1. Date of download: 7/1/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Hydrogen Production by Solar Reforming of Natural Gas: A Comparison Study of Two Possible Process Configurations J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2005;128(1):16-23. doi:10.1115/1.2164447 Solar tower test facility at the Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel Figure Legend:

2. Date of download: 7/1/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Hydrogen Production by Solar Reforming of Natural Gas: A Comparison Study of Two Possible Process Configurations J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2005;128(1):16-23. doi:10.1115/1.2164447 Cut through of a reformer module with flow scheme Figure Legend:

3. Date of download: 7/1/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Hydrogen Production by Solar Reforming of Natural Gas: A Comparison Study of Two Possible Process Configurations J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2005;128(1):16-23. doi:10.1115/1.2164447 Temperature gradients of heat absorption for tubular and volumetric receivers Figure Legend:

4. Date of download: 7/1/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Hydrogen Production by Solar Reforming of Natural Gas: A Comparison Study of Two Possible Process Configurations J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2005;128(1):16-23. doi:10.1115/1.2164447 Cluster of three reformer modules showing a honeycomb Figure Legend:

5. Date of download: 7/1/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Hydrogen Production by Solar Reforming of Natural Gas: A Comparison Study of Two Possible Process Configurations J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2005;128(1):16-23. doi:10.1115/1.2164447 Flow chart of process SMR 3.0 Figure Legend:

6. Date of download: 7/1/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Hydrogen Production by Solar Reforming of Natural Gas: A Comparison Study of Two Possible Process Configurations J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2005;128(1):16-23. doi:10.1115/1.2164447 Flow chart for SMR 1.5 Figure Legend:

7. Date of download: 7/1/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Hydrogen Production by Solar Reforming of Natural Gas: A Comparison Study of Two Possible Process Configurations J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2005;128(1):16-23. doi:10.1115/1.2164447 Comparison of HPC of the conventional process and of the solar reforming process depending on the NG price; source for the NG price is, conversion is 1€=1.2 US$. Figure Legend: