Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

ACCORD Microvascular Outcomes

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "ACCORD Microvascular Outcomes"— Presentation transcript:

1 ACCORD Microvascular Outcomes
Faramarz Ismail-Beigi, MD, PhD Case Western Reserve University For the ACCORD Study Group

2 Outcome Definitions Nephropathy (5 outcomes) Eye complications (4 outcomes) Neuropathy (4 outcomes) Composite; replicating the UKPDS Composite; replicating the UKPDS plus neuropathy 15 distinct outcomes overall

3 Analysis Technique For each outcome:
Determine whether event has occurred If no event, censor observation at last surveillance time If event, assign event time as midpoint between event discovery and most recent prior surveillance time Pre-transition analyses – use only surveillance prior to 02/05/2008 End of Study analyses – use surveillance through end of trial (June 2009)

4 Analysis Technique Outcomes analyzed using survival analysis techniques (K-M plots and proportional hazards regression) Primary efficacy model includes 1. glycemia arm 2. second trial arm (BP intensive/standard; Lipid fibrate/placebo) 3. secondary prevention status All analyses performed by intention-to-treat (no post-randomization covariates examined)

5 Selected Baseline Characteristics
Characteristic Standard Intensive BMI (kg/m2) HbA1c (%) BP (mm Hg) 135/ /75 Triglycerides (mmol/l) HDL, men (mmol/l) HDL, women (mmol/l)

6 Selected Characteristics at Transition (February 2008)
Characteristic Standard Intensive BMI (kg/m2) * HbA1c (%) * BP (mm Hg) / /67* Triglycerides (mmol/l) * HDL, men (mmol/l) * HDL, women (mmol/l) * * Denotes P<0.05

7 Selected Characteristics at Study End (June 2009)
Characteristic Standard Intensive BMI (kg/m2) * HbA1c (%) * BP (mm Hg) / /68 Triglycerides (mmol/l) * HDL, men (mmol/l) HDL, women (mmol/l) * Denotes P<0.05

8 Composite Microvascular Outcomes
1st Composite Outcome: Development of renal failure or diabetic eye complications Renal failure: initiation of dialysis or ESRD, renal transplantation, or irreversible rise of serum creatinine above 3.3 mg/dL Eye complications: retinal photocoagulation or vitrectomy to treat diabetic retinopathy Essentially replicates UKPDS composite microvascular outcome

9 Results – Composite Outcome #1
Development of renal failure or retinal photocoagulation or vitrectomy to treat diabetic retinopathy (similar to UKPDS) Until Transition Through End of Study HR (95% CI): (0.88, 1.14) P = 0.99 HR (95% CI): (0.85, 1.07) P = 0.42

10 Composite Microvascular Outcomes
2nd Composite Outcome: Development of renal failure, or retinal photocoagulation or vitrectomy to treat diabetic retinopathy, or development of neuropathy Adds neuropathy to 1st Composite Outcome (neuropathy defined as MNSI score ≥ 2.5)

11 Results – Composite Outcome #2
Development of renal failure, or retinal photocoagulation or vitrectomy to treat diabetic retinopathy, or development of neuropathy (MNSI score ≥ 2.5) Until Transition Through End of Study HR (95% CI): (0.89, 1.02) P = 0.20 HR (95% CI): (0.89, 1.01) P = 0.12

12 Nephropathy Outcomes 4. Development of any of outcomes 1 to 3, above
1. Development of microalbuminuria (albumin:creatinine ratio ≥30 and <300 mg/g) 2. Development of macroalbuminuria (albumin:creatinine ratio ≥ 300 mg/g) 3. Development of renal failure (initiation of dialysis or ESRD, or renal transplantation, or irreversible rise of serum creatinine above 3.3 mg/dL) 4. Development of any of outcomes 1 to 3, above 5. Doubling of baseline serum creatinine or more than 20 mL/min/1.73 m2 decrease in estimated GFR

13 Results – Nephropathy Outcome #1
Development of microalbuminuria (urine albumin:creatinine ratio ≥ 30 mg/g) Until Transition Through End of Study HR (95% CI): 0.85 (0.77, 0.94) P=0.0012 HR (95% CI): 0.79 (0.69, 0.90) P=

14 Results – Nephropathy Outcome #2
Development of macroalbuminuria (urine albumin:creatinine ratio ≥ 300 mg/g) Until Transition Through End of Study HR (95% CI): (0.54, 0.86) P = HR (95% CI): 0.71 (0.59, 0.86) P =

