1. Comparison of operator radiation exposure with optimized radiation protection devices during coronary angiograms and ad hoc percutaneous coronary interventions by radial and femoral routes by Camille Brasselet, Thierry Blanpain, Sophie Tassan-Mangina, Alain Deschildre, Sébastien Duval, Fabien Vitry, Nathalie Gaillot-Petit, Jean Paul Clément, and Damien Metz EHJ Volume 29(1):63-70 January 1, 2008 Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2007. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

2. Radiation protection devices for operators, i.e. low leaded flaps and leaded glass (0.5 mm leaded-equivalent for each) (A). Camille Brasselet et al. Eur Heart J 2008;29:63-70 Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2007. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

3. Operator radiation exposure, patient radiation exposure, fluoroscopy time, and procedural duration according to arterial routes and procedures. Camille Brasselet et al. Eur Heart J 2008;29:63-70 Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2007. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

4. Relationship between operator and patient radiation exposure according to arterial routes and procedures. Camille Brasselet et al. Eur Heart J 2008;29:63-70 Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2007. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

5. Angulation response of the dosimeter. Camille Brasselet et al. Eur Heart J 2008;29:63-70 Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2007. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org