Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

SITE VISITOR WORKSHOP May 12, 2107 Chicago, IL

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "SITE VISITOR WORKSHOP May 12, 2107 Chicago, IL"— Presentation transcript:

1 SITE VISITOR WORKSHOP May 12, 2107 Chicago, IL
Jay Hicks, Ed.D., R.T.(R) Executive Associate Director

2

3 Joint Review Committee on Education in Radiologic Technology
Established in 1969 Autonomous since 1994 710 accredited programs Recognized by USDE and CHEA Specialized and Institutional Accreditor Title IV 1969 – ASRT and ACR commissioned the JRCERT within the structure of allied health education accreditation provided by the AMA’s Council on Medical Education.  The JRCERT, incorporated in 1971, assumed the duties for site visits and evaluation of educational programs in the radiologic sciences. In 1976, the AMA’s CME delegated Allied Health Education accreditation to the newly created Committee on Allied Health and Educational Accreditation (CAHEA) – ASRT House of Delegates requested that the JRCERT Board of Directors develop an action plan and timetable for the withdrawal of JRCERT from its collaborative relationship with CAHEA and establish itself as the only recognized accrediting agency of educational programs for the radiographer and radiation therapist. AMA established Commission on Accreditation of Allied Health Education Programs (CAAHEP), JRCERT Board did not wish to join, wrote USDE petition and gained initial(interim) approval Jan 1994.

4 Who Are We? : Promotes excellence in education and elevates the quality and safety of patient care through the accreditation of educational programs in radiography, radiation therapy, magnetic resonance, and medical dosimetry.

5 Board of Directors Laura S. Aaron, Ph.D., R.T.(R)(M)(QM), FASRT - Chair Tricia D. Leggett, D.H.Ed., R.T.(R)(QM) - 1st Vice Chair Bette Schans, Ph.D., R.T.(R), FASRT - 2nd Vice Chair Laura Borghardt, M.S., CMD - Secretary/Treasurer

6 Board of Directors Beverly J. Felder, M.P.A Julie L. Lasley, Ph.D., R.T.(R)(T) Lisa F. Schmidt, Ph.D., R.T.(R)(M), CRT(R) Jason W. Stephenson, M.D. Loraine D. Zelna, M.S., R.T.(R)(MR)

7 Activity Update(s) Full Standards Revision
We will be seeking YOUR input throughout the revision Accreditation Management System (AMS) Survey of Evaluation of Portal Web Page Revision

8 Update(s)

9 Update(s) Pulse Newsletter

10 Accreditation Defined Types
Verifying that programs meet the standards established by the profession, peers, and other special interest groups. Evaluated by peers Promotes programs to reflect, identify, improve, critique Provides assurance that program is committed to excellence and providing quality education Access to Federal and State funds, Transferability

11 Peer Review (Site Visitors)
Foundational concept in higher education accreditation Representative (Face) of the JRCERT Various Roles/ Who are you? Institutional Official (Dean, Assessment, IE) Program Directors Clinical Coordinators Faculty Clinical Instructors Practitioners

12 Site Visitors Current ~ 200 (250) Roles Team Chair (74)
Team Member (74) Apprentice (57) Pending Seminar (43) Educators Practitioners Academicians Administrators Distance Education Experience

13 Clear Analytic Thinking Diplomacy/ Personable
Successful Traits Clear Analytic Thinking Diplomacy/ Personable Detective Skills Clear Writing Skills Good Communication Skills Supportive of the Accreditation Process

14 JRCERT Accreditation Criteria
Accreditation Policies Standards for an Educational Program in Radiography Radiation Therapy Magnetic Resonance Medical Dosimetry

15 Accreditation Process
Application/Self Study Report due within 6 months Site Visit scheduled within 6 months Report of Site Visit Team Findings due within 1 month Report of Findings due within 3 months Program response to Report of Findings due within 6-8 weeks ~Monthly Board Meeting Flowchart

16 Accreditation Actions
Probationary Accreditation Administrative Probationary Accreditation Withholding Accreditation Withdrawal of Accreditation Voluntary Involuntary ACCREDITATION -- Accreditation is awarded to an existing or a new program, following the accreditation review process, for various lengths of time based on the degree of compliance with the relevant accreditation standards. PROBATIONARY ACCREDITATION--- Probationary Accreditation may be awarded when an accredited program is subsequently determined not to be in substantial compliance with the relevant accreditation standards. Probationary Accreditation is usually limited to one (1) year. It may not extend beyond two (2) years ADMINISTRATIVE PROBATIONARY ACCREDITATION -- Administrative Probationary Accreditation may be awarded for a maximum of ninety (90) days -when a program does not comply with one (1) or more of the following administrative requirements for maintaining accreditation: Policy

