1. CT Birth to Three System – ECO 08/071

2. 2 Connecticut’s FY06 Family Survey Sending them out, getting them back, and analyzing the data… Process

3. CT Birth to Three System – ECO 08/073 Who got what? Part C staff created NCSEAM surveys in English and Spanish using Cardiff’s Telform software since the lead agency has a reader. Unique IDs from Part C Data System were merged onto the forms. Only families who had been in Birth to Three at least 6 months (about ½ of all enrolled.) Eligible families >>> hand delivered (1561) Recently Exited >>> mailed (1151) Process

4. CT Birth to Three System – ECO 08/074 What did they get? Intro letter to family Survey (English or both English + Spanish) PTI offered support with completing the survey and a flyer was included Self-addressed stamped envelope for families to send surveys back to “Birth to Three” Letter included directions to complete the survey online. Process

5. CT Birth to Three System – ECO 08/075 Online Version 2006 - Contracted with a online survey company to set up a web-based version in English and Spanish (challenging) 2007 – Used Survey Monkey to set it up ourselves! Process

6. CT Birth to Three System – ECO 08/076 Connecticut’s “sampling plan” Census  Surveys sent to ALL 2,712 families with at least six months of service as of March 10, 2006.  Then a statistically significant, random, representative, sample was pulled from the completed surveys. Zzzzzzz… Process

7. CT Birth to Three System – ECO 08/077 Statewide Representativeness 712 surveys were completed (26%)  Hand Delivered 29%*, Mailed 19% From the surveys with impact data, a sample of 384 records was randomly selected to be representative based on the race/ethnicities reported in most recent 618 tables. Process

8. CT Birth to Three System – ECO 08/078 FY06 Survey Distribution Census Surveys Completed Random Representative Sample for APR 618 Table 1 12/1/05 Race / EthnicityTotal % of totalTotal % of totalTotal % of totalTotal % of total American Indian or Alaskan Native60.2%20.3%1 130.3% Asian or Pacific Islander793%213% 13 3%1203% Black (Not Hispanic)28310%416% 41 11%44611% Hispanic50919%8612% 74 19%76919% Unknown572%91% 0 0%0 White (Not Hispanic)177265%55378% 255 66%262266% Totals2706100.0%712100%384100%3970100% Statewide Representativeness Process

9. CT Birth to Three System – ECO 08/079 Local Representativeness We analyzed race/ethnicity within each local EI program and compared it to the percent distributed  Due primarily to small numbers, we determined that for MOST of the EI programs, we could not be statistically secure in determining whether the responses were representative at the local level. Process

10. CT Birth to Three System – ECO 08/0710 Results Indicators, Measures and Demographics Results

11. CT Birth to Three System – ECO 08/0711 SPP/APR GroupIndicator 4-AIndicator 4-BIndicator 4-C All Individuals: N = 699* White = 78%74.1%71.2%84.3% Black = 6%95% CI*:95% CI:95% CI: Hispanic = 12%70.7% - 77.2%67.7% - 74.4%81.4% - 86.8% Other = 4% Hand Delivered: N = 441 White = 76%74.8%71.8%86.1% Black = 6%95% CI:95% CI:95% CI: Hispanic = 15%70.5% - 78.6%67.4% - 75.8%82.6% - 89.0% Other = 4% Mail Delivered: N = 218 White = 83%70.6%67.3%79.4% Black = 6%95% CI:95% CI:95% CI: Hispanic = 6%64.2% - 76.2%60.8% - 73.2%73.5% - 84.2% Other = 4% *CL: Confidence Level, followed by the range PlanDemogResultsProcessResults

12. CT Birth to Three System – ECO 08/0712 SPP/APR (cont.) N = 384 White = 65%73.2%71.1%84.4% Black = 11%95% CI:95% CI:95% CI: Hispanic = 20%68.6%-77.4%66.4%-75.4%80.4%-87.7% Other = 4% *CL: Confidence Level, followed by the range 618 Sample Indicator 4-AIndicator 4-BIndicator 4-C RightsAdvocateHelp PlanDemogResultsProcessResults

