Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts Budget and Activity Summary Slides with budget numbers and FTE summaries/activity for FY14 through FY16.

Published byDonna Blake Modified over 7 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "1 CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts Budget and Activity Summary Slides with budget numbers and FTE summaries/activity for FY14 through FY16."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts Budget and Activity Summary Slides with budget numbers and FTE summaries/activity for FY14 through FY16.

2 CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts 2 Main theme for Argonne HEP 2 ENABLE Approach for Argonne HEP in short: Actions and activities are driven by “ enabling ” future of HEP Enable : Enabling US participation in ATLAS/LHC Developing new “ technologies ” for accelerators & detectors to enable experiments Interact with & use material science, photon science, computing, nano scale, accelerator expertise at Argonne to do this ( interact with other sciences); enable new technologies Transfer HEP expertise to other fields ( detector & accelerator expertise for example) Direction for future of field ( theory & roles in Snowmass 2013) Connections & collaboration with/resource for universities Connections to industry with new technologies Uniqueness: Basic development of new tools like: sensors, detectors, acceleration methods, computing …… driven by HEP needs & use non-HEP expertise at Argonne UNIQUE future HEP and do it in a way that is Reach out to expertise and technologies that other divisions at Argonne have; do it so both benefit and at some point pay for it

3 CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts 3 Budget & people in group Year/k$FY11FY12FY13FY14FY15FY16 KA231,2001,3901,4251,400 Early Career500 For beyond FY14 assume for each year ( Scenario A) For this budget: Get this

4 CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts 4 Evolution of program for different funding scenarios FY13 projected to end of the year; copy of spreadsheet that you have FY13 support (Actual)Cosmic Frontier - experimental research funding (KA230102) Personnel Support from DOE/HEP (in FTEs) Select Activity:SPTDESVERITASCTASelect TOTAL Permanent Ph.D.2.101.300.900.100.00 4.4 Temporary Ph.D.1.001.501.000.00 3.5 Graduate Students0.001.000.00 1.0 Engineer / Computing Professional0.00 0.0 Administrative / Technician0.00 0.0 Other0.00 0.0 DOE/HEP Funding including overhead (per activity): SWF(Actual, in $) 610,030 625,417 381,899 29,957 - - 1,647,303 M&S (Actual, in $) 153,500 16,000 5,000 - - - 174,500 Travel (actual, in $) 12,000 25,000 35,000 - - - 72,000 TOTAL 775,530 666,417 421,899 29,957 - - 1,893,803 Just for information. Show same numbers but in slightly different arrangement Note: Funding for FY13 was 1,425+500 = 1,925k$ Number in spreadsheets: 1,894k$ was estimated actual in August 2013

5 CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts 5 Scenario C -- wish list Evolution of program for different funding scenarios Contains Early Career Assumes SPT-3G will be next ANL investment thru LDRD (FY13- FY15); $3.6M Support for Computational Cosmology at ~50% level of group. Other sources for funding: Theory, ASCR, Computing, etc Assume VERITAS program transitions into CTA & CTA will be part of US HEP program DES analysis & development of OH suppression and LSST New group for DOE HEP CF

6 CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts 6 Scenario C -- wish list Evolution of program for different funding scenarios Summary of Scenario C Evolution of total request

7 CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts 7 Evolution of program for different funding scenarios Scenario A Phase out VERITAS/CTA program FY14= FY13-2% FY16=FY15=FY14= $1.9M/yr including Early Career How did we arrive at choices that we made? Need to make choices/priorities Assume an outcome of P5/where program is going –- our best guess Fold in what we think is best for US HEP & Argonne Where will Argonne contribution have largest impact Do not simply spread pain i.e. do not reduce every program Keep programs at sustainable level Take into account Early Career award –- enable it However: We are a national lab Need to support national program Feedback from this review Support HEP direction from P5 roadmap

8 CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts 8 Evolution of program for different funding scenarios Scenario A Phase out VERITAS/CTA FY14= FY13-2% FY16=FY15=FY14= $1.9M/yr including Early Career Assume SPT-3G Reduce funding from Scenario C. More other sources for funding: Theory, ASCR, Computing, etc DES analysis & development of OH suppression and LSST

9 CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts 9 Evolution of program for different funding scenarios Scenario A FY14= FY13-2% FY16=FY15=FY14= $1.9M/yr including Early Career Summary all years:

10 CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts 10 Questions & Comments….. Postdocs -- numbers Students Staff

11 CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts 11 THE END

12 CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts 12 Backup Slides

13 CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts 13 Facilities ( within division) 13 Electronics: Mechanical: All groups are in the HEP division  Group Resources (14 people, 12.5 FTEs) : –( engineers to techs) –ASICS at Fermilab Serves several divisions; In FY12: ~50% work for HEP  Group Resources (7 people) : –Engineers to techs ( From ATLAS @LHC, Nova, telescopes to DES support) Unique capabilities HEP only  Division expanded into more space; added all of Building 360 ( 2 floors, labs, conference rooms + offices) Space: 23K sq ft buildings + labs Close interactions: science  engineering 2007  2009 Upgrade of lab 2011  2012 AWA extension

