1. ILC Detector Design D_R/R_1 FJPPL Project Application Akiya Miyamoto KEK FJPPL Workshop at Tsukuba 20-21 May, 2009

2. R&D Goal Japan-France collaboration on ILC detector R&D: 2 Akiya Miyamoto, KEK FJPPL Workshop, 20-21 May 2009, Tsukuba  Detector Design (ILD)  PFA Studies  GRID use (KEK-IN2P3)  Prototyping Ultra Segmented Calorimeter 2007-2008: “A common R&D on the new generation detector for the ILC” 2009- : “ILC Detector Design”  Detector design (ILD), including MDI Integration  PFA improvements with realistic models  Prototyping Ultra Segmented Calorimeter  ILD LOI (March 2009)  2012 ILC proposal

3. ILC roadmap and Detector Plan 3 Akiya Miyamoto, KEK FJPPL Workshop, 20-21 May 2009, Tsukuba Detector (Sync. w. Acc.) Accelerator B.Barish TILC09 LOI & Evaluation TDR Technology development and technical design

4. ILD Optimization Procedure 4 Akiya Miyamoto, KEK FJPPL Workshop, 20-21 May 2009, Tsukuba Whizard Physsim StdHep MOKKA Jupiter LCIO Marlin Sattelites LCIO DST and Analysis LDCGLD StdHep: Same generator data LCIO: Common IO format GLDPrim/LDCPrim: Similar detector model LCIO helps to collaborative works for detector optimization Software interoperativity

5. GLDPrim(Jupiter) – LDCPrim(Mokka) 5 Akiya Miyamoto, KEK FJPPL Workshop, 20-21 May 2009, Tsukuba LDCPrim(Mokka+Pandora) is better than GLDPrim(Jupiter+Sattelites) by 15~30%. Possible source:   r  (IT) 4  m(LDCPrim)  10  m(GLDPrim)  Silicon External Tracker in Mokka 3x10 -5 Sub-detector technology is more important than geometry 4m4m

6. Optimization by PFA 6 Akiya Miyamoto, KEK FJPPL Workshop, 20-21 May 2009, Tsukuba Comparison of detector models by PFA : Jet Energy Resolution LDC GLD’/LDC’ GLD In terms of the jet energy resolution: LDC≈GLD’/LDC’≈GLD

7. Optimization by Benchmark Process 7 Akiya Miyamoto, KEK FJPPL Workshop, 20-21 May 2009, Tsukuba Using several detector models, performance to separate W/Z in jet mode have been studied using SUSY processes by Taikan Suehara No significant differences are seen

8. Benchmark : 500 GeV  pair Only significant difference among detector models found for  full reconstruction, example in              For reconstruction of both g from  0    Smaller segmentation (5x5mm 2 ) and larger radius advantageous  Impact on physics sensitivity less pronounced Jupiter Mokka Jupiter Mokka Akiya Miyamoto, KEK 8 FJPPL Workshop, 20-21 May 2009, Tsukuba

9. ILD Design 9 Akiya Miyamoto, KEK FJPPL Workshop, 20-21 May 2009, Tsukuba 3x Dbl. Layer VTX Support of BP/VTX/SIT Forward Component Box support option B=3.5T, R ECAL =1.85 m

10. ILD MDI/Integration issues 10 Akiya Miyamoto, KEK FJPPL Workshop, 20-21 May 2009, Tsukuba Development of ILD technical design is the major task of coming years. Issues includes  Design of coil, cryostat, and structure  Push-pull scenario  Detector integration and maintenance LLR and KEK members are heavily involved in MDI and Integration of ILD. The issues will be studied in this program

11. GRID Two Vos have been used:  CALICE-VO: Test beam data analysis and MC. Standard data processing in GRID  ILC-VO: Needs huge CPU resources for the studies. Available only on GRID Standard MC samples ( ~ 50TB) are on GRID for sharing Status:  A typical data transfer rate from IN2P3/DESY to KEK: ~ 200kB/sec/port a frequent time for transfer of ~ 2GB: Cured by removing a time out at IN2P3  Overhead of catalog access ILD DST: many small size DSTs, limited by CPU time for a MC job. MC and DST production at DESY/IN2P3  Merge DSTs to create a large size file, then replicated to KEK 11 Akiya Miyamoto, KEK FJPPL Workshop, 20-21 May 2009, Tsukuba

12. A typical GRID performance 12 Akiya Miyamoto, KEK FJPPL Workshop, 20-21 May 2009, Tsukuba File transfer: IN2P3  Kobe, 184 files/210 GB in 13 hours - part of ILD LOI study, in Dec. 2008 - 10 ports/job Pedestal in transfer time ~ 20~60sec.  < 100MB is not effective. Instantaneous transfer rate: average 4 MB/sec, Max. 10 MB/sec  not great, but has been used for real works successfully Data size vs TimeTransfer rate During Dec. ‘08 to Feb. ’09, O(10TB) data have been exchanged through GRID. It was crucial for the successful LOI studies. During Dec. ‘08 to Feb. ’09, O(10TB) data have been exchanged through GRID. It was crucial for the successful LOI studies.