15 Results – Nephropathy Outcome #3
Development of renal failure: initiation of dialysis or ESRD, or renal transplant, or a rise of serum creatinine above 3.3 mg/dL Until Transition Through End of Study HR (95% CI): (0.73, 1.24) P = 0.71 HR (95% CI): (0.73, 1.16) P = 0.49

16 Results – Nephropathy Outcome #4
Development of any of the following nephropathy outcomes (Doubling of serum creatinine or more than 20 mL/min/1.73 m2 decrease in estimated GFR or development of macroalbuminuria, or development of renal failure) Until Transition Through End of Study HR (95% CI): 1.07 (1.02, 1.13) P = HR (95% CI): (0.99, 1.10) P = 0.11

17 Mean Serum Creatinine Levels
Intensive Standard ________ Until Transition Through End of Study HR (95% CI): (1.02, 1.13) P = 0.02 HR (95% CI): (0.99, 1.10) P = 0.11

18 Results – Nephropathy Outcome #5
Doubling of baseline serum creatinine or more than 20 mL/min/1.73 m2 decrease in estimated GFR Until Transition Through End of Study HR (95% CI): (0.70, 0.94) P = 0.005 HR (95% CI): 1.03 (0.98, 1.08) P=0.270 HR (95% CI): 1.05 (1.00, 1.11) P=0.067

19 Diabetic Eye Complications
1. Retinal photocoagulation or vitrectomy to treat diabetic retinopathy 2. Eye surgery for cataract extraction 3. Three-line change (i.e., worsening) in visual acuity 4. Severe vision loss (Snellen fraction <20/200)

20 Results – Diabetic Eye Complication Outcome #1
Retinal photocoagulation or vitrectomy for retinopathy Until Transition Through End of Study HR (95% CI): (0.87, 1.17) P = 0.90 HR (95% CI): (0.85, 1.10) P = 0.62

21 Results – Diabetic Eye Complication Outcome #2
Eye surgery for cataract extraction Until Transition Through End of Study HR (95% CI): (0.79, 1.02) P = 0.105 HR (95% CI): (0.80, 0.99) P =

22 Results – Diabetic Eye Complication Outcome #3
Three line change in visual acuity (using Log MAR visual acuity chart) Until Transition Through End of Study HR (95% CI): 0.91 (0.84, 0.98) P = 0.012 HR (95% CI): 0.94 (0.89, 1.00) P = 0.050 HR (95% CI): 0.84 (0.73, 0.97) P = HR (95% CI): 0.94 (0.89, 1.00) P =

23 Results – Diabetic Eye Complication Outcome #4
Severe vision loss (Snellen fraction <20/200) Until Transition Through End of Study HR (95% CI): (0.80, 1.13) P = 0.57 HR (95% CI): (0.88, 1.16) P = 0.91

24 Neuropathy Outcomes 1. Score of ≥ 2.5 on the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) 2. Loss of vibratory sensation 3. Loss of ankle jerk during Jendrassic maneuver 4. Loss of pressure sensation (measured by 10 gm force monofilament test)

25 Results – Neuropathy Outcome #1
Score of ≥ 2.5 on the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) Until Transition Through End of Study HR (95% CI): 0.92 (0.86, 0.99) P = HR (95% CI): (0.87, 1.01) P = 0.08

26 Results – Neuropathy Outcome #2
Loss of vibratory sensation using 128 Hz tuning fork Until Transition Through End of Study HR (95% CI): (0.86, 1.05) P = 0.29 HR (95% CI): (0.85, 1.01) P = 0.080

27 Results – Neuropathy Outcome #3
Loss of ankle jerk during Jendrassic maneuver Until Transition Through End of Study HR (95% CI): (0.87, 1.01) P = 0.10 HR (95% CI): (0.84, 0.97) P =

28 Results – Neuropathy Outcome #4
Loss of pressure sensation by 10 gm force monofilament test Until Transition Through End of Study HR (95% CI): (0.77, 1.00) P = HR (95% CI): (0.75, 0.95) P =

29 Summary of Microvascular Results
Up to Transition Pr(≥ 1 significant test) = 0.54

30 Summary of Microvascular Results
Through End of Study P (≥ 1 significant test) = 0.54

31 Conclusions Intensive treatment of glycemia in the ACCORD cohort did not reduce the risk of composite measures of advanced microvascular outcomes Intensive therapy delayed the onset of albuminuria and some measures of eye complications and neuropathy Microvascular benefits of intensive therapy should be weighed against increase in total and CVD-related mortality, increased weight gain, and high risk for severe hypoglycemia

32


Download ppt "ACCORD Microvascular Outcomes"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google