14 Vision for Argonne HEP:  We think investments in building strong connections both inside and outside HEP will have the strongest impact in revitalizing HEP.  More efficient research –Increase collaboration with and among universities Universities take better advantage of the lab infrastructure (beyond HEP!) Lab gains collaboration and broadens their portfolio of expertise  Better serve the young people in HEP –Give opportunities to students of gaining experience in Hardware, computing Other Frontier areas –Opportunities to connect with industry  HEP should better integrate into other scientific/technical community as well as industry. –Work across disciplines -- multidisciplinary. –Leads to better understanding and support for HEP  Promoting more collaboration in diverse areas: this will lead, ultimately, to better communication and coherence in the HEP and the science community. CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts 14

15 CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts 15 Scenario C -- wish list Evolution of program for different funding scenarios FY14 - Scenario CCosmic Frontier - experimental research funding (KA230102) (FY14=FY13 + new requests prioritized) Personnel Support from DOE/HEP (in FTEs) Select Activity:SPTDESVERITAS Computational CosmologyCTATOTAL Permanent Ph.D.1.601.300.900.580.104.5 Temporary Ph.D.1.00 0.830.003.8 Graduate Students1.00 0.00 2.0 Engineer / Computing Professional0.00 0.0 Administrative / Technician0.00 0.00.00 0.0 Other0.00 0.0 DOE/HEP Funding including overhead (per activity): SWF(Actual, in $)564,357587,619392,210330,23930,7661,905,190 M&S (Actual, in $)297,00020,000000317,000 Travel (actual, in $)40,00030,00060,00025,0000155,000 TOTAL901,357637,619452,210355,23930,7662,377,190 FY15 - Scenario CCosmic Frontier - experimental research funding (KA230102) (FY14=FY13 + new requests prioritized) Personnel Support from DOE/HEP (in FTEs) Activity:SPTDESVERITAS Computational CosmologyCTATOTAL Permanent Ph.D.1.601.300.801.000.204.9 Temporary Ph.D.1.00 2.000.005.0 Graduate Students1.00 0.00 2.0 Engineer / Computing Professional0.00 0.0 Administrative / Technician0.00 0.0 Other0.00 0.0 DOE/HEP Funding including overhead (per activity): SWF(Planned, in $)579,594603,485371,203649,08563,1932,266,559 M&S (Planned, in $)292,00020,000000312,000 Travel (Planned, in $)40,00030,00060,00025,0000155,000 TOTAL911,594653,485431,203674,08563,1932,733,559

16 CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts 16 Evolution of program for different funding scenarios Scenario A All reduction taken in VERITAS/CTA FY14 - Scenario ACosmic Frontier - experimental research funding (KA230102) (FY13-2%) Personnel Support from DOE/HEP (in FTEs) Select Activity:SPTDESVERITAS Computational CosmologyCTATOTAL Permanent Ph.D.1.601.300.600.300.103.9 Temporary Ph.D.1.00 0.900.400.003.3 Graduate Students0.00 0.0 Engineer / Computing Professional0.00 0.0 Administrative / Technician0.00 0.0 Other0.00 0.0 DOE/HEP Funding including overhead (per activity): SWF(Actual, in $) 504,791 528,053 288,381 166,542 30,766 1,518,533 M&S (Actual, in $) 282,000 10,000 - - - 292,000 Travel (actual, in $) 35,000 15,000 25,000 - 90,000 TOTAL 821,791 553,053 303,381 191,542 30,766 1,900,533 FY15 - Scenario ACosmic Frontier - experimental research funding (KA230102) (FY15=FY14) Personnel Support from DOE/HEP (in FTEs) Activity:SPTDESVERITAS Computational CosmologyCTATOTAL Permanent Ph.D.1.601.300.000.670.103.7 Temporary Ph.D.1.00 0.001.000.003.0 Graduate Students0.00 0.0 Engineer / Computing Professional0.00 0.0 Administrative / Technician0.00 0.0 Other0.00 0.0 DOE/HEP Funding including overhead (per activity): SWF(Planned, in $) 518,420 542,310 - 396,268 31,596 1,488,595 M&S (Planned, in $) 292,000 20,000 - - - 312,000 Travel (Planned, in $) 40,000 30,000 25,000 - 95,000 TOTAL 850,420 592,310 - 421,268 31,596 1,895,595 Fix budget: FY14= FY13-2% FY16=FY15=FY14

17 CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts 17

Download ppt "1 CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts Budget and Activity Summary Slides with budget numbers and FTE summaries/activity for FY14 through FY16."

Similar presentations

Demonstrating the Legal Sustainability of Effective STEM Diversity Programs Wanda E. Ward Ph.D., Discussant Sr. Advisor to the Director Office of the Director.

Demonstrating the Legal Sustainability of Effective STEM Diversity Programs Wanda E. Ward Ph.D., Discussant Sr. Advisor to the Director Office of the Director.
Oklahoma Center for High Energy Physics A DOE EPSCoR Proposal Submitted by a consortium of University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma State University, Langston.

