Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Dermal Regeneration Using Multipotent Adult Stem Cells

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Dermal Regeneration Using Multipotent Adult Stem Cells"— Presentation transcript:

1 Dermal Regeneration Using Multipotent Adult Stem Cells
Miner Ross, MPH, MS3; Alexandra West, BA, MS4; Jessie Chan; Paul D. Marino, BS; Paul Lucas, PhD Department of Orthopaedic Surgery New York Medical College 11 February 2015

2 Background Full-thickness skin wounds are common in clinical practice
Caused by trauma, infection, immobilization, etc. Treatment ranges from serial dressing changes to split- or full-thickness skin grafts Healing produces a fibrotic, contracted scar There is an unmet need for treatment that is more cost-effective and efficacious

3 Multipotent Adult Stem Cells
Adult cells found in connective tissues Not transduced with any genes Distinct from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) Expand apparently indefinitely in cell culture Rat MASCs >120 doublings, human MASCs > 100 doublings Regenerate all three germ layers in vitro e.g. endothelial cells, keratinocytes, astrocytes, hepatocytes

4 Tissue Regeneration Cells are grown into biocompatible, biodegradable matrix Typically polyglycolic acid (PGA) mesh Cells are always implanted undifferentiated Observed regeneration in vivo: Cartilage Bone Peritoneum Vasculature

5 Hypothesis MASCs, when implanted in a biocompatible scaffold, will regenerate skin in full-thickness, non-healing wounds in adult rats.

6 Materials Rat MASCs transduced with green fluorescent protein (GFP) passage were grown into 4mm thick polyglycolic acid (PGA) felt matrix 2 full-thickness skin wounds 3cm in diameter were made to the level of the underlying musculature in g adult rats

7 Methods Each skin wound was assigned to one of three treatments:
Empty defect: 10 PGA alone : 10 PGA with MASCs: 10 All wounds were given standard care with Xeroform, Telfa, and VetRap Wounds were photographed at creation and every 7 days for 8 weeks

8 Data Obtained Defects were dissected at 8 weeks and processed for paraffin histology Samples were stained with H&E, Mallory- Heidenhain, or immunohistochemical markers Photographs were used to measure wound area changes over time

9 Wounds Empty MASCs Day Day 28

10 Results Empty defects and those treated with PGA alone contract into small, triangular scars Wounds treated with PGA + MASCs show regeneration of epidermis without contraction

11 Histology Empty defect Defect with MASCs

12 Immune Staining Red: keratinocytes Blue: nuclei Green: MASCs
Normal epidermis Empty defect Defect with MASCs

13 Immune Staining Yellow: endothelium Yellow: apocrine epithelium
Hair follicle within defect Microvasculature Apocrine gland within defect

14 Histology Control defects demonstrate only fibrotic scar tissue without dermal or epidermal elements MASC-treated wounds demonstrate regenerating dermal and epidermal structures viz. keratinocytes, fibroblasts, endothelium, smooth muscle, epidermal adnexa MASC origin of regenerating cells is established by elaboration of GFP

15 Conclusion Treatment of full-thickness skin wounds with MASCs results in regeneration of dermis and epidermis with decreased fibrosis and contraction Immunohistochemistry demonstrates that MASCs differentiate into cell types likely determined by local factors Future studies: larger animals, e.g. porcine

16

17 Isolation of MASCs Enzymatic digestion Primary culture Freeze-thaw
Allow progenitor cells to differentiate Pre-selected serum Freeze-thaw 7.5% DMSO slow freeze -80ºC MASCs survive

18 MASCs vs. MSCs Limited proliferation potential
Unlimited proliferation potential NCAM+, APPL2+, ITGB3+, PECAM1+, nestin+ Differentiation into phenotypes of all germ layers Limited proliferation potential NCAM-, APPL2-, ITGB3- , PECAM1-, nestin- Some mesodermal phenotypes

19 Wound Area

20 References 1. Schultz SS et al. Wound Repair Regen. 14(2):224-31, 2006
2. Paul A. Lucas et al. U.S. Patent No. 7,259,011 B2 Issued Aug. 21, 2007 3. Lucas PA et al. J. Surg. Res., 62: 4. Arriero M et al. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 287(4):F621-7, 2004 5. Sealy, R, et al. ORS, 2004 6. Lucas PA et al. J. Surg. Res., 62: 7. Taub PJ et al. Plastic Reconstructive Surgery 123(4): , 2009 8. Achor T et al. Tiss Engineering submitted 2015


Download ppt "Dermal Regeneration Using Multipotent Adult Stem Cells"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google