13. CT Birth to Three System – ECO 08/0713 618 Sample By Race/Ethnicity Indicator 4aIndicator 4bIndicator 4c White/Caucasian72.1%70.5%84.2% (N = 247) 95% CI:95% CI:95% CI: 66.2% - 77.3%64.5% - 75.8%79.1% - 88.2% Black or African 65.9%63.4%80.5% American95% CI:95% CI:95% CI: (N = 41)50.6% - 78.5%48.1% - 76.4%66.0% - 89.8% Hispanic or 82.4%78.4%90.5% Latino95% CI:95% CI:95% CI: (N = 74)72.2% - 89.4%67.7% - 86.2%81.7% - 95.3% Asian or Pacific 66.7%66.7%66.7% Islander95% CI:95% CI:95% CI: (N = 12)39.1% - 86.2%39.1% - 86.2%39.1% - 86.2% Unknown66.7%66.7%66.7% (N = 3)95% CI:95% CI:95% CI: 20.7% - 93.9%20.7% - 93.9%20.7% - 93.9% Zzzzzzz… PlanDemogResultsProcessResults

14. CT Birth to Three System – ECO 08/0714 APR Actual Baseline Data for FFY05 (July 1, 2005-June 30, 2006): 4a) 73.2% 4b) 71.1% 4c) 84.4% This is the percent that (we can be highly confident) met the standard. PlanDemogResultsProcessResults

15. CT Birth to Three System – ECO 08/0715 Connecticut’s Targets (statistically significant…) FFYMeasurable and Rigorous Target 2005 (2005-2006) NA - Baseline reported in FFY05 (2005-2006) 2006 (2006-2007) 4a) 77% 4b) 75% 4c) 88% 2007 (2007-2008) 4a) 77% 4b) 75% 4c) 88% 2008 (2008-2009) 4a) 77% 4b) 75% 4c) 88% 2009 (2009-2010) 4a) 77% 4b) 75% 4c) 88% 2010 (2010-2011) 4a) 77% 4b) 75% 4c) 88% PlanDemogResultsProcessResults

16. CT Birth to Three System – ECO 08/0716 Other Demographics Gender Months in EI Income Groups Hours on IFSP Towns (District Reference Groups) Insurance Type ??????? Demographics

17. CT Birth to Three System – ECO 08/0717 Gender Of the 2706 sent out..  1736 or 64% were Boys  970 or 36% were Girls Of the 712 completed…  466 or 65% were Boys  246 or 35% were Girls DUH… Demographics

18. CT Birth to Three System – ECO 08/0718 Months in EI MonthsALL712 6-1258%56% 13-2433%34% 25-369%10% Demographics

19. CT Birth to Three System – ECO 08/0719 Income Groups Demographics

20. CT Birth to Three System – ECO 08/0720 Hours on IFSP Hours Per MonthALL712 0-459%56% 4.25-828%29% 8.25-137%8% >136%8% Demographics

21. CT Birth to Three System – ECO 08/0721 Town of Residence District Reference Groups = combines like cities & towns DRG2706712 A3%4% Small, High SES B14%18% C4%4% D13%16% E3%5% F5%6% G15%14% H16%14% I22%13%Urban Priority Schools (DK3% 4%) Demographics

22. CT Birth to Three System – ECO 08/0722 Insurance Type Of the 2706 sent out..  1666 or 62% were covered by Commercial Insurance  1040 or 38% were covered by Medicaid Of the 712 completed…  534 or 75% were covered by Commercial Insurance  178 or 25% were covered by Medicaid Demographics

23. CT Birth to Three System – ECO 08/0723 Race/Ethnicity by Ins. Type Survey Distribution CensusInsurance Type Race / EthCommercial% R/EMedicaid% R/ETotal% of total American Indian or Alaskan Native6100% 0%60.2% Asian or Pacific Islander6886%1114%793% Black (Not Hispanic)8028%20372%28310% Hispanic11322%39678%50919% Unknown2951%2849%572% White (Not Hispanic)137077%40223%177265% Totals166662%104038%2706100% Surveys CompletedInsurance Type Race / EthCommercial% R/EMedicaid% R/ETotal% of total American Indian or Alaskan Native2100%00%20.3% Asian or Pacific Islander2095%15%213% Black (Not Hispanic)1024%3176%416% Hispanic2833%5867%8612% Unknown444%556%91% White (Not Hispanic)47085%8315%55378% Totals53475%17825%712100% Demographics

24. CT Birth to Three System – ECO 08/0724 Next How do these relate to the survey measures and APR indicators? Time and Resources….

25. CT Birth to Three System – ECO 08/0725 (That’s another show) Linda.Goodman@po.state.ct.us Alice.Ridgway@po.state.ct.us Next