2. INTRODUCTIONS AND OVERVIEW

3. 2 Participants will: Understand vision, roles of partners and work to date in Evidence2Success Review the results of the YES data analysis and the shared priorities identified by the community board Understand fund-mapping data collection methodology Review fund-mapping data analysis and identify opportunities to redirect resources toward tested, effective programs Define next steps for sharing and using data in the strategic financing process Goals and Objectives

4. 3 Achieve better well-being outcomes for all children and youth (birth to age 18) by decreasing risk and improving protection Use the best available local data on children’s strengths and needs to determine well-being priorities and track progress Shift a percentage of spending to prevention and early intervention Invest in a balanced portfolio of tested, effective (evidence-based) programs to reach all eligible children and youth Create strong partnership and shared accountability among schools, public systems, residents and families The Vision Behind Evidence2Success

5. 4 The Evidence2Success Framework Partnership Strategic Use of Data Strategic Financing Tested, Effective Programs (TEPs) Performance Measures

6. In our Evidence2Success effort so far, we have: Convened and oriented the community board Administered the Youth Experience Survey Identified priority outcomes, risk factors and protective factors 5 Our Work to Date

7. 6 Your Agency and the Community Board Service Providers and Teachers in the Partner Neighborhoods Civic leaders Residents of Partner Neighbor- hoods Public System Decision Makers Community Board Participating Systems/Agencies: School District Child Welfare Public Health Juvenile Justice LIST OTHERS From Your Agency:

8. 7 Strategic Financing: An Integral Part of Evidence2Success 5 IMPLEMENT AND EVALUATE Implement tested, effective programs and monitor performance Finalize plans and train providers Engage the community in recruitment Celebrate successes Track progress and make changes as needed 7 1 GET STARTED Engage city, public system, school, neighborhood and community leaders Designate a coordinator Engage community board Conduct Youth Experience Survey 2 GET ORGANIZED Build all partners’ capacity to engage in joint decision making Orient community board Educate and inform community and systems Begin fund mapping Expand community board 3 DEVELOP COMMUNITY PROFILE Produce a “big picture” view of child well-being Work to interpret data Develop broad strategy focused on priority outcomes, risk factors and protective factors Identify opportunities to shift funding 4 CREATE A PLAN Select tested, effective programs to advance broad strategy Develop short- and long-term action plans Develop financing strategies to support tested, effective programs Share action plan Identify service providers

9. 8 How the Fund-Mapping Process Works Finance Lead Provides Fund-Map Link to Each Agency Agencies Enter Spending and Program Data Finance Lead Can Easily Run Analyses of Cross-Agency Spending

10. 9 Fund Mapping Provides a Foundation for Collaborative Financing Plan… Partner Agency Review for Redirection Opportunities The foundation for a collaborative strategic financing plan to support shared priorities: Prioritized programs Progress toward outcomes

11. Youth Experience Survey Data and Shared Priorities

12. 11 Risk factors are predictors of problem outcomes Protective factors buffer against risk factors The Youth Experiences Survey (YES) Measures Youth Well-Being Outcomes, Risk Factors and Protective Factors Many negative youth outcomes share certain risk factors in common. YES data help to create a portrait: a starting point for setting priorities

13. 12 YES Data Collection Methodology

14. 13 YES Well-Being Outcomes

15. 14 YES Risk Factors

16. 15 YES Protective Factors

17. 16 Shared Priorities Identified by the Community Board

18. Tested, Effective Programs* Good Behavior Game Olweus Bullying Prevention Program Guiding Good Choices Reading Recovery Coping Power Program Multi-Systemic Therapy Children’s priority needs and strengths can be matched to a database of proven programs Academic Failure Family management Antisocial Peers Favorable Attitudes Towards Antisocial Behavior Low Perceived Risk of Drug Use Elevated Risk Factors * Random assignment evaluation or multiple comparison group evaluations

19. How do the priorities selected by the community board align with the current priorities of our agency? How could the collaborative work to implement tested, effective programs in Evidence2Success contribute to progress toward our priorities? 18 Discussion

20. FUND-MAPPING DATA ANALYSIS

21. 20 Which of our agency’s investments are most aligned with the priorities identified by the community board in the YES data? Are we getting what we want from the funding that we are spending? –What do we know about the effectiveness of services? –What are we spending on prevention versus remedial services? Where are there opportunities to redirect a portion of current resources (staffing or dollars) to invest in prevention and tested, effective programs and achieve better outcomes? Fund-Mapping Data: Key Questions to Consider

22. 21 Fund-Mapping Data Collection Methodology

23. 22 Community-Based Contracts Spending by Funding Source Funding SourceTotal Spent Key Funding Streams Federal$2,442,674 TANF Funding, Title IV-B Promoting Safe & Stable Families State$2,128,219State Delinquency Services Grant City$500,550CDBG County$178,557County Budget Allocation for Human Services Grand Total$5,250,000

