ supervision + contingency + deployment effort

8
Page 7 Updated formula: Developers focus Developers focus on: -Specs = Requirements + analyses = 1/3= 4/12 -Code = Code + Unit tests= 1/6 + 1/4= 5/12 -Tests = Integration Testing + Functional Testing= 1/4 = 3/12 -+ supervision + contingency + deployment effort

9
Page 8 Updated formula: Supervision Supervision is often seen as a percentage of the overall project (± 15%*) Example: Specs + Code + Tests = 100 mdays Supervision = 15 mdays Total effort = 100 mdays + 15 mdays = 115 mdays * Although acceptable, a more precise formula exists to calculate the Supervision effort. well see this in a minute

10
Page 9 Updated formula: Contingency Contingency is a way to foresee whats impredictable. Statistically, 17% contingency is used. This percentage must be adapted to the context of your project, based on the degree of uncertainty. Example: Specs + Code + Tests + Supervision = 115 mdays Contingency = 20 mdays Total effort = 100 mdays + 15 mdays + 20 mdays = 135 mdays

11
Page 10 Updated formula: an example Imagine a developers evaluation of 50 mdays, and now calculate the overall effort 1/12 = 10 mdays specs= 4/12 = 40 mdays code= 5/12 = 50 mdays tests*= 3/12 = 30 mdays Effort = 40 mdays + 50 mdays + 30 mdays = 120 mdays Supervision = 120 mdays x 15/100 = 18 mdays Contingency = 138 mdays x 17/100 = 23 mdays Deployment = x mdays (say, 5) Total effort = 161 mdays + 5 mdays = 166 mdays * UAT not included

12
Page 11 Updated formula: the bottom line You started with 50 mdays and you ended up with 166 mdays! This sounds funny: an experienced Project Manager said that he always multiplied the developers evaluations by PI 50 mdays x 3.141592 = 157 mdays!... which is close enough to the end result (it remains a gross figure!) * UAT not included

13
Page 12 Supervision Effort : 15% Time and team size must be balanced (theoretical view). A project of 6 months should be worked out with 6 people (team size and duration are equilibrated = square root). Always favor more time instead of more people (get back to Brooks findings). A PM is needed for the whole duration of the project. If a month work is 20 days of work, you need the PM during 6 x 20 days, x% of his time. The direct span of control is about 6 people* for a project of 3 months, you need the PM half of his time; for a 6 months project, you need him full-time. Getting back to our example of 50 mdays of developers estimates we have calculated an effort of 120 mdays 120 / 20 = 6 SQRT(6) = 2.45 team of 2 people and timeline of 3 months ( 2 x 20 x 3 = 120 mdays) (ideal view) PM is needed 33% of his time (2 persons for a possible span of 6) during 3 months Supervision effort = 3 x 20 x 1/3 = 20 mdays (instead of 18 mdays with 15%). Contingency of 17% (120 + 20 ) mdays x 17/100 = 24 mdays Deployment (5 mdays) Total effort = 120 + 20 + 24 + 5 = 169 mdays remember, you started from 50! * Software industry

Similar presentations

Presentation is loading. Please wait....

OK

PowerPoint Historical Review

PowerPoint Historical Review

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on library management system in c++ Ppt on industrial employment standing order act 1946 Ppt on difference between mission and vision Free ppt on mobile number portability in india Ppt on types of research methods and designs Download ppt on algebraic expressions and identities for class 8 Ppt on intelligent manufacturing journal Ppt on regional transport office ahmedabad Ppt on study and manufacturing of turbo generator Ppt on culture and science in the ancient period