Oklahoma Center for High Energy Physics A DOE EPSCoR Proposal Submitted by a consortium of University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma State University, Langston.
Presentation at WebEx Meeting June 15, 2012 1.  Context  Challenge  Anticipated Outcomes  Framework  Timeline & Guidance  Comment and Questions.

Presentation at WebEx Meeting June 15,  Context  Challenge  Anticipated Outcomes  Framework  Timeline & Guidance  Comment and Questions.
1 Performance Assessment An NSF Perspective MJ Suiter Budget, Finance and Awards NSF.

1 Performance Assessment An NSF Perspective MJ Suiter Budget, Finance and Awards NSF.
“NSF’s Division of Undergraduate Education: Funding Opportunities for Community Colleges” CUR November 18, 2011 Eun-Woo Chang Montgomery College.

“NSF’s Division of Undergraduate Education: Funding Opportunities for Community Colleges” CUR November 18, 2011 Eun-Woo Chang Montgomery College.
I/UCRC Annual Directors’ Meeting January 8, 2009 Anne Emig Supplemental Funding Options at NSF: Supporting International Research & Education.

I/UCRC Annual Directors’ Meeting January 8, 2009 Anne Emig Supplemental Funding Options at NSF: Supporting International Research & Education.
Maury Goodman for Harry Weerts Leader, ANL-HEP Group NO A Collaboration Meeting Welcome 8 July 2013 Argonne National Lab.

Maury Goodman for Harry Weerts Leader, ANL-HEP Group NO A Collaboration Meeting Welcome 8 July 2013 Argonne National Lab.
Science of Science and Innovation Policy (SciSIP) Presentation to: SBE Advisory Committee By: Dr. Kaye Husbands Fealing National Science Foundation November.

Science of Science and Innovation Policy (SciSIP) Presentation to: SBE Advisory Committee By: Dr. Kaye Husbands Fealing National Science Foundation November.
Meeting Expectations Gary Jedlovec Purpose of review SPoRT Mission and Vision Role of Science Advisory Committee Charge to Committee members transitioning.

Meeting Expectations Gary Jedlovec Purpose of review SPoRT Mission and Vision Role of Science Advisory Committee Charge to Committee members transitioning.
1 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Amber Boehnlein October 18, 2011.

1 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Amber Boehnlein October 18, 2011.
Funding Opportunities NSF Division of Undergraduate Education North Dakota State University June 6, 2005.

Funding Opportunities NSF Division of Undergraduate Education North Dakota State University June 6, 2005.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Dr. Raymond L. Orbach Under Secretary for Science U.S. Department.

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Dr. Raymond L. Orbach Under Secretary for Science U.S. Department.
Interdisciplinary and Interagency Cooperation in High Energy Physics Barry Barish BPA 5-Nov-02.

Interdisciplinary and Interagency Cooperation in High Energy Physics Barry Barish BPA 5-Nov-02.
NSF Office of Integrative Activities Major Research Instrumentation Program November 2007 Major Research Instrumentation EPSCoR PI Meeting November 6-9,

NSF Office of Integrative Activities Major Research Instrumentation Program November 2007 Major Research Instrumentation EPSCoR PI Meeting November 6-9,
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Kathy Yelick Associate Laboratory Director for Computing Sciences.

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Kathy Yelick Associate Laboratory Director for Computing Sciences.
Serving MERLOT on Your Campus Gerry Hanley California State University and MERLOT Seminars on Academic Computing August 7, 2002 Snowmass CO Copyright Gerard.

Serving MERLOT on Your Campus Gerry Hanley California State University and MERLOT Seminars on Academic Computing August 7, 2002 Snowmass CO Copyright Gerard.
October 24, 2000Milestones, Funding of USCMS S&C Matthias Kasemann1 US CMS Software and Computing Milestones and Funding Profiles Matthias Kasemann Fermilab.

October 24, 2000Milestones, Funding of USCMS S&C Matthias Kasemann1 US CMS Software and Computing Milestones and Funding Profiles Matthias Kasemann Fermilab.
M. Bardeen, Homestake Feb. 2006 Lessons We Have Learned. Marge Bardeen Fermilab Education Office 630-840-2031 Homestake DUSEL Workshop,

M. Bardeen, Homestake Feb Lessons We Have Learned. Marge Bardeen Fermilab Education Office Homestake DUSEL Workshop,
The Future of US Accelerator Science – Comments from NSF Tony F. Chan Assistant Director MPS/NSF AAAS Chicago February 13, 2009.

The Future of US Accelerator Science – Comments from NSF Tony F. Chan Assistant Director MPS/NSF AAAS Chicago February 13, 2009.
Oregon Department of Education Oregon Department of Community Colleges & Workforce Development Bureau of Labor and Industries September 2011 CTE Overview.

Oregon Department of Education Oregon Department of Community Colleges & Workforce Development Bureau of Labor and Industries September 2011 CTE Overview.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google