1. Jme McLean, MCP, MPH PolicyLink Kari Cruz, MPH Dana Keener Mast, PhD ICF International American Evaluation Association October 27, 2012 | Minneapolis, MN Developmental Evaluation in Practice: Lessons and Tips from an Evaluation of the Convergence Partnership

2. 2 icfi.com | “Developmental evaluation emerged in response to the need to support real-time learning in complex and emergent situations. Traditional forms of evaluation work well in situations where the progression from problem to solution can be laid out in a relatively clear sequence of steps (Gamble, 2008). However, initiatives with multiple stakeholders, high levels of innovation, fast paced decision- making, and areas of uncertainty require more flexible approaches (Patton, 2008).” Developmental Evaluation 201: A Practitioner’s Guide to Developmental Evaluation by Elizabeth Dozois, Marc Langlois, and Natasha Blanchet-Cohen. Developmental Evaluation

3. 3 icfi.com | Orient participants to Developmental Evaluation and the Convergence Partnership Describe how we applied Developmental Evaluation to the Convergence Partnership Share our lessons learned and tips for others Provide time for discussion and questions Session Objectives

4. 4 icfi.com | Applying Developmental Evaluation Approaches to the Convergence Partnership Kari Cruz, MPH Dana Keener Mast, PhD ICF International American Evaluation Association October 27, 2012 | Minneapolis, MN

5. 5 icfi.com | 1.DE’s focus is on social innovations where there is no accepted model (and might never be) for solving the problem. 2.Continuous Learning is intentionally embedded into the developmental evaluation process. 3.An emergent and adaptive evaluation design ensures that the evaluation has purpose and that it can respond in nimble ways to emerging issues and questions. 4.The role of the developmental evaluator is a strategic learning partner and facilitator, which reflects a different role for most evaluators and their clients. 5.The developmental evaluator brings a complex systems orientation to the evaluation. Five Characteristics of Developmental Evaluation 1 Evaluating Social Innovation by Hallie Preskill and Tanya Beer, 2012

6. 6 icfi.com | An integrated part of the intervention team Primarily elucidate the innovation and adaptation processes, track their implications and results, and facilitate ongoing, real-time data-based decision-making Developmental Evaluator’s Role

7. 7 icfi.com | The Convergence Partnership: Engages multiple partners from various sectors and fields Employs environmental and policy change to create communities of healthy people living in healthy places Seeks to create major systems changes within institutions, namely philanthropic and governmental institutions Adapt and innovate based on data and changing political and economic environment Why is Developmental Evaluation Right for Convergence Partnership?

8. 8 icfi.com | Evaluation Priorities 1.Demonstrate the progress and impact of the partnership Provide an objective perspective on progress Data and conclusions feed stakeholder reporting 2.Provide feedback to partners to inform strategic thinking and decision-making Evaluation to inform strategic discussions Continuous feedback loop needed

9. 9 icfi.com | Scope and budget Evaluation framework Data collection Timely reporting Interpretation of findings Applying Developmental Evaluation to Convergence Partnership

10. 10 icfi.com | Scope prioritizes rapid data collection in priority areas noting progress and outcomes Budget ceiling with set deliverables forecasted, then updated Room for emergent work, which is negotiated Lesson learned: Build in the necessary time to negotiate emergent work Clear communication and trust go a long way in uncertain budget circumstances Scope and Budget

11. 11 icfi.com | Identified key areas where the partnership expects to affect change Developed evaluation questions, indicators, and priority outcomes covering these areas Evaluation Framework

12. 12 icfi.com | 1.Increased intellectual capacity (skill building, knowledge)* 2.New/improved multi-field partnerships* 3.Changes in institutional practices* 4.Leveraged resources* 5.New/improved policies or programs* *Equity is a cross-cutting aspect that may or may not be reflected in any one of these outcomes Evaluation Priority Outcomes

13. 13 icfi.com | Evaluation Framework cont. Lesson learned: Identify what stakeholders want to know and where they expect to see results Use a wide lens

14. 14 icfi.com | Systematic and on-going –Attend key meetings –Monthly interviews with program staff (or as needed) –Surveys of participants at meetings, trainings, etc. –Align reporting mechanisms for grant funded initiatives Emergent –Key informant interviews at critical junctures (snowball sampling) –Document review –Others Lesson learned: Data collection is also strategic Data Collection

15. 15 icfi.com | Sensemaking –Stage 1 – provide data summaries –Stage 2 – interpret data with key stakeholders Lesson Learned Interpretation cannot be done in isolation from stakeholders Interpretation of Findings

16. 16 icfi.com | Briefer reporting Participation and direct communication at standing monthly partner meeting, staff meetings, etc. Lesson learned: Timely reporting equates to reporting at opportune times (e.g. standing meetings) Anticipate or identify decision making needs Semi-annual reports not enough Timely Reporting

17. 17 icfi.com | Change in scope and audience Change our evaluation style, interaction, and dynamics with stakeholders Defining boundaries of evaluation Resource limitations Uncertainty Key Challenges

18. 18 icfi.com | Resources

19. 19 icfi.com | Our Contact Information: Jme McLean jme@policylink.org Kari Cruz Kari.Cruz@icfi.com Dana Keener Mast Dana.KeenerMast@icfi.com Questions, ideas, or feedback?