17 Accreditation Award Levels
Initial 3 year maximum W/Wo progress report Continuing 8 year maximum 5 years w/wo progress report 3 years w/wo progress report Probation

18 Compliance Timeframe Program length 2 year or longer 1 year
24 months 18 months Failure to demonstrate compliance within the specified time period will result in Involuntary Withdrawal of Accreditation. Procedure A

19 Transparency Policy 10:700 – Disclosure of Accreditation Status

20 STANDARDS

21 Understanding the Standards
Explanation Required Program Response Possible Site Visitor Evaluation Methods

22 Using the Standards

23 Position Statement Mammography
The JRCERT has determined programs must make every effort to place a male student in a mammography clinical rotation if requested; however, programs will not be expected to attempt to override clinical site policies that restrict mammography rotations to female students. Male students should be advised that placement in a mammography rotation is not guaranteed and, in fact, would be very unlikely. To deny mammography educational experience to female students, however, would place those students at a disadvantage in the workforce where there is a demand for appropriately educated professionals to address the needs of patients. It is noted that the same clinical site policies that are in place during the mammography educational rotations are most likely applicable upon employment, thus limiting access for males to pursue careers in mammography. Position Statement found under Programs & Faculty/Program Resources

24 Basis for Interpretation of Standard One – Objective 1.2
Current imaging practices in mammography have resulted in minimal employment opportunities for males. Less than 1% of the ~50,000 R.T.(M) are male

25 Radiography, Radiation Therapy, and Medical Dosimetry
Standard Four - Health and Safety The program’s policies and procedures promote the health, safety, and optimal use of radiation for students, patients, and the general public. Objective 4.1: Assures the radiation safety of students through the implementation of published policies and procedures that are in compliance with Nuclear Regulatory Commission regulations and state laws as applicable. Interpretation found under Programs & Faculty/JRCERT Standards

26 Radiography, Radiation Therapy, and Medical Dosimetry
Interpretation: All students who participate in using equipment in a energized laboratory or clinical environment must be monitored for radiation exposure, including by not limited to simulation procedures or quality assurance. Adopted by the Joint Review Committee on Education in Radiologic Technology: 04/15 (effective 04/15) Interpretation found under Programs & Faculty/JRCERT Standards

27 Magnetic Resonance Standard Four - Health and Safety
The program’s policies and procedures promote the health and safety for students, patients, and the general public. Objective 4.1: Makes available to students and the general public accurate information about potential workplace hazards associated with magnetic fields.

28 Magnetic Resonance Interpretation: Information regarding the potential dangers of implants or foreign bodies in students must be published and provided to students and the general public. Programs must establish a safety screening protocol for all students that assures that students are appropriately screened for magnetic wave or radiofrequency hazards. Programs must describe how they prepare students for magnetic resonance safe practices and provide a copy of the screening protocol. Adopted by the Joint Review Committee on Education in Radiologic Technology: 10/14 (effective 10/14)

29 Radiography, Radiation Therapy, and Medical Dosimetry
Standard Four - Health and Safety The program’s policies and procedures promote the health, safety, and optimal use of radiation for students, patients, and the general public. Objective 4.3: Assures that students employ proper radiation safety practices.

30 Radiography, Radiation Therapy, and Medical Dosimetry
Interpretation: Programs must establish a safety screening protocol for students having potential access to the magnetic resonance environment. This assures that students are appropriately screened for magnetic wave or radiofrequency hazards. Programs must describe how they prepare students for magnetic resonance safe practices and provide a copy of the screening protocol, if applicable. Adopted by the Joint Review Committee on Education in Radiologic Technology: 10/14 (effective 10/14) Interpretation found under Programs & Faculty/JRCERT Standards

31 Standards: Additional Areas to Address
Sponsorship Consortium Cooperative Agreement Substantive Changes Policy Curricular Tracks Distance Part-time

32 Planning a Site Visit JRCERT You
Accreditation Services Coordinator – Janet Murzyn Site Visit Scheduling Form Planning Assignments Conflict of Interest Willingness to Serve Communicate with ASC Conflict of Interest Assignment to Team COI – must address any real or perceived conflict of interest.

