Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byKatherine Carroll Modified over 6 years ago
1
Figure 1 Cumulative chance of pregnancy according to age at initiation of pregnancy seeking. The curves were drawn based on the following assumptions: (i) the achievement of pregnancy per cycle was considered an independent event for every cycle, (ii) the mean number of cycles per year set at 13 and (iii) the fecundity rate declined linearly with age. From: Age-related infertility and unexplained infertility: an intricate clinical dilemma Hum Reprod. 2016;31(7): doi: /humrep/dew066 Hum Reprod | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please
2
Figure 2 Sensitivity analyses on the rate of false positive diagnoses of unexplained infertility. The basal model is depicted in black. Three different scenarios were tested: (i) increase of the fecundity rate (FR) from 20 to 30% (red line), (ii) increase in the prevalence of infertility from 10 to 15% (blue line) and (iii) decrease of the proportion of unexplained infertility (UI) from 25 to 15% (green line). The two dotted lines illustrated the thresholds of 50 and 75% rates of false positive diagnoses. The upper panel shows the results of the analyses using a threshold of pregnancy seeking of 1 year. The lower panel shows the results of the same analyses but using a threshold of 2 years. From: Age-related infertility and unexplained infertility: an intricate clinical dilemma Hum Reprod. 2016;31(7): doi: /humrep/dew066 Hum Reprod | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.