13. Ultra Segmented Calorimeter ILD needs ultra segmented calorimeter for high performance jet energy measurement by PFA. Two types of ECAL technologies  Tungsten-Scintillator read by MPPC : Japan-Korea  Tungsten-Silicon PIN diodes sampling calorimeter: French-Korea-UK-Czech R&D Issues  mechanics, VFE electronics, DAQ, analysis, sensors, … R&D: pursued by CALICE  Collaboration: 16 countries, 53 inst., 300 phys./eng. for ECAL/HCAL  Common resources DAQ, VFE electronics, test beam infra., test beam program 13 Akiya Miyamoto, KEK FJPPL Workshop, 20-21 May 2009, Tsukuba

14. W/Scintillator Beam Test Sep. ‘09 at FNAL.  Establish feasibility of Sc. ECAL + Analog HCAL   0 reconstruction 14 Akiya Miyamoto, KEK FJPPL Workshop, 20-21 May 2009, Tsukuba ScECAL module W(3mm t )+Extruded Sc(3.5mm t ) 20x20x25cm 3 read by MPPC 72 strips x 30 layers = 2160 ch.

15.  0 reconstruction by ScECAL p- beam(16, 25, 32 GeV) was injected to Iron target and  0 ’s were reconstructed from two  ’s. 15 Akiya Miyamoto, KEK FJPPL Workshop, 20-21 May 2009, Tsukuba 00 2  clusters in ScECAL 2  mass Preliminary

16. ScECAL next step New beam test is in progress ( 20 April to 28 May @ FNAL ), for  More energy points of  + and  - for linearity and resolution studies  More  0  Tilt angle scan  Higher energies Tests with more realistic prototype of ECAL will follow 16 Akiya Miyamoto, KEK FJPPL Workshop, 20-21 May 2009, Tsukuba ScECAL

17. 200mm 360mm 2 test-beam periods at Fermilab May & July CALICE SiW-ECAL + AHCAL + tail catcher detectors Electrons: 1-30 GeV, Pions: 1-60 GeV Scanned beam over detector surface and detector angles ~17M events collected Analysis of data has started SiW-ECAL “Physics prototype” in testbeam at Fermilab, 2008 17 Akiya Miyamoto, KEK FJPPL Workshop, 20-21 May 2009, Tsukuba

18. Towards the “EUDET” prototype Design guide lines  Test technological solutions for ILD ECAL  Mechanical structure close to ILD detector module  Partially instrumented  Readout chips integrated within the detector volume 18 Akiya Miyamoto, KEK FJPPL Workshop, 20-21 May 2009, Tsukuba 550 mm 1510 mm Composite Part with metallic inserts (15 mm thick) Thickness : 1 mm 15 layers 1562mm 940mm ILD ECAL module SiW ECAL CALICE EUDET module

19. Progress towards the mechanical structure of an ILD detector module  “Demonstrator module” has been produced to test production of alveolar structure Less layers than EUDET module 380mm 1300mm 3 layers ECAL mechanics 550 mm 1510 mm Composite Part with metallic inserts (15 mm thick) Thickness : 1 mm SiW ECAL CALICE EUDET module Demonstrator module Akiya Miyamoto, KEK 19 FJPPL Workshop, 20-21 May 2009, Tsukuba

20. Demonstrator module Sucessfully produced and mechanical measurements underway Akiya Miyamoto, KEK 20 FJPPL Workshop, 20-21 May 2009, Tsukuba

21. First 5 samples of 9x9cm 2 wafers arrived from Hammamatsu  Tests of electrical properties underway Development of silicon wafer design being pursued with OnSemi company - e.g. segmented wafer guard-rings to reduce cross-talk Continuing development of readout chip (“SkiRoc2”) and PCB which will support silicon wafers within the EUDET module Thermal studies of heat extraction from FE chips also underway Si sensors and Electronics 21 Akiya Miyamoto, KEK FJPPL Workshop, 20-21 May 2009, Tsukuba 9cm Hamamatsu 5x5mm 2 sensors OnSemi

22. Conclusion The Japanese-French collaboration in D_R/D_1 has been very useful (mandatory in some case )  To pursue common work on simulation, optimization, and benchmarking of ILD detector concept.  To optimise the use of manpower and money for the detector R&D in test beam  To develop an ECAL for the PFA based detector It will be mandatory for the development of the ILD technical design in the ILC TDR era.  Study and design of detector integration  Complete PFA study of strip ScECAL and studies with more realistic model.  Proto-typing of ultra segmented calorimeter 22 Akiya Miyamoto, KEK FJPPL Workshop, 20-21 May 2009, Tsukuba

23. 23 Akiya Miyamoto, KEK FJPPL Workshop, 20-21 May 2009, Tsukuba Backup Slides

24. ILD Benchmarking tau, SUSY 24 Akiya Miyamoto, KEK FJPPL Workshop, 20-21 May 2009, Tsukuba

25. GLD