33 Assignment to Team Minimum of 2 11.603A
Sponsorship Minimum of 2 11.603A Geographic Conflict of Interest Apprentice State Reps Assignment to Team State Reps – JRCERT has contracts in Nebraska, Kentucky, New Jersey, New York, and West Virginia to share confidential programmatic information. Representatives from these states could also participate in any announced or unannounced site visits COI -- Any potential conflict or concerns should be discussed with JRCERT staff

34 Preparing for Site Visit – Tools
Standards Interpretations JRCERT Correspondence Self-Study Review Letter Previous Report of Findings Award Letter Self-Study Report Website Site Visitor Policies Accreditation Policies s Professional Staff Pre-SV Conference Call

35 Roles and Responsibilities
Need solid foundational knowledge of Standards Review Self-Study Report & JRCERT Correspondence Understand Accreditation Process and SV Policies Consult w/ Chair (roles/assignments) Maintains Confidentiality Provide input to Chair Contribute to team’s collective findings (Gather Evidence, Assess each Obj., Determine compliance) Complete Expense Voucher and Peer Survey Review ROF for accuracy, contact staff if needed

36 Roles and Responsibilities – Chair specific
Interact with PD and Develop Agenda Communicate with Member(s) and Acts as Spokesperson on Visit Develop action plan for SV and coordinates roles w/ Member(s) Assure Confidentiality Synthesize Evidence Contact JRCERT Office for assistance Summarize Evidence, Compliance, Strengths, Improvements Complete RSVTF in AMS (Policy – 30 days) Complete Expense Voucher and Peer Survey Review ROF for accuracy, contact staff if needed

37 The Site Visit 12 wks 8-6 wks 4 wks 2 wks SITE VISIT 12 – weeks, assignment letter and Portal access to all materials 8-6 weeks – make travel arrangements… Program to make Hotel 4- weeks – Chair to send in agenda 2 weeks – Pre SV conference call w/ professional staff.

38 Initial Team Meeting Clarify any concerns regarding your role as a team member Familiarize yourself with program effectiveness concept Review agenda & determine potential questions for interview

39 Conducting a Successful Visit
Opening Session Reiterate Confidentiality Statement Explain Purpose Review/Revise Agenda Role of SVT (not the official report) Allow CEO or Chief Academic Officer to welcome you to Institution Meet with variety of stakeholders (PD, CC, FT/PT, CIs, RDA, Staff, Students, Alumni) Tour Campus Communicate Time Management is critical Do not compare to your program

40 Conducting a Successful Visit
Be objective: Your role is to observe, analyze, and report Listen more than you talk. Have a positive attitude and tone in the interviews; do not express views that could be interpreted as a bias about program content and outcomes. Remind those you interview that what you hear is confidential! Focus on important issues related to accreditation standards, avoid small problems. Be thorough, ask the same questions of many people to get a balanced view of the situation. The Chair’s willingness to communicate with the PD during the SV is very important. Misunderstandings can be corrected quickly and arrangements for additional information can be made sooner than later. Stay on schedule. Prepare as much of the RSVTF as possible on campus. (AMS – related). Reprinted w/ Permission: Planning Accreditation Board, SV Manual 2013

41 Interviews JRCERT Sample Questions (SV Resources) Establish Rapport
Group vs. Individual Evaluate Responses and Explore Further, if needed Remain Neutral Know When to Move On

42 Communication Verbal and Nonverbal Keep communication lines open
If question/concern arises during an interview, explore further with multiple people – Not an automatic citation Listen

43 Developing the RSVTF Begins Night 1 Collaborative Agreement
Explanatory Well-Organized Coherent

44 The RSVTF Is a legal document
Professional in presentation and format Complete Provides as much detail as necessary for areas of noncompliance, suggestions, &/or kudos. Is not prescriptive Avoids individual names, superlatives, and personal opinions Should be proofed and edited for typographical &/or grammatical errors and overall accuracy.