24. 23 Key Funding Sources Supporting Community-Based Contracts

25. 24 Community-Based Contracted Spending by Outcome Area

26. 25 Community-Based Contracted Spending by Outcome Area Outcomes TargetedTotal SpentLargest Contracts Positive Behavior$2,000,000 Youth Services Center, $1.1M, Outreach and tracking South Side Collaborative, $650K, Treatment Foster Care Oregon Multiple Outcomes$1,250,000 Better Futures, $699K, Life skills and aftercare FRIENDS, $400K, Diversion Emotional Well-Being$750,000 Health Partners, $300K, Family Counseling The Family Spot, $175K, Trauma-Informed Care Positive Relationships$650,000 The Family Spot, $125K, Strengthening Families YMCA, $125K, Mentoring Educational Skills & Attainment $350,000 FRIENDS, $125K, GED prep The Family Spot, $75K, Tutoring Physical Health$250,000 Health Partners, $150K, Adolescent health clinic YMCA, $65K, At-risk youth sports Total Spent$5,250,000

27. 26 Community-Based Contract Spending by Level of Intervention

28. 27 Community-Based Contract Spending by Level of Intervention Level of InterventionTotal SpentLargest Contracts Remediation$3,250,000 Youth Services Center, $1.1M, Outreach and tracking South Side Collaborative, $650K, TFCO Indicated Prevention$1,250,000 Better Futures, $699K, Lifeskills and aftercare FRIENDS, $400K, Diversion Universal Prevention$500,000 Health Partners, $150K, Adolescent Health Clinic PR Partners, $125K, Healthy Teen Campaign Selected Prevention$250,000 The Family Sport, $125K, Strengthening Families YMCA, $125K, Mentoring Total Spent$5,250,000

29. 28 Costs for Community-Based Program Models with No Information on or Low Evidence of Effectiveness Provider Services Provided Total Contracted Amount Evidence of Effectiveness Cost per Child YMCAMentoring$125,000 Data mixed/inconcl usive $833 Youth Services Center Outreach and Tracking $1,100,000 No data on effectiveness $34,965

30. Considering Tested, Effective Alternatives Outcome Area Current Programs Cost Per Child Blueprints Programs Cost Per Child Positive Behavior Outreach and Tracking $34,965 Multisystemic Therapy $24,853 Parent Management Training $686 29

31. 30 Agency-Specific Data Slides

32. 31 $10,000,000 = The total funds mapped for your agency –$5.25 Million – Contracts –$4.75 Million – Direct Agency Spending $300,000 = 3% of mapped funds Redirecting 3% would allow you to: –Invest in tested, effective programs to serve 5,800 children d youth Redirection Example: What Could Redirection of 3% of Funds We Have Mapped Buy? This is NOT the total budget—just select areas of budget most aligned with Evidence2Success

33. Redirection Example: What Could Redirection of 3% of Mapped Funds Buy for Children and Families in Our Community? Target Group Age # Children, Youth & Families OutcomesProgramUnit Cost Total Investment (per year) 3 - 4 2513 3 – 4 yo slots in city Reduce conduct problems, increase emotional regulation, and prosocial peers Incredible Years – Teacher Classroom $61$153,300 5 -113,300 All School District K-5 Reduced violence, delinquency and criminal behavior, substance use, and sexual risk behaviors Life Skills Training $34$112,200 12 - 1850 Youth & Parents Involved with Juvenile Justice Reduced alcohol use, delinquency and criminal behavior, depression and illicit drug use Parent Management Training $686$34,300 Source for unit cost: Incredible years – Blueprints, Life Skills – Blueprints, Parent Management Training - Washington State Institute For Public Policy cost-benefit analysis. http://www.wsipp.wa.gov/BenefitCost/ProgramPdf/544/Parent-Management-Training-Oregon-model-Treatment-populationhttp://www.wsipp.wa.gov/BenefitCost/ProgramPdf/544/Parent-Management-Training-Oregon-model-Treatment-population

34. 33 Questions

35. DISCUSSION

36. 35 Which of our agency’s investments are most aligned with the priorities identified by the community board from the YES data? Are we getting what we want from the funding that we are spending? –What do we know about the effectiveness of services? –What are we spending on prevention versus remedial services? Where are there opportunities to redirect a portion of current resources (staffing or dollars) to achieve better outcomes? Fund-Mapping Data: Key Questions to Consider

37. 36 Continue to share agency-level data with individual fund mapping partners Draft cross-agency analysis to present to strategic financing committee –Vet that analysis with stakeholder(s) from agency Strategic Financing Committee will work to determine the financing strategies and oversee implementation of those strategies Next Steps