Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Surrogate Reactions for Neutron Capture Nuclear Astrophysics Town Meeting 2012 October 10, 2012 A. Ratkiewicz Rutgers University.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Surrogate Reactions for Neutron Capture Nuclear Astrophysics Town Meeting 2012 October 10, 2012 A. Ratkiewicz Rutgers University."— Presentation transcript:

1 Surrogate Reactions for Neutron Capture Nuclear Astrophysics Town Meeting 2012 October 10, 2012 A. Ratkiewicz Rutgers University

2 Astrotown 2012 Ratkiewicz Nucleosynthesis: the s- and r-processes are primarily responsible for the creation of elements heavier than iron. Applications: –National Security –Nuclear Energy Critical to a robust understanding of nuclear data, but hard to measure! –No pure neutron targets exist: target lifetimes limited to t 1/2 > ~100 days can’t directly measure neutron capture for exotic systems. A surrogate measurement is necessary –NC reaction proceeds through a compound nucleus rather than directly (except in weakly-bound systems) –Neutron capture at energies of interest for astrophysics is dominated by s-waves Importance of Neutron Capture

3 Astrotown 2012 Ratkiewicz Surrogate Technique “Absolute” [1]: “Ratio” [2]: determine ratio of branching ratios Ex. Ch. B.R. Ent. Ch. Figures from J. Escher et al. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 353 (2012). [1] J. Cramer and H. Britt, 1970a, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 41, 177., H. Britt and J. Wilhelmy, 1979, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 72, 222. [2] J.T. Burke et al., 2006, Phys. Rev. C 73, 054604., J. E. Escher and F. S. Dietrich, 2006, Phys. Rev. C 74, 054601. J.E. Escherand F. S. Dietrich, 2010, Phys. Rev. C 81, 024612. Prob. B*

4 Astrotown 2012 Ratkiewicz Recent Results N. Scielzo et al. PRC 81 034608 (2010) 155 Gd(n,  ) vs 156 Gd(p,p’  ) Black: measured and calculated  (n,  ) Blue, yellow data Surrogate-deduced  (n,  ) from 2  0 & 4  2 transitions Curves: Purple = (d) distribution; peak=1.5 Red = (e) distribution; peak=4.5 Green = (f) distribution; peak=7.5

5 Astrotown 2012 Ratkiewicz A decadal retrospective… Table from J. Escher et al. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 353 (2012).

6 Astrotown 2012 Ratkiewicz 95 Mo(n,  ) 96 Mo  95 Mo(d,p  ) 96 Mo Validating Surrogate for (n,  ) Musgrove, et al., NPA 270, 109 (1976) 96 Mo, J  = 0 + 778 keV 1628 keV 1626 keV 2+2+ 4+4+ 2+2+ 1870 keV 4+4+ 2441 keV6+6+ Measure Yrast I(  ) vs E n (n,  ) (d,p  ) normal (d,p  ) inverse Slide Courtesy of J. A. Cizewski

7 Astrotown 2012 Ratkiewicz With 95 Mo target Measure yrast I(  ) vs E n in (n,  ) At LANSCE on FP12 with HPGe detectors 96 Mo 2 + to 0 + Neutron energy (keV) Musgrove, et al., NPA 270, 109 (1976) A. Adekola (Rutgers) Slide Courtesy of J. A. Cizewski Program to Validate (d,p  ): (n,  ) at LANSCE

8 Astrotown 2012 Ratkiewicz 96 Mo 2 + to 0 + 0.960 mg/cm 2 thick 95 Mo target Beam energy of 13 MeV 140  m +1000  m segmented telescopes at forward, backward angles. Four HPGe Compton-suppressed clovers. One hour of data shown. Program to Validate (d,p  ): NK (d,p  ) at TAMU

9 Astrotown 2012 Ratkiewicz Inverse Kinematics measurement of 95 Mo(d,p  ) at ANL with ORRUBA-Gammasphere Develop (d,p  ) in inverse kinematics with RIBS: Confirm that (d,p  ) yields same results in normal and inverse kinematics. Measure multiplicity of photons, for which Gammasphere is ideally suited. Details at ICFN5 (me) and at DNP (Shand). Program to Validate (d,p  ): IK (d,p  ) at ANL

10 Astrotown 2012 Ratkiewicz Facilities: –Beam rates on order of a nA –Pure beams –Energies near Coulomb barrier Detector Systems: –For particles: high energy, position (angular) resolution, large solid angle coverage (maximize detection efficiency without compromising angular resolution). Focus on good PID! –For gammas: high  -ray detection efficiency, high  -ray energy resolution (becomes crucial as we begin to study more exotic systems) (my view of) Experimental Requirements

11 Collaboration A.S. Adekola, S. Burcher, J.A. Cizewski, P. Copp, S. Hardy, M.E. Howard, B. Manning, A. Ratkiewicz, S. Rice, C. Shand, S. Strauss, Rutgers University A.J. Couture, M. Devlin, N. Fotiades, R.O. Nelson, J.M. O’Donnell, LANL J.T. Burke, R.J. Casperson, J.E. Escher, R. Hatarik, N. Scielzo, LLNL M. Carpenter, C.J. Lister, D. Seweryniak, S. Zhu, ANL D. Bardayan, S.D. Pain, ORNL K.L. Jones, UTK W.A. Peters, ORAU R. Kozub, TTU R. Austin, St.Mary’s M. McClesky, TAMU With Special Thanks to: Amy Anderson and Charles Reed (ORAU) Thank you for your attention!

12 With Special Thanks to: Mike Carpenter (ANL) Shaofei Zhu (ANL) Amy Anderson (ORAU) Ken Carter (ORAU) Charles Reed (ORAU) Thank you for your attention!

13 Astrotown 2012 Ratkiewicz TIARA Performance Only core signals from EXOGAM clovers, limiting Doppler correction to 65 keV broadening p  2x10 5 pps 24 Ne 1 mg/cm 2 CD 2 target 2 mm beam spot Slide courtesy of Steven Pain

14 Astrotown 2012 Ratkiewicz GS Efficiency Full, 0 cm/ns 45% Geo 45% Boosted 10.6% Total Boosted Full, 4.13 cm/ns 45% Geo 45% Boosted 10.6% Total Boosted -1 ring, 4.13 cm/ns 43% Geo 42% Boosted 10.0% Total Boosted -1 ring, 0 cm/ns 43% Geo 43% Boosted 10.2% Total Boosted -2 rings, 0 cm/ns 41% Geo 41% Boosted 9.7% Total Boosted -2 rings, 4.13 cm/ns 41% Geo 40% Boosted 9.4% Total Boosted Slide courtesy of Steven Pain

15 Astrotown 2012 Ratkiewicz

16 Microball in Gammasphere http://www.chemistry.wustl.edu/~dgs/mball/pics/mball-a.jpg


Download ppt "Surrogate Reactions for Neutron Capture Nuclear Astrophysics Town Meeting 2012 October 10, 2012 A. Ratkiewicz Rutgers University."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google