45 Writing Evidentiary Statements
Poor Example: 3.2 – The program does not follow the current curriculum. Better Example: 3.2 – The program’s current curriculum does not provide for assurance that students are receiving sectional anatomy instruction. Best Example: 3.2 – The program is not in compliance with Objective It has been determined that the program does not include any introductory knowledge to sectional anatomy as defined in the current American Society of Radiologic Technology (ASRT) curriculum – Human Structure and Function section. It is apparent that the program considers completion of the College’s Anatomy & Physiology I and II courses as having met this curricular requirement. The information provided in the program’s master plan of education, including the BIOL syllabi do not corroborate this.

46 Pre-Exit Summation Program decides who attends
Final opportunity to clarify any misconceptions No Surprises before Final Summation Thorough explanations of citations and/or suggestions Provide candid and constructive feedback Rationale What next – Accreditation Timelines

47 Final Exit Summation Reemphasize
SVT maintained confidentiality of all records Only report of site visit team’s findings Program has opportunity to clarify any negative findings upon receipt of official report of findings Timeframe (briefly) Thank the institutional and programmatic officials Strengths, Opportunities for Improvements, Noncompliance

48 Final Exit Summation Do not rush the summation
Maintain decorum and control of summation Emphasize to institutional officials that the full report has been thoroughly explained to the PD Emphasize that communication ceases with SVT Know when to say goodbye!

49 Wrap up and After Submit official RSVTF w/n 4 weeks (P. 11.600)(Chair)
Through the AMS Portal Include current Assessment plan - via to Any other backup - via to Expense Voucher - via to Itemized receipts No alcohol Tips = ≤20% Peer Evaluation – Surveymonkey Review Report of Findings for inaccuracies or misinterpretations

50 Always Remember … Contact the office for assistance. mail@jrcert.org

51 For supporting excellence in education
And your Continued Support of Programmatic Accreditation.

52 Accreditation Accreditation is the process of voluntary, external peer review in which a nongovernmental agency grants public recognition to an institution or specialized program of study that meets established qualifications and complies with educational standards, as determined through initial and subsequent periodic evaluations.

53 Types of Accreditation
Institutional Regional Accredit public and private nonprofits and degree-granting two- and four- year institutions National (Faith-related or Career-related) Accredit religiously affiliated and doctrinally based institutions, mainly nonprofit and degree-granting Accredit mainly for-profit , career-based, single purpose institutions , degree and non-degree Programmatic (specialized) Accredit specific programs, professions, and freestanding schools.

54

55

56 Assignment Letter

57 Assignment Letter

58 Travel Arrangements

59 Sample Agenda

60 Chicago City College – South Loop Radiologic Technology Program
SITE VISIT AGENDA Chicago City College – South Loop Radiologic Technology Program Chicago, Illinois February 15-16, 2016 SITE VISITORS: Abe Lincoln, M.Ed., R.T. ( R ) Mickey Mouse, M.S, R.T.(R)(CT) Team Chair Team Member Radiography Program Director Associate Professor Bossier Parish Community College Michigan County College Bossier City, LA Silo, MI Cell Phone: Cell Phone: 2/14/16 3:30 pm Pick up site visitors at airport Abe arrives on American Airlines Flight 2960 at 2:45 pm Mickey arrives on United Airlines Flight 452 at 3:15 pm

61 2/15/16 7:30 am Pick up Site Visitors at Hotel 8:00 am Introductory Meeting with Radiography Program Faculty and Other Administrative Personnel 8:30 am Campus Tour [Classroom(s), Laboratory, Faculty Offices, Library, and Student Services] 9:30 am Meet with Campus Admission’s Director and Registrar 10:00 am Meet with Program Personnel 11:00 am Meet with 1st Year Students 12:00 pm Lunch with Clinical Instructors 12:30 pm Individual Meetings with Clinical Instructors 1:30 pm Tour Clinical Facilities: Northwest Hospital and Craig T. Johnson Memorial Hospital 3:00 pm Return to Program and Meet with Program Officials 5:00 pm Return to Hotel

62 2/16/16 Day Two :30 am Pick up Site Visitors at Hotel 8:00 am Meet with 2nd Year Students 9:00 am Meet with Program Officials 10:00 am Telephone Conference Call to Veterans Administration Hospital and General Hospital 10:30 am Meet with Program Officials 12:00 pm Lunch/Work on Exit Summation 2:00 pm Exit summation with program director 2:30 pm Exit summation 3:15 pm Depart for Airport


Download ppt "SITE VISITOR WORKSHOP May 12, 2107 Chicago, IL"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google